Comparison Overview

Alphabet Inc.

VS

SRG

Alphabet Inc.

1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, None, Mountain View, CA, US, 94043
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849

Alphabet is a collection of companies, including Google, Verily Life Sciences, GV, Calico, and X. In October 2015, Alphabet became the parent holding company of Google, with the companies far afield of our main internet products contained in Alphabet.

NAICS: 55
NAICS Definition: Management of Companies and Enterprises
Employees: 2,593
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

SRG

PO Box 6669, Dammam 31452, Saudi Arabia. Dammam, Eastern 31452, SA
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Saeed Raddad Group (SRG) has had an influential and substantial presence in the commercial and business life of Saudi Arabia since 1982 with manpower of more than 34,000 employees. SRG companies operate in diversified business sectors having significant local & international operations. SRG is an investment holding powerhouse headquartered in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. The Group, which has a diverse portfolio of market leading businesses across the Construction, Manufacturing, Oil & Gas, Travel & Tourism, Manpower, Pharmaceutical and Trading sectors, is the region’s preferred investment partner and employer of choice. SRG main subsidiaries are, SRACO group, UCC group, GTS, Dammam palace, Manifa, Napesco, TST, and Alrazi pharma. Show more Show less

NAICS: 551
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alphabet-inc.jpeg
Alphabet Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sraco.jpeg
SRG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alphabet Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SRG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Holding Companies Industry Average (This Year)

Alphabet Inc. has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Holding Companies Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SRG in 2025.

Incident History — Alphabet Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alphabet Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SRG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SRG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alphabet-inc.jpeg
Alphabet Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party Vendor (Salesforce Database), Data Exposure via Search Engines
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sraco.jpeg
SRG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alphabet Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SRG company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Alphabet Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas SRG company has not reported any.

In the current year, Alphabet Inc. company has reported more cyber incidents than SRG company.

Neither SRG company nor Alphabet Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Alphabet Inc. company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other SRG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither SRG company nor Alphabet Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alphabet Inc. company nor SRG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alphabet Inc. nor SRG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Alphabet Inc. company nor SRG company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SRG company employs more people globally than Alphabet Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Holding Companies.

Neither Alphabet Inc. nor SRG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alphabet Inc. nor SRG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alphabet Inc. nor SRG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alphabet Inc. nor SRG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alphabet Inc. nor SRG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alphabet Inc. nor SRG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N