Comparison Overview

Ozon

VS

Mohawk Industries

Ozon

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Ozon

NAICS: 313
NAICS Definition: Textile Mills
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mohawk Industries

160 S Industrial Blvd, Calhoun, 30701, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Are you looking for more? At Mohawk Industries, we’re committed to more – more customer solutions, more process improvements, more sustainable manufacturing and more opportunities for our team. As a Fortune 500 global flooring leader with some of the best-known brands in the industry, Mohawk is a great place to start or develop your career with an emphasis on more of what’s important to you. Whether you want to lead more, innovate more, learn more or create more, you can find your more with Mohawk.

NAICS: 313
NAICS Definition: Textile Mills
Employees: 12,695
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ozon.jpeg
Ozon
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mohawk-industries.jpeg
Mohawk Industries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ozon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mohawk Industries
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Textile Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ozon in 2025.

Incidents vs Textile Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mohawk Industries in 2025.

Incident History — Ozon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ozon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mohawk Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mohawk Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ozon.jpeg
Ozon
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mohawk-industries.jpeg
Mohawk Industries
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ozon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mohawk Industries company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mohawk Industries company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ozon company.

In the current year, Mohawk Industries company and Ozon company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mohawk Industries company nor Ozon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mohawk Industries company nor Ozon company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mohawk Industries company nor Ozon company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ozon company nor Mohawk Industries company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ozon nor Mohawk Industries holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mohawk Industries company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ozon company.

Mohawk Industries company employs more people globally than Ozon company, reflecting its scale as a Textile Manufacturing.

Neither Ozon nor Mohawk Industries holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ozon nor Mohawk Industries holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ozon nor Mohawk Industries holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ozon nor Mohawk Industries holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ozon nor Mohawk Industries holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ozon nor Mohawk Industries holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N