Target
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
target
Website:
Employees number:
165,627
Number of followers:
2,334,140
NAICS:
43
Industry Type:
Homepage:
www.target.com/careers
IP Addresses:
440
Company ID:
TAR_8863761
Scan Status:
Completed
Target Company CyberSecurity Posture
www.target.com/careers
Target is one of the world’s most recognized brands and one of America’s leading retailers. We make Target our guests’ preferred shopping destination by offering outstanding value, inspiration, innovation and an exceptional guest experience that no other retailer can deliver. Target is committed to responsible corporate citizenship, ethical business practices, environmental stewardship and generous community support. Since 1946, we have given 5 percent of our profits back to our communities. Our goal is to work as one team to fulfill our unique brand promise to our guests, wherever and whenever they choose to shop. For more information, visit corporate.target.com. Beware of Hiring Scams: Target will never ask you to submit personal information via a text message for a position. Target will only ask you to apply for positions through corporate.target.com/careers, or Workday, our applicant tracking system.
Target A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Target Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
Target
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Target Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Target
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Target Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
3
Attack Types
2
Target Corporation
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Target Corporation on December 20, 2013. The breach occurred between November 27 and December 15, 2013, resulting from unauthorized access to payment card data. Compromised information included customer names, credit or debit card numbers, expiration dates, and CVVs. The number of individuals affected is unknown.
Target
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In 2013, **Target** suffered one of the most infamous third-party breaches in retail history when cybercriminals infiltrated its systems via a compromised **HVAC vendor (Fazio Mechanical Services)**. The attackers exploited weak credentials from the vendor’s network to access Target’s payment systems, stealing **40 million credit/debit card records** and **70 million customer details** (names, addresses, phone numbers, and email addresses). The breach resulted in **$200+ million in direct costs**, including legal settlements, regulatory fines, and credit monitoring for affected customers. Beyond financial losses, Target faced **severe reputational damage**, a **plummet in consumer trust**, and a **46% drop in profits** during the post-breach quarter. The incident also triggered industry-wide scrutiny of third-party risk management, prompting stricter compliance mandates like **PCI DSS updates** and accelerated adoption of vendor security audits. The breach exposed systemic vulnerabilities in supply chain cybersecurity, proving that even robust internal defenses could be bypassed through negligent third-party partners.
Target
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In December 2013, Target fell victim to one of the largest retail cyber attacks in history. The attack exposed payment card information of 41 million customers and contact details for an additional 29 million. Utilizing a spear phishing technique, attackers initially compromised a third-party vendor's credentials, providing them with access to Target's network. Subsequently, malware was installed to collect customer payment data across a two-month period. This breach not only led to significant financial losses amounting to approximately $290 million but also resulted in the departure of Target's CEO and country-wide fines totaling $18.5 million. Remediation efforts, consulting, and various associated expenses substantially increased the cost of this breach.
Target Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Target
Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Target in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Target in 2025.
Incident Types Target vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Target in 2025.
Incident History — Target (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Target cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Target Company Subsidiaries
Target is one of the world’s most recognized brands and one of America’s leading retailers. We make Target our guests’ preferred shopping destination by offering outstanding value, inspiration, innovation and an exceptional guest experience that no other retailer can deliver. Target is committed to responsible corporate citizenship, ethical business practices, environmental stewardship and generous community support. Since 1946, we have given 5 percent of our profits back to our communities. Our goal is to work as one team to fulfill our unique brand promise to our guests, wherever and whenever they choose to shop. For more information, visit corporate.target.com. Beware of Hiring Scams: Target will never ask you to submit personal information via a text message for a position. Target will only ask you to apply for positions through corporate.target.com/careers, or Workday, our applicant tracking system.
Loading...
Target Similar Companies
Boots UK
Boots is the UK’s leading health and beauty retailer with over 52,000 team members and around 1,800 stores,* ranging from local community pharmacies to large destination health and beauty stores. We serve our customers and patients’ wellbeing for life as the leading provider of healthcare on the hi
JYSK
JYSK is an international home furnishing retailer with Scandinavian roots that makes it easy to furnish every room in any home and garden. JYSK delivers a great Scandinavian offer for everyone within sleeping and living. We are a global retail chain of stores and web shops, and part of the family-
Sainsbury's
Over 150 years old and still going strong, we’re the UK’s second-biggest retailer. Every day, the nation shops with us because they know they’ll get affordable, good food and excellent service. We focus on great value and convenient shopping across our family of brands, from Argos, Nectar and Habit
The Guitar Center Company
We exist so music can persist. Our family of brands has put more instruments into the hands of more people than anyone on the planet. Meet the family or, as we call them, The Guitar Center Company. Guitar Center. But there's more to us than guitars and basses. We carry all kinds of musical instrume
Auchan Retail
To create new-generation retailing that improves people’s lives, Auchan Retail places customers at the centre of its actions and reaffirms the retailer’s role: that of a multi-format, “phygital” activist for good, healthy, local produce that constantly reinvents itself to deliver a new customer expe
Comercial Mexicana
Nuestra misión es ser la tienda de autoservicio preferida por el consumidor, que entregue altos rendimientos a sus inversionistas; ser un cliente honesto y respetuoso para sus proveedores y representar una de las mejores ofertas laborales del país. Nuestra visión es ser la cadena de tiendas de au
Sobeys
As one of only two national grocery retailers in Canada, Sobeys Inc. serves the food shopping needs of Canadians with more than 1,500 stores in 10 provinces with retail banners that include Sobeys, Safeway, IGA, Foodland, FreshCo, Price Chopper, Thrifty Foods and Lawtons Drugs, as well as more than
Fozzy Group
Fozzy Group is one of the largest trade industrial groups in Ukraine and one of the leading Ukrainian retailers, with over 700 outlets all around the country. Besides retail, the group's businesses include food production, and restaurants. Fozzy Group is introducing modern solutions in all areas
LC Waikiki
We have been continuing our journey that we started in France in 1988, as a Turkish brand since 1997 under the structure of “LC Waikiki Mağazacılık Hizmetleri Ticaret A.Ş.”. We act with the philosophy of “Everyone deserves to dress well” and we are working to be one of the pioneers of the industry w
.png)
Target CyberSecurity News
November 25, 2025 11:04 PM
Free Wi-Fi on flights: How to safely avoid cybersecurity hackers while using airline Wi-Fi during holiday travel for Thanksgiving
Free internet at 35000 feet may sound great, but cybersecurity experts say it can also make you a target. Here's how to safely use the...
November 25, 2025 04:54 PM
CISA urges mobile security as it warns of sophisticated spyware attacks
The agency's rare warning about spyware activity comes as it updated mobile security guidance to reflect evolving threats.
November 25, 2025 03:21 PM
Russian hackers target U.S. engineering firm because of work done for Ukrainian sister city
Washington — Hackers working for Russian intelligence attacked an American engineering company this fall, investigators at a U.S....
November 25, 2025 01:27 PM
CISA Warns of Threat Actors Leveraging Commercial Spyware to Target Users of Signal and WhatsApp
Cybersecurity authorities have raised fresh alarms over the spread of advanced commercial spyware targeting secure messaging apps like...
November 25, 2025 09:15 AM
Spyware Allows Cyber Threat Actors to Target Users of Messaging Apps, CISA Says
CISA has announced that it is aware of multiple cyber threat actors actively leveraging commercial spyware to target users of mobile...
November 24, 2025 12:53 PM
ToddyCat APT Accessing Organizations Internal Communications of Employees at Target Companies
ToddyCat APT now bypasses cloud email security, secretly accessing corporate communications across Exchange, Microsoft 365, and Gmail.
November 21, 2025 06:08 PM
Cybersecurity Snapshot: Global Agencies Target Criminal “Bulletproof” Hosts, as CSA Unveils Agentic AI Risk Framework
Cyber agencies call on ISPs to help combat "bulletproof" internet hosts that shield cybercriminals. Meanwhile, the CSA introduced a new...
November 19, 2025 05:50 PM
Three Nations Target Russian 'Bulletproof' Ransomware Host
US, UK, Australia sanction Media Land hosting company used by LockBit, BlackSuit gangs.
November 19, 2025 03:05 PM
Everyone’s a target: The importance of cybersecurity in a fast changing world
As the Scottish Government updates its cybersecurity framework, the message is clear that everyone is at risk of an attack.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Target CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Target
The official website of Target is www.target.com/careers.
Target’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Target’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 793, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Target’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Target currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Target have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Target is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Target have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Target does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Target comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Target is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Target have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Target does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Target comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Target is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Target have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Target is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Target
Target operates primarily in the Retail industry.
Number of Employees at Target
Target employs approximately 165,627 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Target
Target presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Target’s LinkedIn Followers
Target’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 2,334,140 followers.
NAICS Classification of Target
Target is classified under the NAICS code 43, which corresponds to Retail Trade.
Target’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, Target has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/target.
Target’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Target maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/target.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Target
As of December 11, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Target has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Target has an estimated 15,469 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Target ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Ransomware and Breach.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Target ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $490 million.
How does Target detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an remediation measures with contractual safeguards (e.g., dora compliance), remediation measures with continuous monitoring, remediation measures with risk tiering, and enhanced monitoring with recommended for third-party vendors..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Target Data Breach
Description: In December 2013, Target fell victim to one of the largest retail cyber attacks in history. The attack exposed payment card information of 41 million customers and contact details for an additional 29 million. Utilizing a spear phishing technique, attackers initially compromised a third-party vendor's credentials, providing them with access to Target's network. Subsequently, malware was installed to collect customer payment data across a two-month period. This breach not only led to significant financial losses amounting to approximately $290 million but also resulted in the departure of Target's CEO and country-wide fines totaling $18.5 million. Remediation efforts, consulting, and various associated expenses substantially increased the cost of this breach.
Date Detected: 2013-12-01
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Spear Phishing
Vulnerability Exploited: Compromised third-party vendor credentials
Title: Target Corporation Data Breach
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Target Corporation on December 20, 2013. The breach occurred between November 27 and December 15, 2013, resulting from unauthorized access to payment card data, with compromised information including customer names, credit or debit card numbers, expiration dates, and CVVs. The number of individuals affected is unknown.
Date Detected: 2013-12-20
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2013-12-20
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Title: Third-Party Cybersecurity Breaches in Europe’s Top Firms (2023)
Description: A staggering 98% of Europe’s top 100 firms suffered third-party breaches in the last year, highlighting the critical yet underestimated risk posed by suppliers, platforms, and partners. These breaches often stem from inadequate vetting, poor visibility into vendor security practices, and lack of continuous monitoring. Attackers exploit third-party vulnerabilities to bypass hardened defenses, leading to operational disruption, reputational damage, and regulatory penalties. Notable examples include the Target breach (via a compromised HVAC vendor) and recent retail breaches originating from third-party providers. The financial sector faces heightened risks under regulations like DORA, which mandate robust third-party risk management frameworks.
Type: Third-Party Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Vendor SystemsInadequate VettingLack of Continuous MonitoringExploitation of Weak Supply Chain Links
Vulnerability Exploited: Poor Vendor Security PracticesInsufficient Contractual SafeguardsLack of Real-Time Threat Detection
Motivation: Financial GainData TheftOperational Disruption
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Third-party vendor credentials, Compromised Third-Party Vendor (e.g. and HVAC vendor in Target breach).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050824
Financial Loss: $290 million
Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact details
Legal Liabilities: $18.5 million in fines
Payment Information Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach TAR443072925
Data Compromised: Customer names, Credit or debit card numbers, Expiration dates, Cvvs
Payment Information Risk: True
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Financial Loss: Over $200 million (e.g., Target breach)
Data Compromised: Customer data, Sensitive business information
Operational Impact: Significant disruption (e.g., business continuity risks)
Customer Complaints: Loss of consumer trust (e.g., Target breach)
Brand Reputation Impact: Irreversible reputational damage
Legal Liabilities: Regulatory PenaltiesNon-Compliance with DORA (for financial sector)
Identity Theft Risk: High (due to compromised PII in breaches like Target)
Payment Information Risk: High (e.g., Target breach involved payment card data)
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $163.33 million.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Payment Card Information, Contact Details, , Customer Names, Credit Or Debit Card Numbers, Expiration Dates, Cvvs, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Payment Card Data, Sensitive Business Data and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050824
Entity Name: Target
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 70 million
Incident : Data Breach TAR443072925
Entity Name: Target Corporation
Entity Type: Retail
Industry: Retail
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Entity Name: Europe’s Top 100 Firms (98% affected)
Entity Type: Corporations, Financial Institutions, Retailers
Industry: Multiple (e.g., Retail, Finance, Technology)
Location: Europe
Size: Large Enterprises
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Entity Name: Target Corporation
Entity Type: Retailer
Industry: Retail
Location: United States
Size: Large Enterprise
Customers Affected: Millions (payment card data compromised)
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Remediation Measures: Contractual Safeguards (e.g., DORA compliance)Continuous MonitoringRisk Tiering
Enhanced Monitoring: Recommended for third-party vendors
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050824
Type of Data Compromised: Payment card information, Contact details
Number of Records Exposed: 70 million
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
Incident : Data Breach TAR443072925
Type of Data Compromised: Customer names, Credit or debit card numbers, Expiration dates, Cvvs
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Payment card data, Sensitive business data
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Likely (e.g., Target breach involved exfiltration)
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (e.g., customer names, payment details)
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Contractual Safeguards (e.g., DORA compliance), Continuous Monitoring, Risk Tiering, .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050824
Fines Imposed: $18.5 million
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Regulations Violated: Potential GDPR (for European firms), DORA (for financial institutions),
Regulatory Notifications: Mandated under DORA for financial sector breaches
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Lessons Learned: Third-party risk must be treated as a strategic priority, not a checkbox., Comprehensive due diligence and continuous monitoring are critical., Contractual safeguards (e.g., DORA) must define roles, access rights, and breach notification timelines., Risk tiering helps prioritize high-risk vendors., Incident response plans must integrate third-party coordination.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Recommendations: Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability., Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Third-party risk must be treated as a strategic priority, not a checkbox.,Comprehensive due diligence and continuous monitoring are critical.,Contractual safeguards (e.g., DORA) must define roles, access rights, and breach notification timelines.,Risk tiering helps prioritize high-risk vendors.,Incident response plans must integrate third-party coordination.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability. and Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR443072925
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2013-12-20
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Source: Target Data Breach Case Study
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Source: Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) Guidelines
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: California Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2013-12-20, and Source: Target Data Breach Case Study, and Source: Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) Guidelines.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Customer Advisories: Transparency in breach notifications to rebuild trust (e.g., post-Target breach)
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Transparency In Breach Notifications To Rebuild Trust (E.G., Post-Target Breach) and .
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach TAR304050824
Entry Point: Third-party vendor credentials
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Entry Point: Compromised Third-Party Vendor (E.G., Hvac Vendor In Target Breach),
High Value Targets: Customer Data, Payment Systems, Sensitive Business Operations,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Customer Data, Payment Systems, Sensitive Business Operations,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Third-Party Breach TAR0562405102225
Root Causes: Inadequate Third-Party Vetting And Security Assessments., Lack Of Visibility Into Vendor Security Practices., Over-Reliance On Compliance Checkboxes Rather Than Proactive Risk Management., Failure To Integrate Third Parties Into Incident Response Plans.,
Corrective Actions: Implement Robust Tprm Programs With Continuous Monitoring., Enforce Contractual Safeguards (E.G., Dora Compliance)., Tier Vendors By Risk And Prioritize High-Risk Relationships., Integrate Third Parties Into Incident Response Frameworks., Foster A Culture Of Shared Responsibility And Digital Trust.,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Recommended for third-party vendors.
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Implement Robust Tprm Programs With Continuous Monitoring., Enforce Contractual Safeguards (E.G., Dora Compliance)., Tier Vendors By Risk And Prioritize High-Risk Relationships., Integrate Third Parties Into Incident Response Frameworks., Foster A Culture Of Shared Responsibility And Digital Trust., .
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2013-12-01.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2013-12-20.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was $290 million.
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Payment card information, Contact details, , Customer names, Credit or debit card numbers, Expiration dates, CVVs, , Customer Data, Sensitive Business Information and .
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Sensitive Business Information, CVVs, Contact details, Expiration dates, Customer Data, Payment card information, Customer names and Credit or debit card numbers.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 70.0M.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation ?
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was $18.5 million.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Incident response plans must integrate third-party coordination.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Invest in shared defenses and digital trust verification with partners., Implement continuous monitoring tools for real-time threat detection., Enforce contractual safeguards with clear responsibilities and termination clauses., Adopt a proactive, intelligence-led third-party risk management (TPRM) program., Comply with regulations like DORA (for financial institutions) to mitigate supply chain risks., Align security, legal, procurement, and operations teams for shared accountability. and Prioritize high-risk vendors based on data sensitivity and service criticality..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) Guidelines, Target Data Breach Case Study and California Office of the Attorney General.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Transparency in breach notifications to rebuild trust (e.g. and post-Target breach).
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Third-party vendor credentials.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description
Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description
Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=target' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
