Comparison Overview

Lockheed Martin

VS

NAVAL GROUP

Lockheed Martin

6801 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, US, 20817
Last Update: 2025-12-11

The world relies on what we do. Headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, with offices across the U.S. and around the globe, our team delivers solutions that strengthen national security, shape industries and push engineering and technology to new levels. We collaborate to win. We put our customers first. And we perform with excellence. The best careers are built at Lockheed Martin. Join us.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 102,502
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

NAVAL GROUP

40-42 rue du docteur FInlay, None, Paris cedex 15, None, FR, 75732
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749

As an international naval defence player, Naval Group is a partner for countries seeking to maintain control of their maritime sovereignty. Naval Group develops innovative solutions to meet its customers’ requirements. The group is present throughout the entire life cycle of vessels. It designs, produces, equips, integrates, supports and upgrades submarines and surface ships, as well as their systems and equipment, right up to the final phases of deconstruction and dismantling. Naval Group’s unique know-how in autonomous systems, underwater weapons and drones place it in pole position to become European leader in the sector. As a high-tech company, it draws on its outstanding expertise, unique design and production resources and ability to establish strategic partnerships, in particular within the framework of transfers of technology. It also provides shipyard and naval base services. Ever mindful of the issues concerning corporate social responsibility (CSR), Naval Group is a signatory to the United Nations Global Compact. Located on five continents, the group generates revenue of 4.355 billion euros and has 16,722 employees (Full-Time Equivalent average annual workforce - figures as on 31 December 2024).

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 11,935
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lockheed-martin.jpeg
Lockheed Martin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Lockheed Martin
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NAVAL GROUP
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lockheed Martin in 2025.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

NAVAL GROUP has 36.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Lockheed Martin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lockheed Martin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NAVAL GROUP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAVAL GROUP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lockheed-martin.jpeg
Lockheed Martin
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: DDoS
Motivation: Hacktivism, Disruption
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/naval-group.jpeg
NAVAL GROUP
Incidents

FAQ

Lockheed Martin company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NAVAL GROUP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NAVAL GROUP company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Lockheed Martin company.

In the current year, NAVAL GROUP company has reported more cyber incidents than Lockheed Martin company.

Neither NAVAL GROUP company nor Lockheed Martin company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

NAVAL GROUP company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Lockheed Martin company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both NAVAL GROUP company and Lockheed Martin company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Neither Lockheed Martin company nor NAVAL GROUP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Lockheed Martin nor NAVAL GROUP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lockheed Martin company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to NAVAL GROUP company.

Lockheed Martin company employs more people globally than NAVAL GROUP company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Neither Lockheed Martin nor NAVAL GROUP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Lockheed Martin nor NAVAL GROUP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Lockheed Martin nor NAVAL GROUP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Lockheed Martin nor NAVAL GROUP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Lockheed Martin nor NAVAL GROUP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Lockheed Martin nor NAVAL GROUP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N