Comparison Overview

Foxconn Industrial Internet USA

VS

Unified Industries, Inc.

Foxconn Industrial Internet USA

11240 County Line Rd, None, Mt Pleasant, WI, US, 53177
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849

Foxconn Industrial Internet USA (Fii USA) is a global leading professional design and manufacturing service provider of communication network equipment, cloud service equipment, precision tools, and industrial robots. Our goal is to provide our customers with intelligent manufacturing services for new forms of electronic equipment products centered on the industrial internet platform. Our Vision: Fii USA is creating technology solutions in 5G, IoT, and Industrial AI to aid businesses in transforming to the Industry 4.0 environment. Our Philosophy: Fii USA will leverage its’ 30 years’ experience in contract manufacturing to develop technology solutions that will guide businesses on their Industry 4.0 journey. We are building industrial IoT ecosystems grounded solutions that utilize 5G communication technology, 8K imaging data, Industrial AI, and high-performance computing. Our solutions are easily implemented, modified, and scaled to enable participation in the modern connected landscape.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 377
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Unified Industries, Inc.

740 Advance St, Brighton, Michigan, 48116, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1953 Unified Industries began as a small fixture and gauging shop in Howell, MI. Over the years we have grown into a Full Service Material Handling Systems Provider. As a wholly owned subsidiary of the Columbus McKinnon Corporation we can offer complete floor-to-ceiling material handling systems. Our capabilities and products include: Enclosed Track Aluminum Workstations and Jib Cranes. Articulating Arms, Torque Reaction Tubes Custom Ergonomic Lift Assists Uni-Life Fall Protection Systems Pneumatic Balancers Industrial Hoists Free-Stand Support Structures

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fii-usa.jpeg
Foxconn Industrial Internet USA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unified-industries-inc..jpeg
Unified Industries, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Foxconn Industrial Internet USA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Unified Industries, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foxconn Industrial Internet USA in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unified Industries, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Foxconn Industrial Internet USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foxconn Industrial Internet USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Unified Industries, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unified Industries, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fii-usa.jpeg
Foxconn Industrial Internet USA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unified-industries-inc..jpeg
Unified Industries, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Unified Industries, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Unified Industries, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company.

In the current year, Unified Industries, Inc. company and Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Unified Industries, Inc. company nor Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Unified Industries, Inc. company nor Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Unified Industries, Inc. company nor Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company nor Unified Industries, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Unified Industries, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Unified Industries, Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company.

Foxconn Industrial Internet USA company employs more people globally than Unified Industries, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Unified Industries, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Unified Industries, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Unified Industries, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Unified Industries, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Unified Industries, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Foxconn Industrial Internet USA nor Unified Industries, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N