Comparison Overview

GE Vernova

VS

Windlift

GE Vernova

58 Charles St, None, Boston, Massachusetts, US, 02141
Last Update: 2025-12-09

GE Vernova is a purpose-built energy technology company on a mission to electrify and decarbonize the world. It is made up of three businesses -- Power, Wind, and Electrification -- with focus on accelerating the path to more reliable, affordable, and sustainable energy, while helping our customers power economies and deliver the electricity that is vital to health, safety, security, and improved quality of life. The world needs more energy, smarter energy. With energy demand expected to grow by more than 50% in the next 20 years, we are continuously innovating to meet the moment…like we have for the past 130 years. The Energy of Change and relentless optimism are what drive us – it’s about never giving up and seeing what’s possible so that we deliver the energy technologies the world needs right now and for generations to come. GE Vernova’s attitude and edge is embedded in its name. We retain our treasured legacy, “GE,” as an enduring and hard-earned badge of quality and ingenuity. “Ver” / “verde” signal Earth’s verdant and lush ecosystems. “Nova,” from the Latin “novus,” nods to a new, innovative era of lower carbon energy that GE Vernova will help deliver. Together, we have the energy to change the world.

NAICS: 22111
NAICS Definition: Electric Power Generation
Employees: 57,523
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Windlift

2445 S Alston Ave, Durham, North Carolina, 27713, US
Last Update: 2025-12-05
Between 750 and 799

We are a wind energy engineering and computer software company developing Airborne Power Generators (APGs). The Windlift APG is an Airborne Wind Energy (AWE) system that uses a tethered wing with onboard rotors to generate electricity from the wind. Windlift APGs operate by harnessing the same wind power as a traditional turbine, but with only 10% of the materials, potentially making them the highest energy density (wh/kg) for any renewable energy system in windy environments.

NAICS: 22111
NAICS Definition: Electric Power Generation
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gevernova.jpeg
GE Vernova
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/windlift.jpeg
Windlift
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GE Vernova
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Windlift
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Electric Power Generation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GE Vernova in 2025.

Incidents vs Electric Power Generation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Windlift in 2025.

Incident History — GE Vernova (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GE Vernova cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Windlift (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Windlift cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gevernova.jpeg
GE Vernova
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/windlift.jpeg
Windlift
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GE Vernova company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Windlift company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Windlift company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GE Vernova company.

In the current year, Windlift company and GE Vernova company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Windlift company nor GE Vernova company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Windlift company nor GE Vernova company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Windlift company nor GE Vernova company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GE Vernova company nor Windlift company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GE Vernova company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Windlift company.

GE Vernova company employs more people globally than Windlift company, reflecting its scale as a Electric Power Generation.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GE Vernova nor Windlift holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N