Comparison Overview

GE

VS

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

GE

41 Farnsworth St, Boston, MA, 02210, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

A new era is here, and we want you to be a part of it. We will now be sharing our content on our respective GE Aerospace and GE Vernova pages. Be sure to follow each to keep up with the future of aviation and energy.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 155,822
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

2−3 Marunouchi 3-Chome, Chiyoda-ku, 100-8332, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) Group is one of the world’s leading industrial firms. For more than 130 years, we have channeled big thinking into solutions that move the world forward – advancing the lives of everyone who shares our planet. We deliver innovative and integrated solutions across a wide range of industries, covering land, sea, sky and even space. MHI Group is 80,000 strong in more than 200 companies worldwide, operating in various sectors: power & energy, industrial machinery, urban infrastructure, aerospace and defense. We have a consolidated revenue of around 40 billion USD, and have consistently been a Fortune Global 500 company since the list's inception. We aim to contribute to environmental sustainability while achieving global growth, using our leading-edge technologies. By bringing people and ideas together as one, we continue to pave the way to a future of shared success. Learn more about us at https://www.mhi.com See our solutions in action at https://spectra.mhi.com Explore job opportunities at https://www.mhi.com/recruit By accessing, using or interacting with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries on LinkedIn, you accept and agree to be bound by these guidelines: https://www.mhi.com/conditions/social.html

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 15,509
Subsidiaries: 33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ge.jpeg
GE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitsubishi-heavy-industries.jpeg
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GE in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in 2025.

Incident History — GE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ge.jpeg
GE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitsubishi-heavy-industries.jpeg
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GE company.

In the current year, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company and GE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company nor GE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company nor GE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company nor GE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GE company nor Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GE nor Mitsubishi Heavy Industries holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GE company.

GE company employs more people globally than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither GE nor Mitsubishi Heavy Industries holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GE nor Mitsubishi Heavy Industries holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GE nor Mitsubishi Heavy Industries holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GE nor Mitsubishi Heavy Industries holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GE nor Mitsubishi Heavy Industries holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GE nor Mitsubishi Heavy Industries holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N