Comparison Overview

Boeing Shanghai Aviation

VS

Textron

Boeing Shanghai Aviation

Shanghai, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Boeing Shanghai was established in June 2006 as a joint venture of Boeing, Shanghai Airport Authorities and China Eastern Airlines, providing a broad range of services from engineering, aircraft maintenance and modification to component repair and overhaul and supply chain management. Its base maintenance and modification capabilities cover major and minor checks, structure modifications, interior refurbishment and passenger-to-freighter conversion. The aircraft types that Boeing Shanghai can serve include Boeing 787, 777, 767 and 737NG.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 335
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Textron

40 Westminster, Providence, 02903, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Textron Inc. is a multi-industry company that leverages its global network of aircraft, defense, industrial and finance businesses to provide customers with innovative solutions and services. Textron is known around the world for its powerful brands such as Bell, Cessna, Beechcraft, Pipistrel, Jacobsen, Kautex, Lycoming, E-Z-GO, and Textron Systems. For more information, visit: www.textron.com.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 26,773
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boeing-shanghai-aviation.jpeg
Boeing Shanghai Aviation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/textron.jpeg
Textron
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boeing Shanghai Aviation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Textron
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boeing Shanghai Aviation in 2025.

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Textron in 2025.

Incident History — Boeing Shanghai Aviation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boeing Shanghai Aviation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Textron (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Textron cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boeing-shanghai-aviation.jpeg
Boeing Shanghai Aviation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/textron.jpeg
Textron
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Textron company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Boeing Shanghai Aviation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Textron company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Boeing Shanghai Aviation company.

In the current year, Textron company and Boeing Shanghai Aviation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Textron company nor Boeing Shanghai Aviation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Textron company nor Boeing Shanghai Aviation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Textron company nor Boeing Shanghai Aviation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boeing Shanghai Aviation company nor Textron company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boeing Shanghai Aviation nor Textron holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Textron company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Boeing Shanghai Aviation company.

Textron company employs more people globally than Boeing Shanghai Aviation company, reflecting its scale as a Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing.

Neither Boeing Shanghai Aviation nor Textron holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boeing Shanghai Aviation nor Textron holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boeing Shanghai Aviation nor Textron holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boeing Shanghai Aviation nor Textron holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boeing Shanghai Aviation nor Textron holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boeing Shanghai Aviation nor Textron holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N