Comparison Overview

Coupang

VS

Wolt

Coupang

720 Olive Way, None, Seattle, Washington, US, 98101
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 0 and 549

We exist to wow our customers. We know we’re doing the right thing when we hear our customers say, “How did I ever live without Coupang?” Born out of an obsession to make shopping, eating, and living easier than ever, we are collectively disrupting the multi-billion-dollar commerce industry from the ground up and establishing an unparalleled reputation for being one of many high-performing companies and reliable force in South Korean commerce. We are proud to have the best of both worlds — a startup culture with the resources of a large global public company. This fuels us to continue our growth and launch new services at the speed we have been since our inception. We are all entrepreneurial, surrounded by opportunities to drive new initiatives and innovations. At our core, we are bold and ambitious people that like to get our hands dirty and make a hands-on impact. At Coupang, you will see yourself, your colleagues, your team, and the company grow every day. Our mission to build the future of commerce is real. We push the boundaries of what’s possible to solve problems and break traditional tradeoffs. Join Coupang now to create an epic experience in this always-on, high-tech, and hyper-connected world.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 7,994
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
1

Wolt

Pohjoinen Rautatiekatu 21, Helsinki, Uusimaa, FI, 00100
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Wolt is a Helsinki-based technology company with a mission to bring joy, simplicity and earnings to the neighborhoods of the world. Wolt develops a local commerce platform that connects people looking to order food, groceries, and other goods with people interested in selling and delivering them. Wolt was founded in 2014 and joined forces with DoorDash (NASDAQ: DASH) in 2022. Together, we operate in more than 30 countries today.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 11,073
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coupang.jpeg
Coupang
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wolt-oy.jpeg
Wolt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coupang
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wolt
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Coupang has 589.66% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wolt in 2025.

Incident History — Coupang (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coupang cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wolt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wolt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coupang.jpeg
Coupang
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat (Former Employee), Unauthorized Data Extraction
Motivation: Potentially Financial Gain (Data Theft), Unclear (Under Investigation)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: exploitation of signed access token
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wolt-oy.jpeg
Wolt
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wolt company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Coupang company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Coupang company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Wolt company has not reported any.

In the current year, Coupang company has reported more cyber incidents than Wolt company.

Neither Wolt company nor Coupang company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Coupang company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Wolt company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Wolt company nor Coupang company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Coupang company nor Wolt company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coupang nor Wolt holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Coupang company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Wolt company.

Wolt company employs more people globally than Coupang company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Coupang nor Wolt holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coupang nor Wolt holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coupang nor Wolt holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coupang nor Wolt holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coupang nor Wolt holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coupang nor Wolt holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N