Qualcomm
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
Delivering intelligent computing everywhere.
NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 45,945
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Comparison Overview
Qualcomm
VS
vivo
vivo
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
vivo is a technology company that creates great products based on a design-driven value, with smart devices and intelligent services as its core. The company aims to build a bridge between humans and the digital world. Through unique creativity, vivo provides users with an increasingly convenient mobile and digital life. vivo has over 18,000 employees across the globe. While bringing together and developing the best local talents to deliver excellence, vivo is supported by a network of 10 R&D centers in Shenzhen, Dongguan, Nanjing, Beijing, Hangzhou, Shanghai, Xi'an, Taipei, Tokyo and San Diego, focusing on the development of state-of-the-art consumer technologies, including 5G, artificial intelligence, industrial design, imaging system and other up-and-coming technologies. vivo has also set up 7 production bases (including brand-authorized manufacturing centers), across China, South- and Southeast Asia, and more regions, with an annual production capacity of nearly 200 million smartphones. As of now, vivo has branched out its sales network across more than 60 countries and regions, and is winning more than 400 million users worldwide with its superior products and services. Following the company's core values, which include Benfen, design-driven value, user-orientation, continuous learning and team spirit. vivo has implemented a sustainable development strategy, with the vision of developing into a healthier, more sustainable world-class corporation. Official Site: www.vivo.com/en Facebook: @vivoGlobal Instagram: @vivo_global
NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 18,472
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
Qualcomm
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
vivo
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Qualcomm
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
vivo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Qualcomm in 2025.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for vivo in 2025.
Incident History — Qualcomm (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Qualcomm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — vivo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
vivo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
Qualcomm
Incidents
Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: GPU Driver Exploitation
Motivation: Full Device Control
Blog: Blog
vivo
Incidents
No Incident
FAQ
Qualcomm company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to vivo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
Qualcomm company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas vivo company has not reported any.
In the current year, vivo company and Qualcomm company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Neither vivo company nor Qualcomm company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Neither vivo company nor Qualcomm company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.
Neither vivo company nor Qualcomm company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.
Qualcomm company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while vivo company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Neither Qualcomm nor vivo holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
vivo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Qualcomm company.
Qualcomm company employs more people globally than vivo company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.
Neither Qualcomm nor vivo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither Qualcomm nor vivo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither Qualcomm nor vivo holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither Qualcomm nor vivo holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither Qualcomm nor vivo holds HIPAA certification.
Neither Qualcomm nor vivo holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description
Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description
Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
