Microsoft
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
microsoft
Website:
Employees number:
220,893
Number of followers:
26,897,413
NAICS:
5112
Industry Type:
Homepage:
microsoft.com
IP Addresses:
1679
Company ID:
MIC_1267084
Scan Status:
Completed
Microsoft Company CyberSecurity Posture
microsoft.com
Every company has a mission. What's ours? To empower every person and every organization to achieve more. We believe technology can and should be a force for good and that meaningful innovation contributes to a brighter world in the future and today. Our culture doesn’t just encourage curiosity; it embraces it. Each day we make progress together by showing up as our authentic selves. We show up with a learn-it-all mentality. We show up cheering on others, knowing their success doesn't diminish our own. We show up every day open to learning our own biases, changing our behavior, and inviting in differences. Because impact matters. Microsoft operates in 190 countries and is made up of approximately 228,000 passionate employees worldwide.
Microsoft A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Microsoft Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
Microsoft
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Microsoft Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Microsoft
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Microsoft Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
45
Attack Types
5
GitHub
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: GitHub repositories were compromised, leading to the exposure of install action tokens which fortunately had a limited 24-hour lifespan, thus reducing the risk of widespread exploitation. Endor Labs found that other sensitive credentials like those for Docker, npm, and AWS were also leaked, although many repositories adhered to security best practices by referencing commit SHA values rather than mutable tags, mitigating the potential damage. Despite the reduced impact, due to the potential for threat actors to leverage GitHub Actions, users are advised to implement stricter file and folder access controls to enhance security measures and prevent similar incidents in the future.
GitHub
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The GitVenom campaign has aggressively targeted gamers and crypto investors, utilizing GitHub as a platform for hosting malicious projects. With a multitude of fake repositories that contained harmful code, the campaign has deceived users with seemingly legitimate automation tools and crypto bots. The impact of GitVenom included credential theft, unauthorized cryptocurrency transactions, and remote system control through backdoors. The damage extended to personal data compromise and financial losses for the affected users, while also tarnishing GitHub's reputation as a safe space for developers to share code.
GitHub
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region
Description: An unknown attacker is using stolen OAuth user tokens to download data from private repositories on Github. The attacker has already accessed and stolen data from dozens of victim organizations. Github immediately took action and started notifying all the impacted users and organizations about the security breach.
GitHub
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: A network named Stargazer Goblin manipulated GitHub to promote malware and phishing links, impacting the platform's integrity by boosting malicious repositories' popularity using ghost accounts. These activities aimed to deceive users seeking free software into downloading ransomware and info-stealer malware, compromising user data and potentially causing financial and reputational harm to both GitHub and its users. GitHub’s response was to disable accounts in violation of their policies and continue efforts to detect and remove harmful content.
GitHub
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: The **Banana Squad** threat group, active since April 2023, compromised over **60 GitHub repositories** by trojanizing them with **malicious Python-based hacking kits**. These repositories masqueraded as legitimate hacking tools but contained **hidden backdoor payloads**, designed to deceive developers and security researchers into downloading and executing them. The attack leveraged **supply-chain compromise tactics**, exploiting GitHub’s open-source ecosystem to distribute malware under the guise of trusted repositories. The campaign, uncovered by **ReversingLabs**, revealed that the fake repositories mimicked well-known tools, embedding **stealthy backdoor logic** that could grant attackers unauthorized access to systems, exfiltrate data, or deploy further payloads. While the **direct financial or operational damage to GitHub itself remains undisclosed**, the incident poses **severe reputational risks** to the platform, eroding trust among developers who rely on GitHub for secure code sharing. Additionally, **downstream victims**—developers or organizations that unknowingly integrated the trojanized tools—face potential **data breaches, system compromises, or lateral attacks** stemming from the malicious payloads. The attack underscores vulnerabilities in **open-source supply chains**, where threat actors exploit **typosquatting and repository spoofing** to distribute malware. Though no **large-scale data leaks or ransomware demands** were reported, the **deception-based nature of the attack** and its potential to enable **follow-on cyber intrusions** classify it as a **high-severity reputational and operational threat** to GitHub’s ecosystem.
GitHub
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The **GhostAction attack** compromised **327 GitHub accounts**, leading to the theft of **3,325 secrets**, including **PyPI, npm, DockerHub, GitHub tokens, Cloudflare, and AWS keys**. The attack began with the hijacking of the **FastUUID project**, where the maintainer’s account was breached to inject a malicious **GitHub Actions workflow** named *‘Add Github Actions Security workflow’*—designed to exfiltrate sensitive credentials. GitGuardian detected the campaign, reported it to GitHub, and disrupted the operation by rendering the exfiltration server unresponsive. While **100 of 817 affected repositories** reverted malicious changes, **573 repositories** were alerted via issue notifications (others were deleted or had issues disabled). The attack exposed **API keys, access tokens, and deployment secrets**, risking downstream supply-chain compromises. A separate but unrelated **NPM-based *s1ngularity* attack** hit **2,000 accounts** concurrently, though no overlap was found between victims.
GitHub
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: GitHub was hit by a major DDoS attack that made the website unavailable to many users for several hours. The attackers injected malicious JavaScript code into the pages of those websites that were responsible for the hijacking of their visitors to Github. Github investigated the incident and removed several repositories to secure its servers.
GitHub
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: A sophisticated **typosquatting attack** targeted GitHub via a malicious npm package **‘@acitons/artifact’** (mimicking the legitimate **‘@actions/artifact’**), accumulating **206,000+ downloads** before removal. The attack exploited developers mistyping dependency names, deploying a **post-install hook** that executed obfuscated malware undetected by antivirus tools (0/60 on VirusTotal at discovery). The malware, compiled via **Shell Script Compiler (shc)**, checked for **GitHub-specific environment variables** (e.g., build tokens) and exfiltrated **authentication tokens** from GitHub Actions workflows. These tokens could enable attackers to **publish malicious artifacts under GitHub’s identity**, risking a **cascading supply chain compromise**. The campaign used **hardcoded expiry dates** (Nov 6–7, 2023) and **AES-encrypted exfiltration** via a GitHub App endpoint, evading detection. The attack directly threatened **GitHub’s CI/CD infrastructure**, with potential downstream risks to **repositories, developers, and enterprise customers** relying on GitHub Actions. While GitHub removed the malicious packages and users, the incident highlights critical vulnerabilities in **dependency trust models** and the escalating threat of **supply chain attacks** (OWASP Top 10 2025).
GitHub
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences
Description: The GitHub Desktop for Mac and Atom programs, GitHub confirmed that threat actors exfiltrated encrypted code signing certificates. Customer data was not affected, the company claimed, because it was not kept in the affected repositories. According to the business, there is no proof that the threat actor was able to use or decrypt these certificates. According to the business, neither GitHub.com nor any of its other services have been affected by the security compromise.
GitHub
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences
Description: GitHub, the top software development platform in the world, made some users reset their passwords after discovering an issue that resulted in credentials being recorded in plain text in internal logs. A routine corporate audit uncovered the problem, which involved some users sharing on Twitter the email correspondence that the organisation had received. The business promptly stated that user data was safe and that none of its systems had been compromised. The business further stated that the plaintext passwords were not publicly available and could only be seen by a limited number of its IT workers through internal log files.
GitHub
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: GitHub experienced a ransomware attack which include at least 392 GitHub repositories. Some users who fell victim to this hacker have admitted to using weak passwords for their GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket accounts. However, all evidence suggests that the hacker has scanned the entire internet for Git config files, extracted credentials, and then used these logins to access and ransom accounts at Git hosting services. It was found that Hundreds of developers have had Git source code repositories wiped and replaced with a ransom demand.
GitHub
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: A critical vulnerability in Git CLI enables arbitrary file writes on Linux and macOS systems, allowing attackers to achieve remote code execution through maliciously crafted repositories when users execute git clone –recursive commands. This vulnerability, assigned a CVSS severity score of 8.1/10, exploits a flaw in Git's handling of configuration values and carriage return characters. Public proof-of-concept exploits are available, and urgent remediation is required across development environments.
GitHub (Microsoft)
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: GitHub’s **Copilot Chat**, an AI-powered coding assistant, was found vulnerable to a critical flaw named **CamoLeak** (CVSS 9.6), allowing attackers to exfiltrate secrets, private source code, and unpublished vulnerability details from repositories. The exploit leveraged GitHub’s invisible markdown comments in pull requests or issues—content hidden from human reviewers but parsed by Copilot Chat. By embedding malicious prompts, attackers tricked the AI into searching for sensitive data (e.g., API keys, tokens, zero-day descriptions) and encoding it as sequences of 1x1 pixel images via GitHub’s **Camo image-proxy service**. The attack bypassed GitHub’s **Content Security Policy (CSP)** by mapping characters to pre-generated Camo URLs, enabling covert data reconstruction through observed image fetch patterns. Proof-of-concept demonstrations extracted **AWS keys, security tokens, and private zero-day exploit notes**—material that could be weaponized for further attacks. GitHub mitigated the issue by disabling image rendering in Copilot Chat (August 14) and blocking Camo-based exfiltration, but the incident highlights risks of AI-assisted workflows expanding attack surfaces. Unauthorized access to proprietary code and vulnerability research poses severe threats to intellectual property and supply-chain security.
GitHub
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: A vulnerability within GitHub's CodeQL, a security analysis tool, was uncovered that had the potential to be exploited, potentially affecting a vast number of public and private repositories. Despite there being no evidence of actual misuse, the flaw could have allowed for the exfiltration of source code and secrets, jeopardizing the security of internal networks including GitHub's own systems. The vulnerability, which involved the exposure of a GitHub token, was quickly addressed by the GitHub team, showcasing their rapid and impressive response.
Microsoft
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Microsoft's Azure DevOps server was compromised in an attack by the Lapsus$ hacking group. The attackers leaked about a 9 GB zip archive containing the source code for Bing, Cortana, and other projects. Some of the compromised data contain emails and documentation that were clearly used internally by Microsoft engineers.
Microsoft
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Some of the sensitive information of Microsoft customers was exposed by a misconfigured Microsoft server accessible over the Internet in September 2022. The exposed information includes names, email addresses, email content, company name, and phone numbers, as well as files linked to business between affected customers and Microsoft or an authorized Microsoft partner. However, the leak was caused by the "unintentional misconfiguration on an endpoint that is not in use across the Microsoft ecosystem" but the SOCRadar claimed to link this sensitive information to more than 65,000 entities from 111 countries stored in files dated from 2017 to August 2022.
Microsoft
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: A significant security breach has compromised Microsoft’s PlayReady Digital Rights Management (DRM) system, exposing critical certificates that protect premium streaming content across major platforms including Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Disney+. The leak involved the unauthorized disclosure of both SL2000 and SL3000 certificates, with SL3000 representing a particularly severe security concern. These certificates utilize advanced hardware-based security measures designed to protect the highest quality content, including 4K and Ultra High Definition releases. The compromise undermines the fundamental trust model upon which DRM systems operate, posing a critical threat to the entire digital entertainment ecosystem. TorrentFreak researchers noted that the leaked SL3000 certificates could facilitate large-scale content redistribution networks, significantly escalating piracy capabilities.
Microsoft (Azure)
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromised
Description: Microsoft mitigated a record-breaking **15.72 Tbps** distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attack in late October 2023, the largest ever recorded against its Azure cloud platform. The multivector assault, peaking at **3.64 billion packets per second**, originated from the **Aisuru botnet**, exploiting compromised home routers and IoT cameras across **500,000+ source IPs** globally. While the attack targeted a single Australian endpoint, Azure’s DDoS Protection infrastructure successfully filtered and redirected traffic, preventing service disruption or data compromise. No customer workloads were affected, and operations continued uninterrupted.The attack was part of a broader surge in DDoS activity linked to Aisuru and related **TurboMirai botnets**, which had previously executed **20+ Tbps 'demonstration attacks'** primarily against internet gaming organizations. Microsoft attributed the escalation to rising residential internet speeds and the proliferation of connected devices, enabling attackers to scale attacks proportionally with global infrastructure growth. Though no data was breached or systems compromised, the incident underscored the evolving threat landscape of hyper-scale DDoS attacks leveraging vulnerable IoT ecosystems.
Microsoft (Azure)
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: Microsoft’s Azure network was targeted by the **Aisuru botnet**, a Turbo Mirai-class IoT botnet exploiting vulnerabilities in routers, IP cameras, and Realtek chips. The attack peaked at **15.72 Tbps** (terabits per second) with **3.64 billion packets per second**, originating from over **500,000 compromised IP addresses**—primarily residential devices in the U.S. and other regions. The DDoS assault leveraged **UDP floods** with minimal spoofing, targeting a public IP in Australia. While Azure mitigated the attack, the botnet’s scale and persistence posed significant risks to service availability, network integrity, and customer trust. The same botnet was linked to prior record-breaking attacks (e.g., **22.2 Tbps** against Cloudflare in September 2025), demonstrating its evolving threat capability. The incident also revealed Aisuru’s manipulation of Cloudflare’s DNS rankings by flooding its **1.1.1.1 service** with malicious queries, distorting domain popularity metrics. Though no data breach or financial loss was confirmed, the attack’s sheer volume threatened **operational disruption**, potential **reputation damage**, and **infrastructure strain**, underscoring the escalating sophistication of IoT-based cyber threats.
Microsoft
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: Microsoft suffered severe outages for some of its services, including Outlook email, OneDrive file-sharing apps, and Azure's cloud computing infrastructure. The DDoS attacks that targeted the business's services were allegedly carried out by a group going by the name of Anonymous Sudan (also known as Storm-1359). In a report titled Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, the IT giant later acknowledged it had been the target of DDoS assaults. Still, he did not disclose further information regarding the outage. The business emphasized that they had not found proof of unauthorized access to or compromise of client data.
Microsoft
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Microsoft detected Chinese threat actors employing the Quad7 botnet, also known as CovertNetwork-1658 or xlogin, in sophisticated password-spray attacks aimed at stealing credentials. These attacks targeted SOHO devices and VPN appliances, exploiting vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access to Microsoft 365 accounts. The botnet, which includes compromised TP-Link routers, relayed brute-force attacks and enabled further network exploitation. Affected sectors include government, law, defense, and NGOs in North America and Europe. The attackers, identified as Storm-0940, utilized low-volume password sprays to evade detection and maintained persistence within victims' networks for potential datapoints exfiltration.
Microsoft (Teams)
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Microsoft Teams, a globally adopted collaboration platform, has become a prime target for cybercriminals and state-sponsored actors exploiting its messaging, calls, meetings, and screen-sharing features. Threat actors leverage open-source tools (e.g., **TeamFiltration, TeamsEnum, MSFT-Recon-RS**) to enumerate users, tenants, and misconfigurations, enabling reconnaissance and initial access. Social engineering tactics—such as **tech support scams (Storm-1811, Midnight Blizzard), deepfake impersonations, and malvertising (fake Teams installers)**—trick users into granting remote access, deploying ransomware (e.g., **3AM/BlackSuit, DarkGate**), or stealing credentials via **device code phishing (Storm-2372)** and **MFA bypass (Octo Tempest)**. Post-compromise, attackers escalate privileges by abusing **Teams admin roles**, exfiltrate data via **Graph API (GraphRunner) or OneDrive/SharePoint links**, and maintain persistence through **guest user additions, token theft, and malicious Teams apps**. State-sponsored groups like **Peach Sandstorm** and financially motivated actors (**Sangria Tempest, Storm-1674**) exploit cross-tenant trust relationships for lateral movement, while tools like **ConvoC2** and **BRc4** enable C2 over Teams channels. Extortion tactics include **taunting messages to victims (Octo Tempest)** and disrupting operations by targeting high-value data (e.g., **employee/customer PII, patents, or financial records**). The attacks undermine organizational trust, risk **regulatory penalties**, and enable **supply-chain compromises** via federated identities. Microsoft’s mitigations (e.g., **Entra ID Protection, Defender XDR alerts**) highlight the platform’s systemic vulnerabilities, with ransomware and data leaks posing existential threats to targeted entities.
Microsoft (via RaccoonO365 phishing service targeting its customers)
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Microsoft disrupted **RaccoonO365**, a phishing-as-a-service operation led by Joshua Ogundipe, which stole **at least 5,000 Microsoft 365 credentials** across **94 countries** since July 2024. The service, sold via Telegram (850+ members), offered subscriptions ($335–$999) to bypass MFA, harvest credentials, and maintain persistent access—enabling **financial fraud, ransomware, and larger cyberattacks**. The stolen data was resold to criminals, while Ogundipe profited **$100,000+ in crypto**. Targets included **2,300+ US organizations** (tax-themed phishing) and **20+ healthcare providers**, prompting Health-ISAC to join Microsoft’s lawsuit. Though 338 domains were seized and Cloudflare dismantled the infrastructure, Ogundipe (Nigeria-based) remains at large. The operation’s **AI-powered scaling (RaccoonO365 AI-MailCheck)** and capacity to process **9,000 email targets/day** amplified risks of **data breaches, extortion, and supply-chain attacks** leveraging compromised Microsoft accounts.
Microsoft
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of geographical region
Description: In 2026, a low-level breach in Microsoft’s cloud infrastructure—part of the global computing backbone—was exploited by threat actors, cascading into a large-scale disruption. The attack targeted a widely deployed firewall vulnerability, compromising SaaS platforms that power critical enterprise ecosystems. This led to a domino effect, exposing sensitive data across one-eighth of the world’s networks, including financial records, proprietary business intelligence, and government-linked communications. The breach triggered outages in cloud services relied upon by Fortune 500 companies, halting operations for banks, healthcare providers, and logistics firms. While no direct ransomware was deployed, the incident eroded public trust, prompted regulatory investigations, and forced Microsoft to implement emergency patches. The economic fallout included contractual penalties, lost revenue from service downtime, and a surge in cyber insurance premiums for affected partners. Analysts warned that the attack highlighted the risks of concentrated infrastructure dependency, with nation-state actors suspected of probing for future escalations.
Microsoft
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack without any consequences
Description: The database that drives m.careersatmicrosoft.com was handled by a mobile web development company that Microsoft relied on, and it was accessible without any authentication for a few weeks. All signs pointed to the database, which was a MongoDB instance, not being write-protected. Therefore, an attacker may have altered the database and, as a result, the HTML code of the job listing pages throughout the disclosed time period. Everything was secured once Chris Vickery informed Punchkick and Microsoft of the issue.
Microsoft
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: Microsoft experienced massive data breach affecting anonymized data held on its customer support database. The data breach affected up to 250 million people as a result of the tech giant failing to implement proper protections. The information compromised included email addresses, IP addresses and support case details.
Microsoft
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: A massive dump of Microsoft's proprietary internal builds for Windows 10 has been published online, along with the source codes for proprietary software. This is the largest leak affecting Windows products; the data in the dump were probably stolen from Microsoft computers in March. Microsoft's Shared Source Kit, which comprises the source code for the Microsoft PnP and base Windows 10 hardware drivers as well as storage drivers, USB and Wi-Fi stacks, and ARM-specific OneCore kernel code, has been released. Top-secret versions of Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016 that have never been made public are included in the dump.
Microsoft
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: The VSCode Marketplace, operated by Microsoft, suffered a security lapse when two extensions embedding in-development ransomware bypassed the review process. These extensions, downloaded by a handful of users, aimed to encrypt files within a specific test folder and demanded a ransom in ShibaCoin. While the impact was minimal due to the ransomware's limited scope, it revealed significant gaps in Microsoft's review system. This incident sheds light on potential vulnerabilities within widely used developer platforms and highlights the importance of stringent security measures to prevent such breaches.
Microsoft (via malicious impersonation of Microsoft Teams)
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: The **Rhysida ransomware gang** exploited **malvertising** to impersonate **Microsoft Teams** in search engine ads (Bing), tricking users into downloading a fake installer laced with **OysterLoader malware** (also known as Broomstick/CleanUpLoader). The campaign, active since **June 2024**, used **typosquatting** and **code-signing certificates** (over 40 in the latest wave) to bypass antivirus detection, with some malware samples evading **VirusTotal** for days. Once executed, the loader deployed **Rhysida ransomware**, encrypting systems and exfiltrating data for extortion. Rhysida operates as a **RaaS (Ransomware-as-a-Service)**, with affiliates conducting attacks under the core group’s infrastructure. Since **2023**, they’ve leaked data from **~200 organizations** (27 in 2024 alone), targeting those refusing ransom payments. Microsoft revoked **200+ malicious certificates** tied to this campaign, but the gang’s **obfuscation techniques** (packing tools, delayed AV detection) ensured persistent infections. The attack chain—from **fake ads to ransomware deployment**—demonstrates a **highly coordinated, evolving threat** leveraging **trust in Microsoft’s brand** to compromise enterprises globally.
Microsoft
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks:
Description: A critical race condition vulnerability (CVE-2025-55680) in Microsoft Windows Cloud Minifilter (cldflt.sys) allowed attackers to exploit a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) weakness during placeholder file creation in cloud synchronization services like OneDrive. By manipulating filenames in memory between validation and file creation, attackers could bypass security checks and write arbitrary files—including malicious DLLs—to restricted system directories (e.g., *C:\Windows\System32*). This enabled privilege escalation to **SYSTEM-level access**, permitting arbitrary code execution.The flaw stemmed from inadequate filename validation in the *HsmpOpCreatePlaceholders()* function, a regression linked to a prior patch (CVE-2020-17136). Exploitation required only basic user privileges, posing severe risks to multi-user environments. Microsoft addressed the issue in the **October 2025 security updates**, but unpatched systems remained vulnerable to attacks leveraging DLL side-loading techniques. Organizations using cloud sync services with configured sync root directories were at heightened risk, as these were prerequisites for successful exploitation. The vulnerability carried a **CVSS 3.1 score of 7.8 (High)** and threatened system integrity, confidentiality, and availability through unauthorized privilege escalation.
Microsoft
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Microsoft encountered a security challenge when EncryptHub, also known as SkorikARI, a threat actor emerged with skills in vulnerability research. The actor, credited by Microsoft for uncovering two Windows security issues, could potentially compromise users' safety and data. The vulnerabilities, identified as high-severity CVE-2025-24061 and medium-severity CVE-2025-24071, raised concerns over the Mark of the Web security feature and Windows File Explorer, respectively. EncryptHub's background in ransomware and vishing, combined with these recent activities, signifies a mixed threat profile. Although policies and user vigilance can mitigate risks, the presence of these vulnerabilities unveiled by EncryptHub poses a direct threat to Microsoft's systems and its vast user base.
Microsoft
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Cybersecurity researchers at **Check Point** uncovered four critical vulnerabilities in **Microsoft Teams** (tracked as **CVE-2024-38197**, CVSS 6.5) that enabled attackers to manipulate conversations, impersonate high-profile executives (e.g., C-suite), and forge sender identities in messages, calls, and notifications. The flaws allowed malicious actors—both external guests and insiders—to alter message content without the 'Edited' label, modify display names in chats/calls, and exploit notifications to deceive victims into clicking malicious links or disclosing sensitive data. While Microsoft patched some issues between **August 2024 and October 2025**, the vulnerabilities eroded trust in Teams as a collaboration tool, turning it into a vector for **social engineering, data leaks, and unauthorized access**. The attack chain leveraged Teams’ messaging, calls, and screen-sharing features, enabling threat actors (including cybercriminals and state-sponsored groups) to bypass traditional defenses by exploiting **human trust** rather than technical breaches. Though no confirmed data breaches were reported, the risks included **credential theft, financial fraud, and reputational damage**—particularly if employees or customers fell victim to impersonation scams. Microsoft acknowledged Teams’ high-value target status due to its global adoption, warning that such spoofing attacks could escalate into broader **phishing campaigns or lateral movement** within corporate networks.
Microsoft
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) identified **CVE-2025-59230**, a critical **privilege escalation vulnerability** in **Windows Remote Access Connection Manager**, being actively exploited in real-world attacks. This flaw allows threat actors with limited system access to **elevate privileges**, execute malicious code with administrative rights, **exfiltrate sensitive data**, and move laterally across networks. While no direct data breach or ransomware linkage has been confirmed, the vulnerability poses severe risks if chained with other exploits—potentially enabling **full system compromise**, unauthorized data access, or disruption of operations. CISA mandated federal agencies to patch within **three weeks**, emphasizing the urgency due to active exploitation. Organizations failing to remediate risk **unauthorized access to confidential information**, **operational disruptions**, or **follow-on attacks** like data theft or ransomware deployment. The flaw’s exploitation could lead to **financial fraud, reputational damage, or regulatory penalties** if sensitive data is exposed or systems are hijacked for malicious purposes.
Microsoft
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Microsoft disclosed **CVE-2025-59499**, a critical **SQL injection vulnerability** in **SQL Server** that enables authenticated attackers to escalate privileges remotely over a network. The flaw (CWE-89) arises from improper neutralization of SQL commands, risking unauthorized administrative access to enterprise databases. With a **CVSS 3.1 score of 7.7–8.8**, it poses a high-risk threat due to its **network-based attack vector**, low exploitation complexity, and lack of user interaction requirements. Successful exploitation could lead to **data manipulation, exfiltration, or deletion**, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Although Microsoft assesses exploitation as *‘Less Likely’* currently, the vulnerability’s **high-impact potential**—coupled with its appeal to insider threats or credential-compromised actors—demands urgent patching. Organizations handling **sensitive or critical data** in SQL Server environments are particularly exposed. The absence of public PoC exploits or confirmed wild attacks does not mitigate the risk, as sophisticated adversaries may weaponize it once technical details emerge. Microsoft advises **immediate patching**, access control reviews, and monitoring for suspicious privilege escalation attempts to prevent database takeovers.
Microsoft
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Microsoft faced a cyberattack where the CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability in the Defender SmartScreen was exploited to deliver information stealers such as ACR Stealer, Lumma, and Meduza, affecting users in Spain, Thailand, and the US. Attackers utilized crafted links to bypass security features and install malware that stole data and targeted specific regions. Despite Microsoft releasing a patch for the vulnerability, the attack compromised personal and potentially sensitive information. Organizational cybersecurity defenses were challenged by the innovative methods used by the attackers, underscoring the criticality of awareness and proactive security measures.
Microsoft
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: In May, Microsoft introduced Recall, an AI that takes screenshots every five seconds for user convenience. However, concerns were raised about privacy and security, leading to delayed launch and modifications. Despite these changes, Tom's Hardware testing revealed the 'filter sensitive information' feature failed to prevent gathering sensitive data. Specifically, Recall captured credit card numbers, social security numbers, and other personal data while filling out a Notepad window and a loan application PDF, compromising users' financial information and privacy.
Microsoft
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: A critical **token validation failure (CVE-2025-55241, CVSS 10.0)** in **Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD)** was discovered by researcher **Dirk-jan Mollema**, enabling attackers to **impersonate any user—including Global Administrators—across any tenant** without exploitation evidence. The flaw stemmed from **improper tenant validation in the deprecated Azure AD Graph API** and misuse of **S2S actor tokens**, allowing **cross-tenant access** while bypassing **MFA, Conditional Access, and logging**.An attacker exploiting this could **create admin accounts, exfiltrate sensitive data (user info, BitLocker keys, tenant settings, Azure subscriptions), and fully compromise services** like **SharePoint Online, Exchange Online, and Azure-hosted resources**. The **legacy API’s lack of logging** meant **no traces** of intrusion would remain. Microsoft patched it on **July 17, 2025**, but the **deprecated API’s retirement (August 31, 2025)** left lingering risks for un migrated apps.Security firms like **Mitiga** warned of **full tenant takeover risks**, emphasizing how **misconfigurations in cloud identity systems** (e.g., OAuth, Intune, APIM) could lead to **lateral movement, privilege escalation, and persistent access**—exposing **enterprise data, financial records, and operational control** to silent, high-impact breaches.
Microsoft
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: The **CVE-2025-59287** vulnerability in **Windows Server Update Services (WSUS)** is under active exploitation by threat actors, including a newly identified group (**UNC6512**). The flaw, stemming from **insecure deserialization of untrusted data**, allows **unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE)** on vulnerable systems running WSUS (Windows Server 2012–2025). Despite Microsoft’s emergency patch, attackers continue exploiting it, with **~100,000 exploitation attempts detected in a week** and **~500,000 internet-facing WSUS servers at risk**. Attackers leverage exposed WSUS instances (ports **8530/HTTP, 8531/HTTPS**) to execute **PowerShell reconnaissance commands** (e.g., `whoami`, `net user /domain`, `ipconfig /all`) and **exfiltrate system data** via Webhook.site. While current attacks focus on **initial access and internal network mapping**, experts warn of **downstream risks**, including **malicious software distribution via WSUS updates** to enterprise systems. The flaw’s **low attack complexity** and **publicly available PoC** make it a prime target for opportunistic threat actors. Microsoft’s **failed initial patch** (October Patch Tuesday) and delayed acknowledgment of active exploitation exacerbate risks, leaving organizations vulnerable to **large-scale compromises**. The potential for **supply-chain attacks** via WSUS—used to push updates to thousands of endpoints—poses **catastrophic downstream effects**, though full-scale damage remains unquantified.
Microsoft
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region
Description: A zero-day remote code execution vulnerability named 'Follina' in Microsoft Office discovered recently has the potential for code execution if a victim opens a malicious document in Word. The vulnerability abuses the ability of MSDT to load other assistants “wizards” in Windows, which in turn have the ability to execute arbitrary code from a remote location. It can also allow the attacker to view and edit files, install programs and create new user accounts to the limit of the compromised user’s access rights. The initial versions spotted in the wild required the target to open the malicious document in Word, but the recently discovered variant uses Rich Text Format (.RTF) works only if the user simply selects the file in Windows Explorer. Microsoft has yet not issued a patch but has suggested disabling the MSDT URL Protocol to cut off the attack sequence.
Microsoft
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: In March 2021, Microsoft encountered a massive security breach that affected over 30,000 organizations in the U.S., ranging from businesses to government agencies. This attack was notably significant due to its broad impact and the exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software. The attackers were able to gain access to email accounts, and also install additional malware to facilitate long-term access to victim environments. Given the scale and the method of attack—exploiting software vulnerabilities—the incident highlighted critical concerns regarding software security and the necessity for timely updates and patches. The breach not only compromised sensitive information but also eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures, pushing the company to swiftly address the vulnerabilities and enhance their security posture to prevent future incidents. The repercussions of the attack underscored the importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilance in a landscape where threats are continuously evolving.
Microsoft
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Microsoft's Windows Explorer is affected by RenderShock, a zero-click attack that exploits passive file preview and indexing behaviors. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute malicious payloads without user interaction, potentially leading to credential theft, remote access, and data leaks. The attack methodology leverages built-in system automation features, making it difficult to detect and mitigate. Security teams are advised to disable preview panes and block SMB traffic to prevent such attacks.
Microsoft AI exits, Gemini upgrade, OpenAI breach exposed | Ep. 20
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Hello and welcome to 2-Minute Tech Briefing from Computerworld. I'm your host Arnold Davick, reporting from the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. Here are the top IT news stories you need to know for Tuesday, December 2nd. Let's dive in! First up from NetworkWorld. Microsoft is facing new pressure in its AI infrastructure push. This comes after losing two senior leaders responsible for data center and energy strategy, Nidhi Chappelle, head of AI infrastructure, and Sean James, Senior Director of Energy and data center research, both announced their departures, while Chappelle has not announced her next move. James is heading to Nvidia, intensifying competitive heat in the GPU arms race. Their exits come as Microsoft grapples with power constraints grid interconnection delays and the challenge of sourcing enough accelerators to meet skyrocketing demand. And from InfoWorld, Google has rolled out major updates to its Gemini API. The changes are designed to support the newly released Gemini 3 model. The improvements include simpler controls for managing the model's thinking. A new parameter called thinking level lets developers choose how deeply Gemini reasons before responding. It can be set to high for complex analysis or low for faster, lower cost tasks. The updates aim to strengthen Gemini 3's reasoning, autonomous coding and agentic intelligence capabilities. And finally, from CSO online, open AI is acknowledging a data breach. This after attackers compromised its
microsoft-ai
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: The Microsoft AI research division unintentionally published 38TB of critical information while posting a container of open-source training data on GitHub, according to cybersecurity company Wiz. Secrets, private keys, passwords, and more than 30,000 internal Microsoft Teams communications were discovered in a disk backup of the workstations of two workers that was made public by the disclosed data. Wiz emphasized that because Microsoft does not offer a centralized method to manage SAS tokens within the Azure interface, it is difficult to track them. Microsoft claimed that the data lead did not reveal customer data, that no customer data was leaked, and that this vulnerability did not put any internal services at risk.
Microsoft Cloud
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region
Description: A critical vulnerability in Microsoft's Azure Automation service could have permitted unauthorized access to other Azure customer accounts. By exploiting the bug, the attacker could get full control over resources and data belonging to the targeted account, depending on the permissions assigned by the customer. Several companies including a telecommunications company, two car manufacturers, a banking conglomerate, and big four accounting firms, among others, the Israeli cloud infrastructure security company were targeted by exploiting this vulnerability. However, the issue was identified and was remediated in a patch pushed in December 2021.
Microsoft Cloud
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Microsoft mitigated a security flaw affecting Azure Synapse and Azure Data Factory that could lead to Any malicious actor could have weaponized the bug to acquire the Azure Data Factory service certificate and access another tenant's Integration Runtimes to gain access to sensitive information. However, no evidence of misuse or malicious activity associated with the vulnerability in the wild was reported yet.
Microsoft Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Microsoft
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)
Microsoft has 1624.14% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Microsoft has 1182.05% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types Microsoft vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Microsoft reported 10 incidents this year: 3 cyber attacks, 1 ransomware, 5 vulnerabilities, 1 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — Microsoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Microsoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Microsoft Company Subsidiaries
Every company has a mission. What's ours? To empower every person and every organization to achieve more. We believe technology can and should be a force for good and that meaningful innovation contributes to a brighter world in the future and today. Our culture doesn’t just encourage curiosity; it embraces it. Each day we make progress together by showing up as our authentic selves. We show up with a learn-it-all mentality. We show up cheering on others, knowing their success doesn't diminish our own. We show up every day open to learning our own biases, changing our behavior, and inviting in differences. Because impact matters. Microsoft operates in 190 countries and is made up of approximately 228,000 passionate employees worldwide.
Loading...
Microsoft Similar Companies
Shopee
Shopee is the leading e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. It is a platform tailored for the region, providing customers with an easy, secure and fast online shopping experience through strong payment and logistical support. Shopee aims to continually enhance its platform and become th
Catalyzing the era of pervasive intelligence, Synopsys delivers trusted and comprehensive silicon to systems design solutions, from electronic design automation to silicon IP and system verification and validation. We partner closely with semiconductor and systems customers across a wide range of
GlobalLogic
GlobalLogic, a Hitachi Group company, is a trusted partner in design, data, and digital engineering for the world’s largest and most innovative companies. Since our inception in 2000, we have been at the forefront of the digital revolution, helping to create some of the most widely used digital prod
Dassault Systèmes
Dassault Systèmes is a catalyst for human progress. Since 1981, the company has pioneered virtual worlds to improve real life for consumers, patients and citizens. With Dassault Systèmes’ 3DEXPERIENCE platform, 370,000 customers of all sizes, in all industries, can collaborate, imagine and create
Alibaba Group
🌍Alibaba Group is on a mission to make it easy to do business anywhere! Guided by our passion and imagination, we’re leading the way in AI, cloud computing and e-commerce. We aim to build the future infrastructure of commerce, and we aspire to be a good company that lasts for 102 years.
The Bosch Group is a leading global supplier of technology and services. It employs roughly 417,900 associates worldwide (as of December 31, 2024). According to preliminary figures, the company generated sales of 90.5 billion euros in 2024. Its operations are divided into four business sectors: Mobi
Just Eat Takeaway.com
Just Eat Takeaway.com is a leading global online delivery marketplace, connecting consumers and restaurants through our platform in 17 countries. Like a dinner table, working at JET brings our office employees and couriers together. From coding to customer service to couriers, JET is a
DoorDash
At DoorDash, our mission to empower local economies shapes how our team members move quickly and always learn and reiterate to support merchants, Dashers and the communities we serve. We are a technology and logistics company that started with door-to-door delivery, and we are looking for team membe
As a global leader in business cloud software specialized by industry. Infor develops complete solutions for its focus industries, including industrial manufacturing, distribution, healthcare, food & beverage, automotive, aerospace & defense, hospitality, and high tech. Infor’s mission-critical ente
.png)
Microsoft CyberSecurity News
December 05, 2025 02:00 PM
Hackers Exploiting Microsoft Teams Notifications to Deliver CallBack Phishing Attack
Cybersecurity researchers have identified a sophisticated phishing campaign that exploits Microsoft Teams notifications to deceive users...
December 05, 2025 11:58 AM
Introducing Sophos Intelix for Microsoft 365 Copilot
We're thrilled to unveil Sophos Intelix for Microsoft 365 Copilot, a powerful new integration that brings world-class threat intelligence...
December 05, 2025 11:57 AM
Introducing Sophos Intelix for Microsoft Security Copilot
Sophos is excited to announce the launch of the new Sophos Intelix for Microsoft Security Copilot agent, now available in the Security...
December 05, 2025 08:51 AM
Hackers Abuse Microsoft Teams Notifications to Launch Callback Phishing Attacks
A phishing campaign is targeting users through Microsoft Teams notifications, exploiting the platform's trusted status to deliver deceptive...
December 04, 2025 05:25 PM
Silver Fox Uses Fake Microsoft Teams Installer to Spread ValleyRAT Malware in China
The threat actor known as Silver Fox has been spotted orchestrating a false flag operation to mimic a Russian threat group in attacks...
December 04, 2025 05:00 PM
Cybersecurity strategies to prioritize now
Learn how to strengthen cyber hygiene, modernize security standards, leverage fingerprinting, and more to defend against today's evolving...
December 04, 2025 04:41 PM
Microsoft Patches Decade-Old Windows .LNK Vulnerability in Latest Update
In the ever-evolving world of cybersecurity, Microsoft has once again demonstrated its approach to vulnerability management by quietly...
December 04, 2025 12:46 PM
Microsoft Silently Activates Critical Windows Security Update
It has only taken eight years, but Microsoft has finally activated a crucial silent security update for millions of Windows users.
December 03, 2025 05:46 PM
Microsoft Silently Patches Windows LNK Flaw After Years of Active Exploitation
Microsoft fixes the Windows LNK flaw CVE-2025-9491, a bug exploited by multiple state groups since 2017.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Microsoft CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Microsoft
The official website of Microsoft is https://news.microsoft.com/.
Microsoft’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Microsoft’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 745, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does Microsoft’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Microsoft currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Microsoft have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Microsoft is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Microsoft have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Microsoft does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Microsoft comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Microsoft is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Microsoft have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Microsoft does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Microsoft comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Microsoft is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Microsoft have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Microsoft is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Microsoft
Microsoft operates primarily in the Software Development industry.
Number of Employees at Microsoft
Microsoft employs approximately 220,893 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Microsoft
Microsoft presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Microsoft’s LinkedIn Followers
Microsoft’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 26,897,413 followers.
NAICS Classification of Microsoft
Microsoft is classified under the NAICS code 5112, which corresponds to Software Publishers.
Microsoft’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Microsoft does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Microsoft’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Microsoft maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Microsoft
As of December 11, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Microsoft has experienced 45 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Microsoft has an estimated 27,532 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Microsoft ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak, Vulnerability, Breach, Ransomware and Cyber Attack.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Microsoft ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $2.12 million.
How does Microsoft detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with notifying impacted users and organizations, and communication strategy with notifying impacted users and organizations, and containment measures with removed several repositories, and remediation measures with patch released in december 2021, and remediation measures with mitigated the security flaw, and containment measures with disabling the msdt url protocol, and third party assistance with chris vickery, and containment measures with secured the database, and third party assistance with wiz, and containment measures with password reset, and communication strategy with public statement, and remediation measures with addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture, and remediation measures with patch released, and containment measures with disabled ghost accounts, and remediation measures with continued detection and removal of harmful content, and remediation measures with implement stricter file and folder access controls, and remediation measures with vulnerability addressed by github team, and containment measures with disable preview panes, containment measures with block outbound smb traffic, containment measures with enforce macro blocking, and remediation measures with deploy behavioral monitoring, and enhanced monitoring with monitor preview-related processes like explorer.exe, searchindexer.exe, and quicklookd, and containment measures with upgrade to patched git versions, containment measures with avoid using github desktop for macos until patched, and remediation measures with upgrade to patched git versions, remediation measures with monitoring for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, and enhanced monitoring with monitoring for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, and containment measures with dmca takedown notices, containment measures with account suspensions, and and third party assistance with gitguardian (detection/alerting), third party assistance with pypi (mitigation), and containment measures with shut down exfiltration server, containment measures with reverted malicious commits, containment measures with read-only mode for compromised project, and remediation measures with alerted affected users via github issues, remediation measures with removed malicious workflows, and recovery measures with account recovery for legitimate owners, and communication strategy with public report by gitguardian, communication strategy with direct notifications to repository owners, and third party assistance with reversinglabs (discovery and analysis), and remediation measures with github may take down malicious repositories (not explicitly stated), and communication strategy with reversinglabs blog post (public disclosure), and and containment measures with patch deployed by microsoft on july 17, 2025, containment measures with deprecation and retirement of azure ad graph api (effective august 31, 2025), containment measures with migration guidance to microsoft graph for affected applications, and remediation measures with no customer action required (server-side patch), remediation measures with encouragement to migrate from azure ad graph api to microsoft graph, remediation measures with review of applications with extended access to azure ad graph api, and communication strategy with public disclosure via microsoft security response center (msrc), communication strategy with technical blog post by researcher dirk-jan mollema, communication strategy with advisories from cloud security firms (e.g., mitiga), and and third party assistance with cloudflare, third party assistance with health-isac, and law enforcement notified with criminal referral to international law enforcement (ogundipe), and containment measures with seizure of 338 raccoono365 websites, containment measures with cloudflare takedown of domains/worker accounts, containment measures with interstitial 'phish warning' pages, containment measures with termination of workers scripts, containment measures with suspension of user accounts, and remediation measures with lawsuit against ogundipe and associates, remediation measures with restraining order (limited to us jurisdiction), and communication strategy with public disclosure via microsoft/cloudflare blogs, communication strategy with coordination with health-isac, and incident response plan activated with recommended (microsoft defender xdr playbooks, entra id protection), and third party assistance with microsoft detection and response team (dart), third party assistance with microsoft threat intelligence center (mstic), third party assistance with managed security service providers (mssps), and law enforcement notified with likely (for state-sponsored or large-scale financial crimes), and containment measures with isolate compromised accounts/devices, containment measures with disable external access (federation, guest users), containment measures with revoke suspicious oauth tokens, containment measures with block malicious ips/domains (defender for office 365), containment measures with quarantine phishing emails/teams messages, and remediation measures with password resets for affected users, remediation measures with mfa re-enrollment, remediation measures with patch teams clients/endpoints, remediation measures with remove persistent backdoors (e.g., sticky keys, startup tasks), remediation measures with audit entra id configurations (pim, conditional access), and recovery measures with restore teams data from backups (if ransomware), recovery measures with rebuild compromised tenants (in severe cases), recovery measures with user training (phishing simulations, social engineering awareness), recovery measures with enhanced logging (teams audit logs, defender xdr), and communication strategy with internal advisories (it teams, executives), communication strategy with customer notifications (if data breached), communication strategy with public disclosures (for transparency, e.g., microsoft security blog), communication strategy with regulatory reporting (as required by law), and adaptive behavioral waf with recommended (microsoft defender for cloud apps), and on demand scrubbing services with available (microsoft purview data lifecycle management), and network segmentation with critical (isolate teams from high-value assets), and enhanced monitoring with defender xdr alerts (e.g., anomalous teams logins), enhanced monitoring with entra id risk policies (impossible travel, leaked credentials), enhanced monitoring with siem integration (microsoft sentinel), enhanced monitoring with teams-specific hunting queries (e.g., external file shares), and and third party assistance with legit security (researcher omer mayraz), third party assistance with hackerone (vulnerability disclosure), and containment measures with disabled image rendering in copilot chat (2024-08-14), containment measures with blocked camo image-proxy exfiltration route, and remediation measures with long-term fix under development, and incident response plan activated with cisa binding operational directive (bod) 22-01, and containment measures with isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patches cannot be applied, and remediation measures with apply microsoft’s security updates for cve-2025-59230, remediation measures with follow bod 22-01 guidance for securing cloud-based services, and communication strategy with cisa advisory (kev catalog inclusion), communication strategy with public warning via media (e.g., google news, linkedin, x), and enhanced monitoring with recommended for detecting exploitation attempts, and third party assistance with exodus intelligence (vulnerability discovery), and containment measures with october 2025 security updates (patch release), and remediation measures with apply microsoft security updates (october 2025), remediation measures with prioritize patching systems with cloud sync root directories, and incident response plan activated with microsoft (emergency patch), incident response plan activated with threat intelligence teams (e.g., google threat intelligence group, palo alto networks unit 42, trend micro zdi), and third party assistance with google threat intelligence group (gtig), third party assistance with palo alto networks unit 42, third party assistance with trend micro zero day initiative (zdi), and containment measures with emergency patch (microsoft), containment measures with network segmentation (recommended), containment measures with disabling internet-facing wsus instances, and remediation measures with apply microsoft's emergency patch, remediation measures with monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., powershell commands, data exfiltration), and communication strategy with public advisories by microsoft and cisa, communication strategy with media coverage (e.g., the register), and network segmentation with recommended to limit exposure of wsus servers, and enhanced monitoring with monitor for powershell commands (e.g., whoami, net user, ipconfig), enhanced monitoring with check for exfiltration to webhook.site endpoints, and incident response plan activated with likely by affected organizations, incident response plan activated with microsoft revoked 200+ malicious certificates, and third party assistance with expel (threat intelligence tracking), third party assistance with microsoft threat intelligence team, and containment measures with microsoft revoked malicious certificates, containment measures with av vendors updating detection signatures, and remediation measures with removal of oysterloader/latrodectus malware, remediation measures with patch management for exploited vulnerabilities, and recovery measures with restoration from backups (if available), recovery measures with rebuilding compromised systems, and communication strategy with expel blog post (2024-10-18), communication strategy with microsoft social media advisory (2024-10-15), and network segmentation with recommended for affected organizations, and enhanced monitoring with expel tracking indicators on github, enhanced monitoring with recommended for potential targets, and incident response plan activated with yes (responsible disclosure by check point, patch development by microsoft), and third party assistance with check point (vulnerability research and disclosure), and containment measures with patches released in august 2024 (cve-2024-38197), containment measures with subsequent patches in september 2024 and october 2025, and remediation measures with software updates for microsoft teams, remediation measures with security advisories for users (e.g., warning about social engineering risks), and communication strategy with public disclosure by check point and the hacker news, communication strategy with microsoft security advisory (released in september 2024), and remediation measures with patch affected sql server instances, remediation measures with review and enforce principle-of-least-privilege access controls, remediation measures with monitor sql server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, and communication strategy with public disclosure via microsoft advisory, communication strategy with recommendations for urgent patching and access control reviews, and enhanced monitoring with sql server logs for suspicious activity, and and third party assistance with veracode threat research, and containment measures with npm package removal ('@acitons/artifact'), containment measures with removal of two github user accounts linked to malware, containment measures with blocking 12 versions of related package '8jfiesaf83', and remediation measures with veracode package firewall protection for customers, remediation measures with advisory for github actions users to scrutinize dependencies, and communication strategy with public disclosure by veracode, communication strategy with media coverage (e.g., gbh), and enhanced monitoring with recommended for github actions environments, and and containment measures with mitigation of udp flood traffic, containment measures with traceback and enforcement by isps, containment measures with redaction/hiding of malicious domains in cloudflare rankings, and remediation measures with cloudflare’s adjustment of dns ranking algorithm, remediation measures with removal of aisuru-linked domains from public rankings, and communication strategy with public disclosure by microsoft and cloudflare, communication strategy with media coverage by infosec journalists (e.g., brian krebs), and enhanced monitoring with increased ddos mitigation capabilities (cloudflare, microsoft), and and containment measures with azure ddos protection infrastructure filtering, containment measures with traffic redirection, and remediation measures with botnet ip blocking, remediation measures with enhanced monitoring for aisuru/turbomirai activity, and communication strategy with public blog post by microsoft, communication strategy with media statements, and and and incident response plan activated with anticipated: national cyber-resilience mandates (u.s. 2026) will require standardized response plans for critical infrastructure., and third party assistance with expected collaboration between cisa, sector regulators, insurers, and private-sector partners for threat validation., and law enforcement notified with mandatory for critical infrastructure breaches under 2026 regulations., and containment measures with zero-trust architectures (extended to ai agents), containment measures with continuous context-aware verification (for identity sprawl), containment measures with mandatory mfa enforcement (cloud providers), containment measures with network segmentation (critical infrastructure), and remediation measures with ai-specific credential management, remediation measures with iam system consolidation, remediation measures with supply chain risk assessments, remediation measures with resilience metrics reporting (for regulatory compliance), and recovery measures with public-private threat intelligence sharing, recovery measures with insurance-linked incentives for cyber hygiene, recovery measures with investor penalties for poor resilience, and communication strategy with transparency mandates for breaches affecting critical infrastructure or ai systems., and network segmentation with critical for containing cascading failures in cloud backbones., and enhanced monitoring with required for ai agents and autonomous systems...
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Microsoft Azure DevOps Server Compromise
Description: Microsoft's Azure DevOps server was compromised in an attack by the Lapsus$ hacking group. The attackers leaked about a 9 GB zip archive containing the source code for Bing, Cortana, and other projects. Some of the compromised data contain emails and documentation that were clearly used internally by Microsoft engineers.
Type: Data Breach
Threat Actor: Lapsus$ hacking group
Title: Github OAuth Token Theft Incident
Description: An unknown attacker is using stolen OAuth user tokens to download data from private repositories on Github. The attacker has already accessed and stolen data from dozens of victim organizations. Github immediately took action and started notifying all the impacted users and organizations about the security breach.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Stolen OAuth Tokens
Vulnerability Exploited: OAuth Token Theft
Threat Actor: Unknown
Motivation: Data Theft
Title: GitHub DDoS Attack
Description: GitHub was hit by a major DDoS attack that made the website unavailable to many users for several hours. The attackers injected malicious JavaScript code into the pages of those websites that were responsible for the hijacking of their visitors to GitHub. GitHub investigated the incident and removed several repositories to secure its servers.
Type: DDoS Attack
Attack Vector: Malicious JavaScript Injection
Title: Critical Vulnerability in Microsoft's Azure Automation Service
Description: A critical vulnerability in Microsoft's Azure Automation service could have permitted unauthorized access to other Azure customer accounts. By exploiting the bug, the attacker could get full control over resources and data belonging to the targeted account, depending on the permissions assigned by the customer. Several companies including a telecommunications company, two car manufacturers, a banking conglomerate, and big four accounting firms, among others, the Israeli cloud infrastructure security company were targeted by exploiting this vulnerability. However, the issue was identified and was remediated in a patch pushed in December 2021.
Date Resolved: December 2021
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Vulnerability Exploited: Azure Automation Service Vulnerability
Motivation: Unauthorized Access to Resources and Data
Title: Microsoft Azure Synapse and Azure Data Factory Security Flaw
Description: Microsoft mitigated a security flaw affecting Azure Synapse and Azure Data Factory that could lead to any malicious actor acquiring the Azure Data Factory service certificate and accessing another tenant's Integration Runtimes to gain access to sensitive information. No evidence of misuse or malicious activity associated with the vulnerability in the wild was reported yet.
Type: Security Flaw
Attack Vector: Exploiting a vulnerability to acquire service certificate and access Integration Runtimes
Vulnerability Exploited: Azure Data Factory service certificate vulnerability
Motivation: Unauthorized access to sensitive information
Title: Follina Zero-Day Vulnerability
Description: A zero-day remote code execution vulnerability named 'Follina' in Microsoft Office discovered recently has the potential for code execution if a victim opens a malicious document in Word. The vulnerability abuses the ability of MSDT to load other assistants “wizards” in Windows, which in turn have the ability to execute arbitrary code from a remote location. It can also allow the attacker to view and edit files, install programs and create new user accounts to the limit of the compromised user’s access rights. The initial versions spotted in the wild required the target to open the malicious document in Word, but the recently discovered variant uses Rich Text Format (.RTF) works only if the user simply selects the file in Windows Explorer.
Type: Zero-Day Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious DocumentRich Text Format (.RTF)
Vulnerability Exploited: Follina
Title: Microsoft Customer Data Exposure
Description: Sensitive information of Microsoft customers was exposed by a misconfigured Microsoft server accessible over the Internet in September 2022. The exposed information includes names, email addresses, email content, company name, and phone numbers, as well as files linked to business between affected customers and Microsoft or an authorized Microsoft partner.
Date Detected: September 2022
Type: Data Exposure
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Server
Vulnerability Exploited: Unintentional Misconfiguration
Title: Microsoft Data Breach
Description: Microsoft experienced a massive data breach affecting anonymized data held on its customer support database. The data breach affected up to 250 million people as a result of the tech giant failing to implement proper protections. The information compromised included email addresses, IP addresses, and support case details.
Type: Data Breach
Title: GitHub Ransomware Attack
Description: GitHub experienced a ransomware attack which included at least 392 GitHub repositories. Some users who fell victim to this hacker have admitted to using weak passwords for their GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket accounts. However, all evidence suggests that the hacker has scanned the entire internet for Git config files, extracted credentials, and then used these logins to access and ransom accounts at Git hosting services. It was found that hundreds of developers have had Git source code repositories wiped and replaced with a ransom demand.
Type: Ransomware
Attack Vector: Weak PasswordsCredential Scanning
Vulnerability Exploited: Weak Passwords
Motivation: Financial
Title: Microsoft Services Outage Due to DDoS Attacks
Description: Microsoft suffered severe outages for some of its services, including Outlook email, OneDrive file-sharing apps, and Azure's cloud computing infrastructure. The DDoS attacks were allegedly carried out by a group going by the name of Anonymous Sudan (also known as Storm-1359).
Type: DDoS Attack
Attack Vector: Layer 7 DDoS
Threat Actor: Anonymous SudanStorm-1359
Title: Unsecured Database Exposure at Microsoft Careers Site
Description: The database driving m.careersatmicrosoft.com, handled by a mobile web development company, was accessible without authentication for a few weeks. The MongoDB instance was not write-protected, allowing potential alterations to the database and HTML code of job listing pages. The issue was secured after notification by Chris Vickery.
Type: Data Exposure
Attack Vector: Unsecured Database
Vulnerability Exploited: Lack of Authentication
Title: Microsoft AI Research Division Data Leak
Description: The Microsoft AI research division unintentionally published 38TB of critical information while posting a container of open-source training data on GitHub.
Type: Data Leak
Attack Vector: Accidental Data Exposure
Vulnerability Exploited: Improper data management practices
Title: GitHub Desktop for Mac and Atom Code Signing Certificates Exfiltration
Description: The GitHub Desktop for Mac and Atom programs, GitHub confirmed that threat actors exfiltrated encrypted code signing certificates. Customer data was not affected, the company claimed, because it was not kept in the affected repositories. According to the business, there is no proof that the threat actor was able to use or decrypt these certificates. According to the business, neither GitHub.com nor any of its other services have been affected by the security compromise.
Type: Data Exfiltration
Attack Vector: Exfiltration of Code Signing Certificates
Title: Microsoft Windows 10 Source Code Leak
Description: A massive dump of Microsoft's proprietary internal builds for Windows 10 has been published online, along with the source codes for proprietary software. This is the largest leak affecting Windows products; the data in the dump were probably stolen from Microsoft computers in March. Microsoft's Shared Source Kit, which comprises the source code for the Microsoft PnP and base Windows 10 hardware drivers as well as storage drivers, USB and Wi-Fi stacks, and ARM-specific OneCore kernel code, has been released. Top-secret versions of Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016 that have never been made public are included in the dump.
Date Detected: March
Type: Data Leak
Title: GitHub Plain Text Password Logging Incident
Description: GitHub discovered an issue resulting in credentials being recorded in plain text in internal logs, prompting some users to reset their passwords.
Type: Data Exposure
Attack Vector: Internal Logging Error
Vulnerability Exploited: Internal Logging Mechanism
Title: Microsoft Exchange Server Breach
Description: In March 2021, Microsoft encountered a massive security breach that affected over 30,000 organizations in the U.S., ranging from businesses to government agencies. This attack was notably significant due to its broad impact and the exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software. The attackers were able to gain access to email accounts, and also install additional malware to facilitate long-term access to victim environments. Given the scale and the method of attack—exploiting software vulnerabilities—the incident highlighted critical concerns regarding software security and the necessity for timely updates and patches. The breach not only compromised sensitive information but also eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures, pushing the company to swiftly address the vulnerabilities and enhance their security posture to prevent future incidents. The repercussions of the attack underscored the importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilance in a landscape where threats are continuously evolving.
Date Detected: March 2021
Type: Security Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of software vulnerabilities
Vulnerability Exploited: Microsoft Exchange Server
Title: Microsoft Cyberattack via CVE-2024-21412 Vulnerability
Description: Microsoft faced a cyberattack where the CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability in the Defender SmartScreen was exploited to deliver information stealers such as ACR Stealer, Lumma, and Meduza, affecting users in Spain, Thailand, and the US. Attackers utilized crafted links to bypass security features and install malware that stole data and targeted specific regions. Despite Microsoft releasing a patch for the vulnerability, the attack compromised personal and potentially sensitive information. Organizational cybersecurity defenses were challenged by the innovative methods used by the attackers, underscoring the criticality of awareness and proactive security measures.
Type: Cyberattack
Attack Vector: Crafted links to bypass security features
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2024-21412
Motivation: Data theft
Title: Stargazer Goblin Network Manipulates GitHub to Promote Malware
Description: A network named Stargazer Goblin manipulated GitHub to promote malware and phishing links, impacting the platform's integrity by boosting malicious repositories' popularity using ghost accounts. These activities aimed to deceive users seeking free software into downloading ransomware and info-stealer malware, compromising user data and potentially causing financial and reputational harm to both GitHub and its users. GitHub's response was to disable accounts in violation of their policies and continue efforts to detect and remove harmful content.
Type: Malware Distribution and Phishing
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Malicious Links
Vulnerability Exploited: User Trust in Popular Repositories
Threat Actor: Stargazer Goblin Network
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Title: Chinese Threat Actors Employing Quad7 Botnet in Password-Spray Attacks
Description: Microsoft detected Chinese threat actors employing the Quad7 botnet, also known as CovertNetwork-1658 or xlogin, in sophisticated password-spray attacks aimed at stealing credentials. These attacks targeted SOHO devices and VPN appliances, exploiting vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access to Microsoft 365 accounts. The botnet, which includes compromised TP-Link routers, relayed brute-force attacks and enabled further network exploitation. Affected sectors include government, law, defense, and NGOs in North America and Europe. The attackers, identified as Storm-0940, utilized low-volume password sprays to evade detection and maintained persistence within victims' networks for potential datapoints exfiltration.
Type: Credential Theft
Attack Vector: Password Spray AttacksBrute-force Attacks
Vulnerability Exploited: SOHO devicesVPN appliances
Threat Actor: Storm-0940
Motivation: Credential Theft
Title: Microsoft Recall AI Privacy and Security Incident
Description: In May, Microsoft introduced Recall, an AI that takes screenshots every five seconds for user convenience. However, concerns were raised about privacy and security, leading to delayed launch and modifications. Despite these changes, Tom's Hardware testing revealed the 'filter sensitive information' feature failed to prevent gathering sensitive data. Specifically, Recall captured credit card numbers, social security numbers, and other personal data while filling out a Notepad window and a loan application PDF, compromising users' financial information and privacy.
Date Detected: May 2023
Type: Data Breach
Vulnerability Exploited: Insufficient data filtering in AI screenshot feature
Title: GitVenom Campaign
Description: The GitVenom campaign has aggressively targeted gamers and crypto investors, utilizing GitHub as a platform for hosting malicious projects. With a multitude of fake repositories that contained harmful code, the campaign has deceived users with seemingly legitimate automation tools and crypto bots. The impact of GitVenom included credential theft, unauthorized cryptocurrency transactions, and remote system control through backdoors. The damage extended to personal data compromise and financial losses for the affected users, while also tarnishing GitHub's reputation as a safe space for developers to share code.
Type: Malware Campaign
Attack Vector: Fake repositoriesMalicious code
Motivation: Credential theftUnauthorized cryptocurrency transactionsRemote system control
Title: VSCode Marketplace Ransomware Incident
Description: The VSCode Marketplace, operated by Microsoft, suffered a security lapse when two extensions embedding in-development ransomware bypassed the review process. These extensions, downloaded by a handful of users, aimed to encrypt files within a specific test folder and demanded a ransom in ShibaCoin. While the impact was minimal due to the ransomware's limited scope, it revealed significant gaps in Microsoft's review system. This incident sheds light on potential vulnerabilities within widely used developer platforms and highlights the importance of stringent security measures to prevent such breaches.
Type: Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malicious Extensions
Vulnerability Exploited: Review Process Bypass
Motivation: Financial Gain
Title: GitHub Repositories Compromised
Description: GitHub repositories were compromised, leading to the exposure of install action tokens which fortunately had a limited 24-hour lifespan, thus reducing the risk of widespread exploitation. Endor Labs found that other sensitive credentials like those for Docker, npm, and AWS were also leaked, although many repositories adhered to security best practices by referencing commit SHA values rather than mutable tags, mitigating the potential damage. Despite the reduced impact, due to the potential for threat actors to leverage GitHub Actions, users are advised to implement stricter file and folder access controls to enhance security measures and prevent similar incidents in the future.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials
Vulnerability Exploited: Exposure of Install Action Tokens
Title: GitHub CodeQL Vulnerability
Description: A vulnerability within GitHub's CodeQL, a security analysis tool, was uncovered that had the potential to be exploited, potentially affecting a vast number of public and private repositories. Despite there being no evidence of actual misuse, the flaw could have allowed for the exfiltration of source code and secrets, jeopardizing the security of internal networks including GitHub's own systems. The vulnerability, which involved the exposure of a GitHub token, was quickly addressed by the GitHub team, showcasing their rapid and impressive response.
Type: Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploit of a security analysis tool
Vulnerability Exploited: Exposure of GitHub token
Title: Microsoft Security Vulnerabilities Discovered by EncryptHub
Description: Microsoft encountered a security challenge when EncryptHub, also known as SkorikARI, a threat actor emerged with skills in vulnerability research. The actor, credited by Microsoft for uncovering two Windows security issues, could potentially compromise users' safety and data. The vulnerabilities, identified as high-severity CVE-2025-24061 and medium-severity CVE-2025-24071, raised concerns over the Mark of the Web security feature and Windows File Explorer, respectively. EncryptHub's background in ransomware and vishing, combined with these recent activities, signifies a mixed threat profile. Although policies and user vigilance can mitigate risks, the presence of these vulnerabilities unveiled by EncryptHub poses a direct threat to Microsoft's systems and its vast user base.
Type: Vulnerability Disclosure
Attack Vector: Vulnerability ResearchRansomwareVishing
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-24061CVE-2025-24071
Threat Actor: EncryptHub (SkorikARI)
Title: RenderShock Zero-Click Attack
Description: A sophisticated zero-click attack methodology called RenderShock that exploits passive file preview and indexing behaviors in modern operating systems to execute malicious payloads without requiring any user interaction.
Type: Zero-Click Attack
Attack Vector: File Preview SystemsAutomatic File Indexing Services
Vulnerability Exploited: RenderShock 0-Click Vulnerability
Motivation: Credential HarvestingRemote AccessData Exfiltration
Title: Git CLI Arbitrary File Write Vulnerability
Description: A critical vulnerability in Git CLI enables arbitrary file writes on Linux and macOS systems, with working proof-of-concept exploits now publicly available.
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: Malicious repositories via git clone –recursive commands
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-48384
Motivation: Remote Code Execution, Data Exfiltration
Title: Microsoft PlayReady DRM System Breach
Description: A significant security breach has compromised Microsoft’s PlayReady Digital Rights Management (DRM) system, exposing critical certificates that protect premium streaming content across major platforms including Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, and Disney+.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Certificate-Based Attack
Vulnerability Exploited: Unauthorized disclosure of SL2000 and SL3000 certificates
Motivation: Piracy and content redistribution
Title: GhostAction Supply-Chain Attack on GitHub
Description: A supply-chain attack dubbed 'GhostAction' targeted GitHub, stealing 3,325 secrets (e.g., PyPI, AWS keys, GitHub tokens) from 327 compromised accounts. The attack was discovered by GitGuardian, who alerted GitHub and disrupted the campaign by shutting down the exfiltration server. A separate but unrelated NPM attack ('s1ngularity') compromised 2,000 accounts around the same time.
Type: supply-chain attack
Attack Vector: compromised maintainer accountmalicious GitHub Actions workflow ('Add Github Actions Security workflow')
Vulnerability Exploited: account takeover (ATO)malicious CI/CD pipeline injection
Motivation: credential harvestingsupply-chain compromisepotential follow-on attacks
Title: Banana Squad Trojanizes Over 60 GitHub Repositories with Malicious Python Hacking Kits
Description: A threat group dubbed 'Banana Squad,' active since April 2023, has trojanized more than 60 GitHub repositories in an ongoing campaign. The repositories offer Python-based hacking kits with hidden malicious payloads, mimicking legitimate hacking tools. Discovered by ReversingLabs, these repositories inject backdoor logic while appearing identical to well-known tools. The malicious activity was uncovered by analyzing URL indicators in ReversingLabs’ network threat intelligence dataset.
Type: supply chain attack
Attack Vector: compromised GitHub repositoriessocial engineering (fake hacking tools)hidden backdoor payloads
Threat Actor: Name: Banana SquadActive Since: April 2023Type: ['cybercriminal group', 'malware distributor']
Motivation: malware distributionbackdoor accesspotential follow-on attacks
Title: Critical Token Validation Failure in Microsoft Entra ID (CVE-2025-55241)
Description: A critical token validation failure in Microsoft Entra ID (previously Azure Active Directory) could have allowed attackers to impersonate any user, including Global Administrators, across any tenant. The vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2025-55241, was assigned a CVSS score of 10.0 and stemmed from a combination of service-to-service (S2S) actor tokens issued by the Access Control Service (ACS) and a flaw in the legacy Azure AD Graph API that did not validate the originating tenant. This allowed cross-tenant access, bypassing MFA, Conditional Access, and logging. The issue was reported by security researcher Dirk-jan Mollema on July 14, 2025, and patched by Microsoft on July 17, 2025, with no evidence of exploitation in the wild.
Date Detected: 2025-07-14
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-07-17
Date Resolved: 2025-07-17
Type: Privilege Escalation
Attack Vector: NetworkToken ManipulationAPI Abuse (Azure AD Graph API)
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-55241 (Token Validation Failure in Microsoft Entra ID / Azure AD Graph API)
Title: Microsoft Seizes 338 RaccoonO365 Phishing Websites, Identifies Leader Joshua Ogundipe
Description: Microsoft's Digital Crimes Unit (DCU) seized 338 websites linked to the RaccoonO365 phishing-as-a-service operation, which sold subscriptions to phishing kits used to steal Microsoft 365 credentials. The leader, Joshua Ogundipe, was identified, and a lawsuit was filed against him and four associates. The operation targeted at least 5,000 credentials across 94 countries, generating over $100,000 in cryptocurrency. The phishing kits bypassed MFA and enabled persistent access, with stolen data used for fraud, ransomware, and further attacks. Cloudflare assisted in the takedown of domains and Worker accounts tied to RaccoonO365.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-09
Date Resolved: 2024-09
Type: phishing
Attack Vector: phishing emailsphishing kitsMFA bypassAI-powered phishing (RaccoonO365 AI-MailCheck)tax-themed phishing campaigns
Vulnerability Exploited: human vulnerability (social engineering)MFA bypass techniqueslack of user awareness
Threat Actor: Name: Joshua OgundipeAffiliation: RaccoonO365Location: NigeriaBackground: Computer programming; believed to have authored majority of the RaccoonO365 code
Motivation: financial gaincybercrime facilitationsale of stolen credentials and access
Title: Exploitation of Microsoft Teams for Cyber Attacks and Data Breaches
Description: Threat actors are increasingly abusing Microsoft Teams' collaboration features—including messaging, calls, meetings, and screen-sharing—to conduct reconnaissance, gain initial access, persist, escalate privileges, and exfiltrate data. Techniques include social engineering (e.g., tech support scams, deepfakes), malicious payload delivery (e.g., DarkGate, ReedBed, JSSloader), credential theft (e.g., MFA bypass, token hijacking), and lateral movement via compromised admin accounts or federated trust relationships. State-sponsored and financially motivated actors (e.g., Octo Tempest, Storm-1811, Midnight Blizzard, Peach Sandstorm) leverage open-source tools (e.g., TeamFiltration, ROADtools, AADInternals) and custom malware to exploit Teams' API, Graph integration, and hybrid/cloud misconfigurations. Mitigations include hardening identity protections (e.g., Entra ID risk policies, PIM), securing endpoints, monitoring for anomalous Teams activity (e.g., phishing lures, external access), and deploying Defender XDR detections.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-07-01
Type: Social Engineering
Attack Vector: Microsoft Teams Chat/Call ImpersonationMalicious File/Link Sharing (Teams channels)API Abuse (Microsoft Graph, Entra ID)Device Code PhishingMalvertising (Fake Teams installers)AiTM (Adversary-in-the-Middle) PhishingRMM Tool Deployment (e.g., AnyDesk)Federated Tenant MisconfigurationsLegitimate Admin Tools (e.g., AADInternals, PowerShell)
Vulnerability Exploited: Weak Entra ID Configurations (e.g., external access policies)Lack of MFA EnforcementOver-Permissive Guest/External User AccessUnmonitored API Queries (Graph, Teams)Default Teams App PermissionsLegacy Authentication ProtocolsInsufficient Privileged Access Controls (e.g., standing admin roles)Unpatched Teams ClientsExposed Presence/Status DataSpoofable Workflow Notifications
Threat Actor: Name: Octo Tempest, Type: Financially Motivated, Association: Ransomware, Extortion, MFA Bypass, Name: Storm-1811, Type: Financially Motivated, Association: Tech Support Scams, ReedBed Malware, Email Bombing, Name: Midnight Blizzard (APT29/Cozy Bear), Type: State-Sponsored (Russia), Association: Credential Theft, Social Engineering, Name: Storm-1674, Type: Access Broker, Association: TeamsPhisher, DarkGate Malware, Name: Sangria Tempest, Type: Financially Motivated, Association: Ransomware (3AM/BlackSuit), JSSloader, Name: Peach Sandstorm (APT33), Type: State-Sponsored (Iran), Association: Malicious ZIP Files, AD Reconnaissance, Name: Void Blizzard, Type: State-Sponsored, Association: Entra ID Enumeration, AzureHound, Name: Storm-0324, Type: Financially Motivated, Association: TeamsPhisher, Custom Malware, Name: Storm-2372, Type: Financially Motivated, Association: Device Code Phishing, Token Theft, Name: 3AM Ransomware (BlackSuit Rebrand), Type: Ransomware Operator, Association: Storm-1811 Techniques, Voice/Video Scams.
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransomware, Extortion, Fraud)Espionage (State-Sponsored Actors)Credential Harvesting (Initial Access Brokering)Disruption (Operational Sabotage)Data Theft (PII, Corporate Intelligence)
Title: CamoLeak: Critical Vulnerability in GitHub Copilot Chat Enables Code and Secret Exfiltration
Description: GitHub's Copilot Chat, an AI-powered coding assistant, was found to have a critical vulnerability (dubbed **CamoLeak**) that allowed attackers to exfiltrate secrets, private source code, and unpublished vulnerability descriptions from repositories. The flaw exploited Copilot Chat's parsing of 'invisible' markdown comments in pull requests or issues—content not visible in the standard UI but accessible to the chatbot. Attackers could embed malicious prompts instructing Copilot to search for sensitive data (e.g., API keys, tokens, zero-day descriptions) and exfiltrate it via a covert channel using GitHub's Camo image-proxy service. The vulnerability was scored **9.6 on the CVSS scale** and demonstrated in a proof-of-concept that extracted AWS keys, security tokens, and unpublished exploit details.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-08-14
Date Resolved: 2024-08-14
Type: Data Exfiltration
Attack Vector: Hidden Markdown Comments in Pull Requests/IssuesAI Prompt InjectionCamo Image-Proxy Abuse
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-Pending (CamoLeak: Copilot Chat's parsing of invisible markdown + Camo image-proxy exfiltration)
Motivation: EspionageCredential TheftExploit Development (Zero-Day Theft)
Title: Active Exploitation of Microsoft Windows Privilege Escalation Vulnerability (CVE-2025-59230)
Description: The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has added a critical Microsoft Windows vulnerability (CVE-2025-59230) to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog. The flaw, located in the Windows Remote Access Connection Manager, allows attackers with limited system access to escalate privileges, execute malicious code with elevated rights, exfiltrate sensitive data, and move laterally across networks. CISA has issued a directive (BOD 22-01) mandating federal agencies to patch the vulnerability by November 4, 2025. The vulnerability is actively exploited in real-world attacks and is often chained with other exploits in multi-stage attacks, such as those initiated via phishing or internet-facing vulnerabilities.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-14
Type: Privilege Escalation
Attack Vector: Local Privilege EscalationChained with Initial Access Exploits (e.g., Phishing, Internet-Facing Vulnerabilities)
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-59230 (Improper Access Control in Windows Remote Access Connection Manager)
Title: Critical Race Condition Vulnerability in Microsoft Windows Cloud Minifilter (CVE-2025-55680)
Description: A critical security flaw in Microsoft Windows Cloud Minifilter (cldflt.sys) was fixed, addressing a dangerous race condition (CVE-2025-55680) that enabled attackers to gain elevated system privileges (SYSTEM-level) and write files to any location on affected systems. The vulnerability, discovered by Exodus Intelligence in March 2024, was patched in Microsoft's October 2025 security updates. It arises from inadequate filename validation during placeholder file creation in cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive), allowing attackers to exploit a time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) weakness via multi-threaded attacks. This could lead to arbitrary DLL placement in restricted directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32) and privilege escalation through DLL side-loading. The flaw impacts systems running cloud sync services with configured sync root directories and relates to a previously patched issue (CVE-2020-17136).
Date Detected: 2024-03
Date Resolved: 2025-10
Type: Vulnerability
Attack Vector: LocalTime-of-Check Time-of-Use (TOCTOU)Multi-threaded Exploitation
Vulnerability Exploited: Cve Id: CVE-2025-55680, Race ConditionImproper Input ValidationMicrosoft Windows Cloud Minifilter (cldflt.sys)HsmpOpCreatePlaceholders() functionCfCreatePlaceholders() APICvss Score: {'version': '3.1', 'score': 7.8, 'severity': 'High'}, CVE-2020-17136
Title: Critical Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) RCE Vulnerability (CVE-2025-59287) Under Active Exploitation
Description: A critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in Windows Server Update Services (WSUS), tracked as CVE-2025-59287, is under active exploitation. The flaw stems from insecure deserialization of untrusted data, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable systems. Microsoft released an emergency patch after the initial Patch Tuesday fix was bypassed. Threat actors, including a newly identified group (UNC6512), are exploiting the vulnerability for reconnaissance and data exfiltration. Approximately 100,000 exploitation attempts have been observed in the last seven days, with around 500,000 internet-facing WSUS servers potentially at risk. The downstream impact could be catastrophic if compromised servers are used to push malicious updates to enterprise systems.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-10-08 (Patch Tuesday)
Type: Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Attack Vector: Network-based (TCP ports 8530/HTTP and 8531/HTTPS)Insecure DeserializationUnauthenticated Exploitation
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-59287 (Windows Server Update Services - WSUS)
Threat Actor: UNC6512Opportunistic Threat Actors (unknown groups leveraging PoC)
Motivation: Initial AccessInternal ReconnaissanceData ExfiltrationPotential Downstream Malware Distribution via WSUS
Title: Rhysida Ransomware Gang Uses Malvertising to Distribute OysterLoader and Latrodectus Malware via Fake Microsoft Teams Ads
Description: The Rhysida ransomware gang has been placing fake ads for Microsoft Teams in search engines (primarily Bing) to infect victims with OysterLoader (also known as Broomstick and CleanUpLoader) and Latrodectus malware. The campaign, ongoing since June 2024, leverages malvertising and typosquatting to trick users into downloading malicious installers. The group operates as a ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) and has compromised at least 27 organizations since June 2024, with ~200 victims posted on their leak site since 2023. The malware uses packing tools and code-signing certificates to evade detection, with Microsoft revoking over 200 certificates tied to this activity.
Date Detected: 2024-06-01
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-10-18
Type: ransomware
Attack Vector: malvertising (Bing ads)typosquattingfake Microsoft Teams download pagesmalicious installer (OysterLoader/Latrodectus)packed malware with obfuscationcode-signing certificate abuse
Vulnerability Exploited: user trust in search engine adslack of multi-factor authentication for downloadsdelayed AV detection due to obfuscationabuse of legitimate code-signing certificates
Threat Actor: Rhysida (formerly Vice Society/Vanilla Tempest)RaaS affiliates
Motivation: financial gain (ransom payments)data exfiltration for extortionselling stolen data on dark web
Title: Microsoft Teams Spoofing and Impersonation Vulnerabilities (CVE-2024-38197)
Description: Cybersecurity researchers disclosed four security flaws in Microsoft Teams that could expose users to impersonation and social engineering attacks. The vulnerabilities allowed attackers to manipulate conversations, impersonate colleagues, and exploit notifications without leaving an 'Edited' label. Attackers could alter message content, sender identity, and incoming notifications to trick victims into opening malicious messages or sharing sensitive data. The flaws also enabled modifying display names in private chats and call notifications, forging caller identities. These issues undermine trust in collaboration tools, turning Teams into a vector for deception. Microsoft addressed some of the vulnerabilities in August 2024 (CVE-2024-38197, CVSS 6.5), with subsequent patches in September 2024 and October 2025.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-03
Date Resolved: 2025-10
Type: Spoofing
Attack Vector: Message Content ManipulationSender Identity SpoofingNotification ForgeryDisplay Name Modification in Chats/CallsMalicious Link Distribution
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2024-38197 (CVSS 6.5: Medium)Three additional undisclosed vulnerabilities (details not specified)
Motivation: Social EngineeringData TheftMalware DistributionUnauthorized Access
Title: Critical SQL Injection Vulnerability in Microsoft SQL Server (CVE-2025-59499)
Description: Microsoft has disclosed a critical SQL injection vulnerability in SQL Server (CVE-2025-59499) that could allow authenticated attackers to escalate their privileges over a network. The vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands, exposing enterprise databases to potential unauthorized administrative access. It has been classified under CWE-89, with a CVSS 3.1 score ranging from 7.7 to 8.8, indicating a significant security risk. The network-based attack vector allows remote exploitation by attackers with valid SQL Server credentials, enabling manipulation, exfiltration, or deletion of sensitive data with elevated privileges.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-11-11
Type: Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network-based (Remote)
Vulnerability Exploited: Cve Id: CVE-2025-59499, Cwe Id: CWE-89, Cvss Score: 7.7 - 8.8 (CVSS 3.1), Cvss Vector: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, Severity: Important, Exploitability Assessment: Less Likely (as of disclosure), Complexity: Low, User Interaction Required: False, Impact: {'confidentiality': 'High', 'integrity': 'High', 'availability': 'High'}.
Title: Typosquatting Campaign Targeting GitHub Actions via Malicious npm Package '@acitons/artifact'
Description: On November 7th, Veracode Threat Research discovered a typosquatting campaign targeting developers using GitHub Actions. The malicious npm package '@acitons/artifact' (mimicking the legitimate '@actions/artifact') accumulated over 206,000 downloads before removal. The package contained a post-install hook that executed obfuscated malware, designed to exfiltrate GitHub authentication tokens during builds. The attack demonstrated advanced operational security, including self-termination dates and encrypted exfiltration via GitHub App-based endpoints. The campaign targeted GitHub's own repositories and posed a supply chain risk.
Date Detected: 2023-11-07
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-11-07
Type: supply chain attack
Attack Vector: typosquatting (npm package)post-install hookobfuscated shell script (shc)Node.js package with obfuscated JavaScript ('verify.js')GitHub Actions environment variables
Vulnerability Exploited: developer mistyped dependency installationlack of package verification in CI/CD pipelinesunrestricted access to GitHub Actions environment variables
Motivation: supply chain compromiseauthentication token theftimpersonation of GitHub for downstream attacks
Title: Aisuru Botnet Launches Record-Breaking 15.72 Tbps DDoS Attack on Microsoft Azure
Description: Microsoft disclosed that the Aisuru botnet executed a 15.72 Tbps DDoS attack on its Azure network, originating from over 500,000 IP addresses. The attack targeted a public IP in Australia with UDP floods reaching 3.64 billion packets per second (bpps). Aisuru, a Turbo Mirai-class IoT botnet, exploits vulnerabilities in home routers and cameras, primarily in the U.S. and other countries. The botnet was also linked to a 22.2 Tbps attack on Cloudflare in September 2025 and an 11.5 Tbps attack attributed by Qi'anxin’s XLab. Aisuru’s growth surged in April 2025 after compromising a TotoLink firmware update server, infecting ~100,000 devices. Cloudflare removed Aisuru-linked domains from its 'Top Domains' rankings after they distorted DNS query volumes, undermining trust in the system.
Type: DDoS Attack
Attack Vector: UDP FloodCompromised IoT Devices (Routers, IP Cameras, DVRs/NVRs)Exploitation of Firmware Update Server (TotoLink)
Vulnerability Exploited: Security vulnerabilities in IP camerasDVRs/NVRsRealtek chipsRouters from T-Mobile, Zyxel, D-Link, LinksysTotoLink router firmware update server
Threat Actor: Aisuru Botnet Operators
Motivation: Disrupting ServicesDistorting DNS Rankings (Cloudflare 1.1.1.1)Undermining Trust in Public RankingsPotential Financial Gain or Competitive Sabotage
Title: Record-Breaking 15.72 Tbps DDoS Attack on Microsoft Azure Mitigated
Description: Microsoft neutralized a record-breaking distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack targeting its Azure service in late October 2023. The multivector attack peaked at 15.72 Tbps and 3.64 billion packets per second, traced to the Aisuru botnet (a variant of TurboMirai), which exploits compromised home routers and cameras. The attack originated from over 500,000 source IPs globally, targeting a single endpoint in Australia. Azure’s DDoS Protection infrastructure successfully mitigated the attack without service interruption. The incident highlights the growing scale of DDoS threats driven by faster residential internet speeds and proliferating IoT devices.
Date Detected: Late October 2023
Date Publicly Disclosed: November 2023 (exact date unspecified)
Date Resolved: Late October 2023 (same day as detection)
Type: Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS)
Attack Vector: Botnet (Aisuru/TurboMirai)Compromised IoT devices (routers, cameras)Residential ISPs (primarily U.S.-based)
Vulnerability Exploited: Weak credentials/default passwords in IoT devicesUnpatched firmware in home routers/cameras
Threat Actor: Aisuru botnetTurboMirai family
Motivation: Demonstration of capabilityPotential financial gain (e.g., ransom demands or disruption-for-hire)Testing infrastructure resilience
Title: Predicted Cybersecurity Threats and Trends for 2026
Description: Security experts share predictions for incoming cyber threats in 2026, including attacks on SaaS infrastructure, AI agent vulnerabilities, identity sprawl, critical infrastructure risks, and regulatory shifts. Key concerns include concentrated infrastructure risk (e.g., Microsoft, Amazon, Google), AI-driven attacks, mandatory cyber resilience mandates, and the erosion of traditional authentication methods due to deepfakes and synthetic identities. The U.S. is expected to enforce national cyber-resilience mandates for critical infrastructure, while compliance may drive innovation in data and AI governance.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-10-01T00:00:00Z
Type: Predictive Analysis
Attack Vector: AI Agent Exploitation (e.g., autonomous decision-making, broad data access)SaaS Infrastructure Compromise (e.g., widely-deployed firewalls)Identity Sprawl (e.g., over-permissioned roles, shadow identities)Synthetic Social Engineering (e.g., deepfakes, adaptive phishing)Critical Infrastructure Targeting (e.g., energy grids, water systems)Supply Chain Attacks (e.g., multi-cloud complexities)Concentrated Infrastructure Risk (e.g., Microsoft, Amazon, Google backbones)
Vulnerability Exploited: Lack of Zero-Trust for Non-Human Identities (AI agents)Over-Permissioned IAM RolesDisconnected IAM SystemsStatic Authentication Methods (vulnerable to deepfakes)Shared Responsibility Model Gaps in Cloud SecurityOptional MFA (to be phased out)AI System Autonomy (unsupervised decision-making)Legacy Firewall Deployments (single point of failure for ecosystems)
Threat Actor: Nation-States (geopolitically motivated)Cybercriminal Syndicates (financially motivated)Initial Access Brokers (selling backdoors to high-value targets)AI-Powered Threat Actors (exploiting autonomous systems)Insider Threats (due to identity sprawl)
Motivation: Financial Gain (e.g., ransomware, data exfiltration)Geopolitical Disruption (e.g., critical infrastructure sabotage)Espionage (e.g., AI-driven data theft)Market Manipulation (e.g., disrupting cloud providers)Talent Pipeline Exploitation (e.g., targeting entry-level job gaps)
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Stolen OAuth Tokens, Azure Data Factory service certificate, Malicious Document, Weak Passwords, Microsoft Exchange Server, Crafted links, Ghost Accounts, SOHO devicesVPN appliances, Fake repositoriesMalicious code, Malicious Extensions, Helpdesk PortalsShared Directories, Malicious repositories, compromised maintainer account (FastUUID project), trojanized GitHub repositories (fake hacking tools), Legacy Azure AD Graph API (graph.windows.net) via flawed S2S actor token validation, Phishing emailsRaccoonO365 phishing kits, Compromised Teams Accounts (via phishing/credential theft)Legitimate Tenants Purchased on Dark WebExploited Guest/External Access MisconfigurationsMalicious Apps (Spoofed or Repurposed)Federated Trust Relationships (Cross-Tenant Access), Hidden markdown comments in GitHub pull requests/issues, Phishing campaignsInternet-facing vulnerabilities (potential initial access vectors), Internet-facing WSUS servers on TCP ports 8530 (HTTP) and 8531 (HTTPS), malvertising (Bing ads)fake Microsoft Teams download pages, npm package installation ('@acitons/artifact'), Exploited Vulnerabilities in IoT DevicesCompromised TotoLink Firmware Update Server, Compromised IoT devices (routers, cameras) and Compromised SaaS Firewalls (single point of failure)Over-Permissioned AI Agents (autonomous lateral movement)Shadow Identities in IAM SystemsSupply Chain Vulnerabilities (multi-cloud complexities).
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach MIC04123322
Data Compromised: Source code for bing, Source code for cortana, Emails, Documentation
Systems Affected: Azure DevOps server
Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422
Data Compromised: Private Repository Data
Systems Affected: Github Private Repositories
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522
Data Compromised: Full control over resources and data
Systems Affected: Azure Automation Service
Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Data Compromised: Sensitive information in integration runtimes
Systems Affected: Azure SynapseAzure Data Factory
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622
Systems Affected: Microsoft Office
Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122
Data Compromised: Names, Email addresses, Email content, Company name, Phone numbers, Files linked to business
Incident : Data Breach MIC234171222
Data Compromised: Email addresses, Ip addresses, Support case details
Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323
Data Compromised: Source Code Repositories
Systems Affected: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC20599723
Systems Affected: Outlook emailOneDrive file-sharing appsAzure's cloud computing infrastructure
Downtime: Severe outages
Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823
Data Compromised: Job listing data
Systems Affected: MongoDB database
Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Data Compromised: Secrets, Private keys, Passwords, Internal microsoft teams communications
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT205981023
Systems Affected: GitHub Desktop for MacAtom
Incident : Data Leak MIC2321251123
Data Compromised: Windows 10 internal builds, Microsoft shared source kit
Incident : Data Exposure GIT432251223
Data Compromised: Plain text passwords
Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Data Compromised: Email accounts, sensitive information
Systems Affected: Microsoft Exchange Server
Operational Impact: Eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures
Brand Reputation Impact: Eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures
Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Data Compromised: Personal and potentially sensitive information
Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724
Data Compromised: User Data
Systems Affected: GitHub Platform
Brand Reputation Impact: High
Identity Theft Risk: High
Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524
Systems Affected: Microsoft 365 accountsTP-Link routers
Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524
Data Compromised: Credit card numbers, Social security numbers, Other personal data
Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030225
Data Compromised: Personal data, Credentials
Brand Reputation Impact: Tarnished GitHub's reputation
Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Systems Affected: VSCode Marketplace
Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125
Data Compromised: Install action tokens, Docker credentials, Npm credentials, Aws credentials
Systems Affected: GitHub Repositories
Incident : Vulnerability GIT350040225
Data Compromised: Source code and secrets
Systems Affected: Public and private repositories, internal networks including GitHub's own systems
Incident : Vulnerability Disclosure MIC540040825
Systems Affected: Mark of the Web security featureWindows File Explorer
Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Systems Affected: Windows ExplorermacOS Quick LookEmail Client Preview SystemsFile Indexing Services
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Systems Affected: LinuxmacOS
Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425
Data Compromised: Sl2000 certificates, Sl3000 certificates
Systems Affected: Microsoft PlayReady DRM system
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Data Compromised: Secrets, Api keys, Tokens, Credentials
Systems Affected: GitHub repositoriesCI/CD pipelines
Operational Impact: malicious workflow executionrepository compromiseexfiltration server disruption
Brand Reputation Impact: potential trust erosion in open-source projects
Identity Theft Risk: ['high (due to stolen secrets)']
Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025
Operational Impact: potential compromise of developers using trojanized toolsrisk of downstream supply chain attacks
Brand Reputation Impact: reputational risk to GitHub (if perceived as platform vulnerability)distrust in open-source hacking tools
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Data Compromised: User information (entra id), Group and role details, Tenant settings, Application permissions, Device information, Bitlocker keys, Azure resource access (via global admin impersonation)
Systems Affected: Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD)Azure AD Graph API (graph.windows.net)SharePoint OnlineExchange OnlineAzure-hosted resources (via tenant-level access)
Operational Impact: Potential full tenant compromise, including unauthorized account creation, permission escalation, and data exfiltration across all Entra ID-integrated services.
Brand Reputation Impact: High (due to potential for undetected, large-scale impersonation and data exfiltration)
Identity Theft Risk: High (impersonation of Global Admins and users)
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Financial Loss: $100,000+ (cryptocurrency payments from subscriptions)
Data Compromised: Microsoft 365 usernames, Passwords, Persistent system access
Systems Affected: Microsoft 365 accountstargeted organizations' email systems
Operational Impact: unauthorized access to systemspotential follow-on attacks (ransomware, extortion, fraud)
Brand Reputation Impact: potential reputational damage to Microsoft 365 trustimpact on targeted organizations (e.g., healthcare sector)
Legal Liabilities: lawsuit filed by Microsoft and Health-ISACcriminal referral to international law enforcement
Identity Theft Risk: High (stolen credentials sold for fraud/identity theft)
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Financial Loss: High (Ransomware payments, fraud, incident response costs; exact figures undisclosed)
Data Compromised: User credentials (entra id tokens, passwords), Corporate chat/message history, Onedrive/sharepoint files, Active directory snapshots, Pii (via phishing/exfiltration), Payment information (in some extortion cases)
Systems Affected: Microsoft Teams (Web/Desktop/Mobile Clients)Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD)Microsoft 365 (Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive)On-Premises Active Directory (via hybrid sync)Endpoints (via RMM tools, malware)
Downtime: Varies (Incident-dependent; some organizations experienced prolonged outages during ransomware attacks)
Operational Impact: Disrupted Collaboration (Teams outages, compromised chats)Help Desk Overload (social engineering attacks)Supply Chain Risks (compromised partner tenants)Regulatory Scrutiny (compliance violations)
Revenue Loss: Potentially significant (e.g., ransomware downtime, customer churn, legal penalties)
Customer Complaints: Likely (e.g., phishing victims, data breach notifications)
Brand Reputation Impact: High (eroded trust in Teams security, media coverage of breaches)
Legal Liabilities: GDPR (for EU customer data)CCPA (for California residents)Sector-Specific Regulations (e.g., HIPAA for healthcare)Potential Lawsuits (from affected parties)
Identity Theft Risk: High (stolen credentials sold on dark web)
Payment Information Risk: Moderate (depends on targeted data)
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925
Data Compromised: Api keys, Security tokens, Private source code, Unpublished zero-day vulnerability descriptions
Systems Affected: GitHub Copilot ChatPrivate/Internal Repositories
Operational Impact: High (Potential for stolen credentials/exploits to enable further attacks)
Brand Reputation Impact: Moderate (Trust in AI-assisted coding tools undermined)
Identity Theft Risk: High (If stolen tokens/keys are abused)
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Data Compromised: Potential sensitive data exfiltration (if exploited)
Systems Affected: Windows systems with Remote Access Connection Manager component
Operational Impact: Potential lateral movement across networksUnauthorized execution of malicious code with elevated privileges
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage if exploited in high-profile breaches
Legal Liabilities: Non-compliance with CISA BOD 22-01 for federal agencies if unpatched
Identity Theft Risk: ['Possible if sensitive data is exfiltrated']
Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125
Systems Affected: Windows systems running cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive)Systems with configured sync root directories
Operational Impact: Potential SYSTEM-level privilege escalationArbitrary file creation in restricted directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)DLL side-loading attacks
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage for Microsoft due to critical vulnerability in core cloud sync functionality
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Data Compromised: System information (e.g., whoami, net user /domain, ipconfig /all)
Systems Affected: Windows Server 2012 through 2025 with WSUS role enabled
Operational Impact: Potential for catastrophic downstream effects if WSUS servers are used to distribute malicious updatesReconnaissance and lateral movement risks
Brand Reputation Impact: High (due to potential for large-scale compromise via WSUS)
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Data Compromised: Potentially millions of records (exact number undisclosed), Sensitive organizational and personal data
Systems Affected: Windows machines via malicious Teams installernetworks compromised post-initial access
Operational Impact: disruption of business operations due to ransomware encryptionincident response and recovery efforts
Brand Reputation Impact: damage to trust in Microsoft Teams downloadsreputational harm to affected organizations
Legal Liabilities: potential regulatory fines for data breacheslegal actions from affected parties
Identity Theft Risk: ['high (due to stolen PII)', 'risk of credential stuffing attacks']
Payment Information Risk: ['potential exposure if financial data was exfiltrated']
Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525
Systems Affected: Microsoft Teams (iOS)Microsoft Teams (other platforms, implied)
Operational Impact: Erosion of digital trust in collaboration tools, increased risk of phishing/social engineering success, potential unauthorized actions by tricked users (e.g., clicking malicious links, sharing sensitive data)
Brand Reputation Impact: High (undermines trust in Microsoft Teams as a secure collaboration platform)
Identity Theft Risk: High (if users disclose sensitive information to impersonated attackers)
Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225
Systems Affected: Microsoft SQL Server (versions not specified)
Operational Impact: Potential complete compromise of affected databases (manipulation, exfiltration, or deletion of sensitive data)
Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325
Data Compromised: Github authentication tokens, Potential downstream repository access
Systems Affected: GitHub Actions CI/CD pipelinesdeveloper workstations (via npm install)
Operational Impact: potential cascading supply chain attackscompromised build environments
Brand Reputation Impact: eroded trust in npm/GitHub Actions ecosystemdeveloper caution in package installation
Identity Theft Risk: ['if tokens allowed access to personal repositories']
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Systems Affected: Microsoft Azure Network (Public IP in Australia)Cloudflare DNS Service (1.1.1.1)Legitimate Domains in Cloudflare’s Top Rankings (e.g., Amazon, Microsoft, Google)
Operational Impact: Disruption of Azure Services (Targeted IP)Distortion of Cloudflare’s DNS Query Volume RankingsMitigation Efforts by Cloudflare and Microsoft
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential Erosion of Trust in Cloudflare’s DNS RankingsPerception of Vulnerability in IoT Devices
Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925
Systems Affected: Azure endpoint (Australia)
Downtime: None (service continued without interruption)
Operational Impact: None reported
Brand Reputation Impact: Minimal (successful mitigation highlighted Microsoft’s resilience)
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Financial Loss: Projected increase in breach costs for ungoverned AI systems (per IBM 2025 report); potential economic catastrophe from cascading failures in cloud backbones (Microsoft, Amazon, Google).
Data Compromised: High risk of PII, corporate data, and AI training datasets exposure due to identity sprawl and SaaS attacks.
Systems Affected: SaaS Platforms (e.g., firewalls, cloud services)AI Agents (autonomous systems with broad access)Critical Infrastructure (energy, water, communications)Multi-Cloud EnvironmentsIAM Systems (vulnerable to credential-based attacks)
Downtime: Potential for prolonged outages in critical sectors (e.g., energy grids, water supply) due to nation-state attacks.
Operational Impact: Disruption of essential services, erosion of public trust, and supply chain breakdowns.
Revenue Loss: Significant for organizations failing to meet 2026 cyber-resilience mandates (loss of contracts, insurance, regulatory standing).
Customer Complaints: Expected surge due to service disruptions and data breaches.
Brand Reputation Impact: Severe for companies experiencing high-profile AI or SaaS breaches, especially in concentrated infrastructure sectors.
Legal Liabilities: Fines and legal actions for non-compliance with 2026 mandates (e.g., CISA, CMMC, FISMA).
Identity Theft Risk: High due to synthetic identities and over-permissioned roles.
Payment Information Risk: Elevated in SaaS and cloud environments targeted by supply chain attacks.
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $47.22 thousand.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Source Code, Emails, Documentation, , Private Repository Data, Sensitive Information, , Names, Email Addresses, Email Content, Company Name, Phone Numbers, Files Linked To Business, , Email Addresses, Ip Addresses, Support Case Details, , Source Code, Job listing data, Secrets, Private Keys, Passwords, Internal Microsoft Teams Communications, , Code Signing Certificates, , Source Code, Internal Builds, , Plain Text Passwords, , Email accounts, sensitive information, Personal and potentially sensitive information, User Data, Credit Card Numbers, Social Security Numbers, Other Personal Data, , Personal Data, Credentials, , Credentials, , Source code and secrets, Certificates, Api Keys (Pypi, Npm, Dockerhub, Github, Cloudflare, Aws), Github Tokens, Repository Secrets, , User Identities, Group/Role Memberships, Tenant Configurations, Application Permissions, Device Metadata (Including Bitlocker Keys), Azure Resource Access Credentials, , Microsoft 365 Credentials (Usernames/Passwords), Persistent System Access, , Authentication Tokens (Entra Id), Chat/Message Content, Shared Files (Onedrive/Sharepoint), User Profiles (Presence, Contacts), Ad/Entra Id Metadata (Groups, Roles, Permissions), Pii (In Some Cases), , Source Code, Secrets (Api Keys, Tokens), Unpublished Vulnerability Research, , Potential Sensitive Data (If Exfiltrated Post-Exploitation), , System Configuration Data, Network Information, User/Group Data, , Potentially Pii, Corporate Data, Credentials, Financial Information (If Exfiltrated), , Github Authentication Tokens, Environment Variables, , Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Corporate Intellectual Property, Ai Training Datasets, Cloud Customer Data (Via Saas Breaches), Critical Infrastructure Operational Data and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach MIC04123322
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422
Entity Name: Github
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Software Development
Customers Affected: Dozens of victim organizations
Incident : DDoS Attack GIT105924422
Entity Name: GitHub
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Software Development
Customers Affected: Many Users
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522
Entity Type: Telecommunications Company
Industry: Telecommunications
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522
Entity Type: Banking Conglomerate
Industry: Finance
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522
Entity Type: Big Four Accounting Firm
Industry: Accounting
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522
Entity Type: Israeli Cloud Infrastructure Security Company
Industry: Cloud Security
Location: Israel
Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Size: Large
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Software Company
Industry: Technology
Location: Redmond, Washington, USA
Size: Large
Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Technology
Customers Affected: More than 65,000 entities from 111 countries
Incident : Data Breach MIC234171222
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Technology
Customers Affected: 250000000
Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323
Entity Name: GitHub
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Software Development
Customers Affected: Hundreds of developers
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC20599723
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Entity Name: Microsoft AI Research Division
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Technology
Customers Affected: None
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT205981023
Entity Name: GitHub
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Software Development
Customers Affected: None
Incident : Data Leak MIC2321251123
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Incident : Data Exposure GIT432251223
Entity Name: GitHub
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Software Development Platform
Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: Software
Location: United States
Customers Affected: Over 30,000 organizations
Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: SpainThailandUS
Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724
Entity Name: GitHub
Entity Type: Platform
Industry: Software Development
Customers Affected: GitHub Users
Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524
Industry: Government, Law, Defense, NGOs
Location: North AmericaEurope
Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Size: Large
Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030225
Entity Name: GitHub
Entity Type: Platform
Industry: Software Development
Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Redmond, WA, USA
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Handful of users
Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125
Entity Name: GitHub
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Software Development
Incident : Vulnerability GIT350040225
Entity Name: GitHub
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Software Development
Incident : Vulnerability Disclosure MIC540040825
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Entity Name: Git CLI Users
Entity Type: Software Users
Industry: Software Development
Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425
Entity Name: Netflix
Entity Type: Streaming Service
Industry: Entertainment
Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425
Entity Name: Amazon Prime Video
Entity Type: Streaming Service
Industry: Entertainment
Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425
Entity Name: Disney+
Entity Type: Streaming Service
Industry: Entertainment
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Entity Name: GitHub
Entity Type: code hosting platform
Industry: technology
Location: global
Customers Affected: 327 compromised accounts (817 repositories)
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Entity Name: FastUUID (compromised project)
Entity Type: open-source project
Industry: software development
Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025
Entity Name: GitHub (platform)
Entity Type: code hosting platform
Industry: technology
Location: global
Customers Affected: developers using trojanized repositories, potential downstream victims of compromised tools
Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025
Entity Name: Developers using trojanized repositories
Entity Type: end-users
Industry: various (likely cybersecurity, software development)
Location: global
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology (Cloud Services, Identity Management)
Location: Global
Size: Large (Enterprise)
Customers Affected: All Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) tenants (excluding national cloud deployments)
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Entity Name: Microsoft (targeted credentials)
Entity Type: Technology Corporation
Industry: Software/Cloud Services
Location: Global
Size: Large
Customers Affected: 5,000+ (credentials stolen from 94 countries)
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Entity Name: 2,300+ US organizations (tax-themed phishing campaign)
Entity Type: Businesses, Government Entities, Nonprofits
Industry: Multiple
Location: United States
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Entity Name: 20+ American healthcare organizations
Entity Type: Healthcare Providers
Industry: Healthcare
Location: United States
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Entity Name: Microsoft Teams Users (Global)
Entity Type: Enterprise/Organization
Industry: Cross-Industry (Technology, Finance, Healthcare, Government, etc.)
Location: Worldwide
Size: All sizes (SMB to Fortune 500)
Customers Affected: Millions (exact numbers undisclosed)
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925
Entity Name: GitHub (Microsoft)
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: Software Development/DevOps
Location: San Francisco, California, USA
Size: Large (10,000+ employees)
Customers Affected: Developers/Organizations using Copilot Chat with private repositories
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Entity Name: Federal Civilian Executive Branch Agencies (U.S.)
Entity Type: Government
Industry: Public Sector
Location: United States
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Entity Name: Organizations using Windows systems with Remote Access Connection Manager
Entity Type: Private Sector, Public Sector, Critical Infrastructure
Location: Global
Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation, Software Vendor
Industry: Technology, Software, Cloud Services
Location: Redmond, Washington, USA
Size: Large (Enterprise)
Customers Affected: Users of Windows systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive)
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Entity Name: Multiple Organizations (Indiscriminate Targeting)
Entity Type: Enterprises, Government Agencies, Organizations using WSUS
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Entity Name: Unspecified organizations (27+ since June 2024, ~200 since 2023)
Entity Type: private companies, public sector (possible), non-profits (possible)
Location: global (targeted via Bing ads)
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Entity Name: Microsoft (indirectly, via abuse of Teams branding)
Entity Type: technology corporation
Industry: software/IT
Location: global
Size: large enterprise
Customers Affected: users who clicked malicious ads
Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Size: Large (Enterprise)
Customers Affected: All Microsoft Teams users (especially iOS users for CVE-2024-38197)
Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525
Entity Name: Microsoft Teams Users
Entity Type: Individuals/Organizations
Industry: Multiple (all industries using Teams)
Location: Global
Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225
Entity Name: Microsoft (SQL Server users)
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325
Entity Name: GitHub (Microsoft)
Entity Type: technology company
Industry: software development/platform
Location: San Francisco, California, USA
Size: large enterprise
Customers Affected: developers using GitHub Actions (206,000+ package downloads)
Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325
Entity Name: Developers using '@acitons/artifact'
Entity Type: individuals/organizations
Industry: software development, DevOps, CI/CD
Location: global
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Entity Name: Microsoft
Entity Type: Cloud Service Provider
Industry: Technology
Location: Global (Targeted IP in Australia)
Size: Large Enterprise
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Entity Name: Cloudflare
Entity Type: Cloud/CDN Provider
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Size: Large Enterprise
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Entity Name: End Users of Compromised IoT Devices
Entity Type: Consumers/Residential Users
Industry: Multiple (Home Networks)
Location: United StatesOther Countries (Global)
Customers Affected: 500,000+ IP Addresses (Botnet Size)
Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925
Entity Name: Microsoft Azure
Entity Type: Cloud Service Provider
Industry: Technology/Cloud Computing
Location: Global (targeted endpoint in Australia)
Size: Enterprise
Customers Affected: None (workloads maintained)
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Entity Name: Critical Infrastructure Sectors (U.S.)
Entity Type: Government/Private Partnership
Industry: Energy, Water Supply, Communications, Transportation
Location: United States
Size: National
Customers Affected: Potentially millions (public and private sector)
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Entity Name: Cloud Hyperscalers
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Cloud Computing
Location: Global
Size: Large (e.g., Microsoft, Amazon, Google)
Customers Affected: Billions (indirectly via ecosystem exposure)
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Entity Name: SaaS Providers
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Software as a Service
Location: Global
Size: Varies
Customers Affected: Widespread (1/8 of world's networks at risk via single firewall breach)
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Entity Name: Organizations Using AI Agents
Entity Type: Corporation/Government
Industry: Cross-sector
Location: Global
Size: Varies
Customers Affected: Depends on AI deployment scale
Incident : Data Breach MIC1764707254
Entity Name: OpenAI
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Artificial Intelligence
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422
Containment Measures: Notifying impacted users and organizations
Communication Strategy: Notifying impacted users and organizations
Incident : DDoS Attack GIT105924422
Containment Measures: Removed Several Repositories
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522
Remediation Measures: Patch released in December 2021
Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Remediation Measures: Mitigated the security flaw
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622
Containment Measures: Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol
Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823
Third Party Assistance: Chris Vickery.
Containment Measures: Secured the database
Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Third Party Assistance: Wiz.
Incident : Data Exposure GIT432251223
Containment Measures: Password Reset
Communication Strategy: Public Statement
Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Remediation Measures: Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture
Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Remediation Measures: Patch released
Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724
Containment Measures: Disabled Ghost Accounts
Remediation Measures: Continued Detection and Removal of Harmful Content
Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125
Remediation Measures: Implement stricter file and folder access controls
Incident : Vulnerability GIT350040225
Remediation Measures: Vulnerability addressed by GitHub team
Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Containment Measures: Disable Preview PanesBlock Outbound SMB TrafficEnforce Macro Blocking
Remediation Measures: Deploy Behavioral Monitoring
Enhanced Monitoring: Monitor preview-related processes like explorer.exe, searchindexer.exe, and quicklookd
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Containment Measures: Upgrade to patched Git versionsAvoid using GitHub Desktop for macOS until patched
Remediation Measures: Upgrade to patched Git versionsMonitoring for suspicious git clone –recursive executions
Enhanced Monitoring: Monitoring for suspicious git clone –recursive executions
Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425
Containment Measures: DMCA takedown noticesAccount suspensions
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Gitguardian (Detection/Alerting), Pypi (Mitigation).
Containment Measures: shut down exfiltration serverreverted malicious commitsread-only mode for compromised project
Remediation Measures: alerted affected users via GitHub issuesremoved malicious workflows
Recovery Measures: account recovery for legitimate owners
Communication Strategy: public report by GitGuardiandirect notifications to repository owners
Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025
Third Party Assistance: Reversinglabs (Discovery And Analysis).
Remediation Measures: GitHub may take down malicious repositories (not explicitly stated)
Communication Strategy: ReversingLabs blog post (public disclosure)
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Containment Measures: Patch deployed by Microsoft on July 17, 2025Deprecation and retirement of Azure AD Graph API (effective August 31, 2025)Migration guidance to Microsoft Graph for affected applications
Remediation Measures: No customer action required (server-side patch)Encouragement to migrate from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft GraphReview of applications with extended access to Azure AD Graph API
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Technical blog post by researcher Dirk-jan MollemaAdvisories from cloud security firms (e.g., Mitiga)
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Cloudflare, Health-Isac.
Law Enforcement Notified: Criminal referral to international law enforcement (Ogundipe),
Containment Measures: Seizure of 338 RaccoonO365 websitesCloudflare takedown of domains/Worker accountsInterstitial 'phish warning' pagesTermination of Workers scriptsSuspension of user accounts
Remediation Measures: Lawsuit against Ogundipe and associatesRestraining order (limited to US jurisdiction)
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via Microsoft/Cloudflare blogsCoordination with Health-ISAC
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Incident Response Plan Activated: Recommended (Microsoft Defender XDR playbooks, Entra ID Protection)
Third Party Assistance: Microsoft Detection And Response Team (Dart), Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (Mstic), Managed Security Service Providers (Mssps).
Law Enforcement Notified: Likely (for state-sponsored or large-scale financial crimes)
Containment Measures: Isolate Compromised Accounts/DevicesDisable External Access (Federation, Guest Users)Revoke Suspicious OAuth TokensBlock Malicious IPs/Domains (Defender for Office 365)Quarantine Phishing Emails/Teams Messages
Remediation Measures: Password Resets for Affected UsersMFA Re-EnrollmentPatch Teams Clients/EndpointsRemove Persistent Backdoors (e.g., Sticky Keys, Startup Tasks)Audit Entra ID Configurations (PIM, Conditional Access)
Recovery Measures: Restore Teams Data from Backups (if ransomware)Rebuild Compromised Tenants (in severe cases)User Training (Phishing Simulations, Social Engineering Awareness)Enhanced Logging (Teams Audit Logs, Defender XDR)
Communication Strategy: Internal Advisories (IT teams, executives)Customer Notifications (if data breached)Public Disclosures (for transparency, e.g., Microsoft Security Blog)Regulatory Reporting (as required by law)
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: Recommended (Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps)
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: Available (Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management)
Network Segmentation: Critical (Isolate Teams from high-value assets)
Enhanced Monitoring: Defender XDR Alerts (e.g., anomalous Teams logins)Entra ID Risk Policies (impossible travel, leaked credentials)SIEM Integration (Microsoft Sentinel)Teams-Specific Hunting Queries (e.g., external file shares)
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Legit Security (Researcher Omer Mayraz), Hackerone (Vulnerability Disclosure).
Containment Measures: Disabled image rendering in Copilot Chat (2024-08-14)Blocked Camo image-proxy exfiltration route
Remediation Measures: Long-term fix under development
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Incident Response Plan Activated: ['CISA Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01']
Containment Measures: Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patches cannot be applied
Remediation Measures: Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230Follow BOD 22-01 guidance for securing cloud-based services
Communication Strategy: CISA advisory (KEV catalog inclusion)Public warning via media (e.g., Google News, LinkedIn, X)
Enhanced Monitoring: Recommended for detecting exploitation attempts
Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125
Third Party Assistance: Exodus Intelligence (Vulnerability Discovery).
Containment Measures: October 2025 security updates (patch release)
Remediation Measures: Apply Microsoft security updates (October 2025)Prioritize patching systems with cloud sync root directories
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Incident Response Plan Activated: ['Microsoft (emergency patch)', 'Threat Intelligence Teams (e.g., Google Threat Intelligence Group, Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, Trend Micro ZDI)']
Third Party Assistance: Google Threat Intelligence Group (Gtig), Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative (Zdi).
Containment Measures: Emergency Patch (Microsoft)Network Segmentation (recommended)Disabling Internet-Facing WSUS Instances
Remediation Measures: Apply Microsoft's emergency patchMonitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, data exfiltration)
Communication Strategy: Public advisories by Microsoft and CISAMedia coverage (e.g., The Register)
Network Segmentation: ['Recommended to limit exposure of WSUS servers']
Enhanced Monitoring: Monitor for PowerShell commands (e.g., whoami, net user, ipconfig)Check for exfiltration to Webhook.site endpoints
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Incident Response Plan Activated: ['likely by affected organizations', 'Microsoft revoked 200+ malicious certificates']
Third Party Assistance: Expel (Threat Intelligence Tracking), Microsoft Threat Intelligence Team.
Containment Measures: Microsoft revoked malicious certificatesAV vendors updating detection signatures
Remediation Measures: removal of OysterLoader/Latrodectus malwarepatch management for exploited vulnerabilities
Recovery Measures: restoration from backups (if available)rebuilding compromised systems
Communication Strategy: Expel blog post (2024-10-18)Microsoft social media advisory (2024-10-15)
Network Segmentation: ['recommended for affected organizations']
Enhanced Monitoring: Expel tracking indicators on GitHubrecommended for potential targets
Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes (responsible disclosure by Check Point, patch development by Microsoft)
Third Party Assistance: Check Point (vulnerability research and disclosure)
Containment Measures: Patches released in August 2024 (CVE-2024-38197)Subsequent patches in September 2024 and October 2025
Remediation Measures: Software updates for Microsoft TeamsSecurity advisories for users (e.g., warning about social engineering risks)
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure by Check Point and The Hacker NewsMicrosoft security advisory (released in September 2024)
Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225
Remediation Measures: Patch affected SQL Server instancesReview and enforce principle-of-least-privilege access controlsMonitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure via Microsoft advisoryRecommendations for urgent patching and access control reviews
Enhanced Monitoring: SQL Server logs for suspicious activity
Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Veracode Threat Research.
Containment Measures: npm package removal ('@acitons/artifact')removal of two GitHub user accounts linked to malwareblocking 12 versions of related package '8jfiesaf83'
Remediation Measures: Veracode Package Firewall protection for customersadvisory for GitHub Actions users to scrutinize dependencies
Communication Strategy: public disclosure by Veracodemedia coverage (e.g., GBH)
Enhanced Monitoring: recommended for GitHub Actions environments
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Containment Measures: Mitigation of UDP Flood TrafficTraceback and Enforcement by ISPsRedaction/Hiding of Malicious Domains in Cloudflare Rankings
Remediation Measures: Cloudflare’s Adjustment of DNS Ranking AlgorithmRemoval of Aisuru-Linked Domains from Public Rankings
Communication Strategy: Public Disclosure by Microsoft and CloudflareMedia Coverage by Infosec Journalists (e.g., Brian Krebs)
Enhanced Monitoring: Increased DDoS Mitigation Capabilities (Cloudflare, Microsoft)
Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Containment Measures: Azure DDoS Protection infrastructure filteringTraffic redirection
Remediation Measures: Botnet IP blockingEnhanced monitoring for Aisuru/TurboMirai activity
Communication Strategy: Public blog post by MicrosoftMedia statements
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: True
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Incident Response Plan Activated: Anticipated: National cyber-resilience mandates (U.S. 2026) will require standardized response plans for critical infrastructure.
Third Party Assistance: Expected collaboration between CISA, sector regulators, insurers, and private-sector partners for threat validation.
Law Enforcement Notified: Mandatory for critical infrastructure breaches under 2026 regulations.
Containment Measures: Zero-Trust Architectures (extended to AI agents)Continuous Context-Aware Verification (for identity sprawl)Mandatory MFA Enforcement (cloud providers)Network Segmentation (critical infrastructure)
Remediation Measures: AI-Specific Credential ManagementIAM System ConsolidationSupply Chain Risk AssessmentsResilience Metrics Reporting (for regulatory compliance)
Recovery Measures: Public-Private Threat Intelligence SharingInsurance-Linked Incentives for Cyber HygieneInvestor Penalties for Poor Resilience
Communication Strategy: Transparency mandates for breaches affecting critical infrastructure or AI systems.
Network Segmentation: Critical for containing cascading failures in cloud backbones.
Enhanced Monitoring: Required for AI agents and autonomous systems.
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Recommended (Microsoft Defender XDR playbooks, Entra ID Protection), , CISA Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01, , Microsoft (emergency patch), Threat Intelligence Teams (e.g., Google Threat Intelligence Group, Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, Trend Micro ZDI), , likely by affected organizations, Microsoft revoked 200+ malicious certificates, , Yes (responsible disclosure by Check Point, patch development by Microsoft), , , , Anticipated: National cyber-resilience mandates (U.S. 2026) will require standardized response plans for critical infrastructure..
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Chris Vickery, , Wiz, , GitGuardian (detection/alerting), PyPI (mitigation), , ReversingLabs (discovery and analysis), , Cloudflare, Health-ISAC, , Microsoft Detection and Response Team (DART), Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (MSTIC), Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs), , Legit Security (Researcher Omer Mayraz), HackerOne (Vulnerability Disclosure), , Exodus Intelligence (vulnerability discovery), , Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG), Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative (ZDI), , Expel (threat intelligence tracking), Microsoft Threat Intelligence Team, , Check Point (vulnerability research and disclosure), Veracode Threat Research, , Expected collaboration between CISA, sector regulators, insurers, and private-sector partners for threat validation..
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach MIC04123322
Type of Data Compromised: Source code, Emails, Documentation
Sensitivity of Data: High
File Types Exposed: zip archive
Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422
Type of Data Compromised: Private Repository Data
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122
Type of Data Compromised: Names, Email addresses, Email content, Company name, Phone numbers, Files linked to business
Number of Records Exposed: More than 65,000 entities
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Breach MIC234171222
Type of Data Compromised: Email addresses, Ip addresses, Support case details
Number of Records Exposed: 250000000
Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323
Type of Data Compromised: Source Code
Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823
Type of Data Compromised: Job listing data
Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Type of Data Compromised: Secrets, Private keys, Passwords, Internal microsoft teams communications
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT205981023
Type of Data Compromised: Code signing certificates
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Encryption: True
Incident : Data Leak MIC2321251123
Type of Data Compromised: Source code, Internal builds
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Data Exposure GIT432251223
Type of Data Compromised: Plain text passwords
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Type of Data Compromised: Email accounts, sensitive information
Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Type of Data Compromised: Personal and potentially sensitive information
Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724
Type of Data Compromised: User Data
Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524
Type of Data Compromised: Credit card numbers, Social security numbers, Other personal data
Sensitivity of Data: High
File Types Exposed: Notepad windowPDF
Personally Identifiable Information: credit card numberssocial security numbersother personal data
Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030225
Type of Data Compromised: Personal data, Credentials
Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Data Encryption: Files within a specific test folder
Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125
Type of Data Compromised: Credentials
Incident : Vulnerability GIT350040225
Type of Data Compromised: Source code and secrets
Data Exfiltration: Potential exfiltration
Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
File Types Exposed: LNK FilesPDFsOffice Documents
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Data Exfiltration: Potential exfiltration of intellectual property and proprietary source code
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Type of Data Compromised: Api keys (pypi, npm, dockerhub, github, cloudflare, aws), Github tokens, Repository secrets
Number of Records Exposed: 3325
Sensitivity of Data: high (authentication credentials, cloud access keys)
File Types Exposed: secrets embedded in code/repositoriesenvironment variables
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Type of Data Compromised: User identities, Group/role memberships, Tenant configurations, Application permissions, Device metadata (including bitlocker keys), Azure resource access credentials
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes administrative credentials and encryption keys)
Data Exfiltration: Potential (no evidence of exploitation in the wild)
Personally Identifiable Information: Potential (via user profile data in Entra ID)
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Type of Data Compromised: Microsoft 365 credentials (usernames/passwords), Persistent system access
Number of Records Exposed: 5,000+
Sensitivity of Data: High (credentials enable access to corporate systems, email, and sensitive data)
Personally Identifiable Information: Email addressespotential PII accessed via compromised accounts
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Type of Data Compromised: Authentication tokens (entra id), Chat/message content, Shared files (onedrive/sharepoint), User profiles (presence, contacts), Ad/entra id metadata (groups, roles, permissions), Pii (in some cases)
Number of Records Exposed: Undisclosed (varies by incident; potentially thousands per breach)
Sensitivity of Data: High (corporate communications, credentials, strategic data)
Data Exfiltration: Via Teams API (GraphRunner, TeamFiltration)Cloud Storage Links (OneDrive/SharePoint)C2 Channels (BRc4, ConvoC2)Email/Chat Forwarding
Data Encryption: Partial (some data encrypted in transit, but tokens/credentials exposed)
File Types Exposed: Documents (DOCX, XLSX, PPTX)PDFsImages (PNG, JPG)Executables (EXE, DLL, ISO)Scripts (PS1, VBS)Archives (ZIP, RAR)
Personally Identifiable Information: NamesEmail AddressesJob TitlesPhone NumbersAuthentication Codes (MFA tokens)Corporate Identifiers (Employee IDs)
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925
Type of Data Compromised: Source code, Secrets (api keys, tokens), Unpublished vulnerability research
Sensitivity of Data: High (Includes zero-day exploit details and authentication credentials)
File Types Exposed: Markdown FilesCode FilesPrivate Issues/Pull Requests
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Type of Data Compromised: Potential sensitive data (if exfiltrated post-exploitation)
Sensitivity of Data: High (if administrative access is gained)
Data Exfiltration: Possible if exploited
Personally Identifiable Information: Potential risk if PII is accessible on compromised systems
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Type of Data Compromised: System configuration data, Network information, User/group data
Sensitivity of Data: Medium (internal network reconnaissance data)
Data Exfiltration: Observed via PowerShell payloads to Webhook.site endpoints
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Type of Data Compromised: Potentially pii, Corporate data, Credentials, Financial information (if exfiltrated)
Number of Records Exposed: millions (exact number undisclosed)
Sensitivity of Data: high (includes PII and proprietary data)
Data Exfiltration: confirmed (Rhysida posts non-paying victims' data on leak site)
Data Encryption: ['yes (ransomware encrypts files post-infection)']
Personally Identifiable Information: likely (based on Rhysida's historical targeting)
Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225
Data Exfiltration: Potential (if exploited)
Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325
Type of Data Compromised: Github authentication tokens, Environment variables
Sensitivity of Data: high (build environment credentials)
Data Encryption: ['AES encryption for exfiltrated data']
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Type of Data Compromised: Personally identifiable information (pii), Corporate intellectual property, Ai training datasets, Cloud customer data (via saas breaches), Critical infrastructure operational data
Number of Records Exposed: Potentially billions (scalable via SaaS/AI attacks)
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes AI models, national infrastructure data, and financial records)
Data Exfiltration: Likely in AI agent and SaaS attacks (autonomous systems as exfiltration vectors).
File Types Exposed: Databases (SQL, NoSQL)AI Model Weights/ParametersLog Files (cloud/SaaS)Configuration Files (IAM, firewall rules)Multimedia (deepfake source material)
Personally Identifiable Information: High risk due to identity sprawl and synthetic social engineering.
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Patch released in December 2021, Mitigated the security flaw, , Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture, Patch released, Continued Detection and Removal of Harmful Content, Implement stricter file and folder access controls, , Vulnerability addressed by GitHub team, Deploy Behavioral Monitoring, , Upgrade to patched Git versions, Monitoring for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, , alerted affected users via GitHub issues, removed malicious workflows, , GitHub may take down malicious repositories (not explicitly stated), , No customer action required (server-side patch), Encouragement to migrate from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph, Review of applications with extended access to Azure AD Graph API, , Lawsuit against Ogundipe and associates, Restraining order (limited to US jurisdiction), , Password Resets for Affected Users, MFA Re-Enrollment, Patch Teams Clients/Endpoints, Remove Persistent Backdoors (e.g., Sticky Keys, Startup Tasks), Audit Entra ID Configurations (PIM, Conditional Access), , Long-term fix under development, , Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230, Follow BOD 22-01 guidance for securing cloud-based services, , Apply Microsoft security updates (October 2025), Prioritize patching systems with cloud sync root directories, , Apply Microsoft's emergency patch, Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, data exfiltration), , removal of OysterLoader/Latrodectus malware, patch management for exploited vulnerabilities, , Software updates for Microsoft Teams, Security advisories for users (e.g., warning about social engineering risks), , Patch affected SQL Server instances, Review and enforce principle-of-least-privilege access controls, Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, , Veracode Package Firewall protection for customers, advisory for GitHub Actions users to scrutinize dependencies, , Cloudflare’s Adjustment of DNS Ranking Algorithm, Removal of Aisuru-Linked Domains from Public Rankings, , Botnet IP blocking, Enhanced monitoring for Aisuru/TurboMirai activity, , AI-Specific Credential Management, IAM System Consolidation, Supply Chain Risk Assessments, Resilience Metrics Reporting (for regulatory compliance), .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by notifying impacted users and organizations, removed several repositories, , disabling the msdt url protocol, secured the database, password reset, , disabled ghost accounts, disable preview panes, block outbound smb traffic, enforce macro blocking, , upgrade to patched git versions, avoid using github desktop for macos until patched, , dmca takedown notices, account suspensions, , shut down exfiltration server, reverted malicious commits, read-only mode for compromised project, , patch deployed by microsoft on july 17, 2025, deprecation and retirement of azure ad graph api (effective august 31, 2025), migration guidance to microsoft graph for affected applications, , seizure of 338 raccoono365 websites, cloudflare takedown of domains/worker accounts, interstitial 'phish warning' pages, termination of workers scripts, suspension of user accounts, , isolate compromised accounts/devices, disable external access (federation, guest users), revoke suspicious oauth tokens, block malicious ips/domains (defender for office 365), quarantine phishing emails/teams messages, , disabled image rendering in copilot chat (2024-08-14), blocked camo image-proxy exfiltration route, , isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patches cannot be applied, , october 2025 security updates (patch release), , emergency patch (microsoft), network segmentation (recommended), disabling internet-facing wsus instances, , microsoft revoked malicious certificates, av vendors updating detection signatures, , patches released in august 2024 (cve-2024-38197), subsequent patches in september 2024 and october 2025, , npm package removal ('@acitons/artifact'), removal of two github user accounts linked to malware, blocking 12 versions of related package '8jfiesaf83', , mitigation of udp flood traffic, traceback and enforcement by isps, redaction/hiding of malicious domains in cloudflare rankings, , azure ddos protection infrastructure filtering, traffic redirection, , zero-trust architectures (extended to ai agents), continuous context-aware verification (for identity sprawl), mandatory mfa enforcement (cloud providers), network segmentation (critical infrastructure) and .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Ransom Demanded: ShibaCoin
Data Encryption: Files within a specific test folder
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Ransom Demanded: Varies (e.g., 3AM/Sangria Tempest campaigns; exact amounts undisclosed)
Ransom Paid: Undisclosed (some victims likely paid)
Ransomware Strain: 3AM (BlackSuit rebrand)DarkGateReedBedSangria Tempest (custom loaders)
Data Encryption: Yes (in ransomware cases; e.g., OneDrive/SharePoint files)
Data Exfiltration: Yes (double extortion tactics)
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Data Exfiltration: ['Reconnaissance data (no ransomware observed yet)']
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Ransomware Strain: RhysidaOysterLoader (loader)Latrodectus (initial access)
Data Encryption: ['yes (post-infection)']
Data Exfiltration: ['yes (double extortion model)']
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through account recovery for legitimate owners, , Restore Teams Data from Backups (if ransomware), Rebuild Compromised Tenants (in severe cases), User Training (Phishing Simulations, Social Engineering Awareness), Enhanced Logging (Teams Audit Logs, Defender XDR), , restoration from backups (if available), rebuilding compromised systems, , Public-Private Threat Intelligence Sharing, Insurance-Linked Incentives for Cyber Hygiene, Investor Penalties for Poor Resilience, .
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Legal Actions: Lawsuit by Microsoft/Health-ISAC, Restraining order (US jurisdiction only),
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Regulations Violated: GDPR (Article 32 - Security of Processing), CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act), HIPAA (if healthcare data exposed), GLBA (for financial institutions), Sector-Specific Frameworks (e.g., NIST, ISO 27001),
Fines Imposed: Potential (none publicly disclosed yet)
Legal Actions: Possible (e.g., class-action lawsuits for data breaches)
Regulatory Notifications: Data Protection Authorities (e.g., ICO for UK)State Attorneys General (for US breaches)Industry Regulators (e.g., SEC for public companies)
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Regulations Violated: Potential violation of CISA BOD 22-01 if federal agencies fail to patch by November 4, 2025,
Regulatory Notifications: CISA KEV catalog inclusion (October 14, 2025)
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Regulatory Notifications: CISA added to Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Regulatory Notifications: likely required for affected organizations (e.g., GDPR, state breach laws)
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Regulations Violated: Anticipated violations of 2026 U.S. cyber-resilience mandates (blend of CMMC, CIRCIA, FISMA).
Fines Imposed: Projected for non-compliance (details TBD by CISA/sector regulators).
Legal Actions: Potential lawsuits from stakeholders affected by mandate failures.
Regulatory Notifications: Mandatory disclosure of breaches under 2026 rules, with private-sector data validating performance.
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Lawsuit by Microsoft/Health-ISAC, Restraining order (US jurisdiction only), , Possible (e.g., class-action lawsuits for data breaches), Potential lawsuits from stakeholders affected by mandate failures..
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Lessons Learned: Difficulty in tracking SAS tokens due to lack of centralized management in Azure interface.
Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Lessons Learned: Importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilance
Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Lessons Learned: Criticality of awareness and proactive security measures
Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Lessons Learned: Importance of stringent security measures in review processes.
Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Lessons Learned: Modern computing environments’ emphasis on user convenience creates silent execution paths that require no interaction, fundamentally challenging traditional security assumptions about file-based attacks and necessitating a reevaluation of how systems handle passive file processing.
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Lessons Learned: Ensure timely updates to software, monitor for suspicious git operations, and audit repository contents before cloning.
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Lessons Learned: Open-source maintainer accounts are high-value targets for supply-chain attacks., Malicious CI/CD workflows can bypass traditional security controls., Proactive monitoring of public repositories can disrupt attacks early., Automated secret detection tools (e.g., GitGuardian) are critical for mitigating credential leaks.
Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025
Lessons Learned: Open-source repositories can be weaponized for supply chain attacks even in cybersecurity tooling., Developers must verify the integrity of third-party tools, especially those from untrusted sources., Threat actors exploit the trust in popular platforms (e.g., GitHub) to distribute malware.
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Lessons Learned: Legacy APIs (e.g., Azure AD Graph) can introduce critical vulnerabilities if not properly deprecated or secured., Cross-tenant access risks in cloud identity systems require robust tenant isolation and token validation., Lack of API-level logging can enable stealthy exploitation without detection., Conditional Access and MFA can be bypassed if underlying identity validation mechanisms are flawed., Proactive migration from deprecated services is essential to mitigate emerging risks.
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Lessons Learned: Phishing-as-a-service operations can scale rapidly with low barriers to entry (subscriptions as low as $335)., MFA bypass techniques remain a critical vulnerability in credential-based attacks., Operational security lapses (e.g., exposed cryptocurrency wallets) can aid attribution., Collaboration between tech companies (Microsoft/Cloudflare) and sector-specific ISACs (Health-ISAC) enhances disruption efforts., AI-powered phishing tools (e.g., RaccoonO365 AI-MailCheck) increase attack sophistication and scalability.
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Lessons Learned: Teams is a High-Value Target: Its integration with Entra ID, Graph API, and collaboration features makes it a lucrative attack vector for both commodity and advanced threat actors., Social Engineering Remains Effective: Deepfakes, impersonation (IT help desk, external partners), and urgency-based scams (e.g., email bombing) bypass technical controls., Default Configurations Are Risky: Over-permissive external access, unmonitored API queries, and legacy authentication enable initial access and lateral movement., Open-Source Tools Lower the Barrier: Frameworks like TeamFiltration, AADInternals, and ROADtools democratize Teams exploitation for less-skilled attackers., Hybrid Environments Complicate Security: On-premises AD synced with Entra ID creates seams for attackers to exploit (e.g., Peach Sandstorm’s AD snapshots)., MFA Is Not a Silver Bullet: Actors like Octo Tempest bypass MFA via social engineering (e.g., password resets, SIM swapping) or token theft., Third-Party Apps Introduce Risk: Spoofed or malicious Teams apps (even Microsoft-validated ones) can serve as initial access vectors., Detection Gaps Exist: Many Teams-specific attacks (e.g., phishing via Adaptive Cards, C2 over Teams messages) evade traditional email/security tools., Incident Response Must Be Teams-Aware: Logs from Teams, Graph API, and Entra ID are critical for forensics but often underutilized., User Awareness Is Critical: Employees must scrutinize Teams messages/calls as rigorously as emails, especially from 'internal' sources.
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925
Lessons Learned: AI-assisted tools like Copilot Chat expand the attack surface by introducing new input channels (e.g., hidden markdown) that bypass human review. Content Security Policies (CSP) and proxy services (e.g., Camo) can be weaponized for covert exfiltration if not properly restricted. Developer workflows integrating AI require stricter input validation and output monitoring to prevent prompt injection and data leakage.
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Lessons Learned: Privilege escalation vulnerabilities are critical as they enable deeper system access when chained with initial access exploits., Rapid patching is essential to mitigate active exploitation, especially for vulnerabilities added to CISA’s KEV catalog., Federal agencies must adhere to BOD 22-01 timelines to avoid compliance risks.
Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125
Lessons Learned: Race conditions in validation logic can reintroduce vulnerabilities even after prior patches (e.g., CVE-2020-17136)., Cloud synchronization services introduce attack surfaces that require rigorous input validation, especially for file operations., Time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerabilities can be exploited with multi-threaded techniques to bypass security controls., Privilege escalation via DLL side-loading remains a persistent risk when attackers can write to system directories.
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Lessons Learned: Incomplete patches can increase risk by creating a false sense of security., Internet-facing WSUS servers should be strictly controlled or disabled., Proof-of-concept (PoC) availability accelerates exploitation by opportunistic actors., Monitoring for reconnaissance commands (e.g., PowerShell) is critical for early detection.
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Lessons Learned: Malvertising remains an effective initial access vector, especially when abusing trusted brands like Microsoft Teams., Code-signing certificate abuse can bypass security controls, requiring proactive revocation by CAs., Obfuscation techniques (e.g., packing tools) can delay AV detection, emphasizing the need for behavioral-based defenses., RaaS models like Rhysida enable rapid scaling of attacks with varied malware (OysterLoader, Latrodectus)., Typosquatting and fake download pages exploit user trust in search engines and legitimate software.
Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525
Lessons Learned: Collaboration platforms like Teams are as critical as email and equally exposed to social engineering risks., Threat actors can exploit trust mechanisms without needing to 'break in'—they only need to 'bend trust'., Organizations must secure not just systems but also what people believe (e.g., verification over visual trust)., Vulnerabilities in widely used tools like Teams can have cascading impacts across global enterprises.
Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225
Lessons Learned: Importance of maintaining robust database security practices, Necessity of regular patching schedules for critical systems, Value of access control reviews and continuous monitoring of database activity, Urgency in addressing network-accessible vulnerabilities with high impact potential
Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325
Lessons Learned: Typosquatting remains effective for supply chain attacks despite awareness., Obfuscation techniques (shc, encrypted C2) can evade AV detection (0/XX on VirusTotal)., GitHub Actions environment variables are high-value targets for token theft., Short-lived malware (self-termination dates) complicates detection., CI/CD pipelines require stricter dependency verification (e.g., package signing, allowlists).
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Lessons Learned: IoT devices remain a critical attack vector for large-scale DDoS botnets., Firmware update servers (e.g., TotoLink) are high-value targets for botnet expansion., DNS query volume rankings can be manipulated by malicious traffic, requiring proactive redaction., Collaboration between cloud providers (Microsoft, Cloudflare) is essential for mitigating record-breaking attacks.
Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925
Lessons Learned: DDoS attacks are scaling with internet infrastructure upgrades (e.g., fiber-to-home, IoT proliferation)., Botnets like Aisuru/TurboMirai pose persistent threats by exploiting unsecured IoT devices., Cloud-native DDoS protection (e.g., Azure’s scrubbing services) is critical for mitigating large-scale attacks., Residential ISPs are increasingly targeted as attack launchpads.
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Lessons Learned: Concentrated infrastructure risk (e.g., Microsoft/Amazon/Google backbones) is the biggest vulnerability, not just technology., AI agents introduce unique risks due to autonomy and broad access, requiring non-human zero-trust models., Identity sprawl and static authentication are no longer viable; continuous verification is essential., Compliance can drive innovation if treated as a framework for stakeholder trust and responsible AI/data use., The cybersecurity talent pipeline is critically thin, exacerbated by AI eliminating entry-level roles., Optional MFA and shared responsibility models in cloud security are no longer sufficient.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Recommendations: Timely updates and patches to software
Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125
Recommendations: Implement stricter file and folder access controls
Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Recommendations: Disable preview panes in Windows Explorer and Quick Look on macOS, Block outbound SMB traffic (TCP 445) to untrusted networks, Enforce macro blocking through Group Policy, Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual network activity from preview-related processesDisable preview panes in Windows Explorer and Quick Look on macOS, Block outbound SMB traffic (TCP 445) to untrusted networks, Enforce macro blocking through Group Policy, Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual network activity from preview-related processesDisable preview panes in Windows Explorer and Quick Look on macOS, Block outbound SMB traffic (TCP 445) to untrusted networks, Enforce macro blocking through Group Policy, Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual network activity from preview-related processesDisable preview panes in Windows Explorer and Quick Look on macOS, Block outbound SMB traffic (TCP 445) to untrusted networks, Enforce macro blocking through Group Policy, Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual network activity from preview-related processes
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Recommendations: Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, audit .gitmodules file contents before cloning untrusted repositories.
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Recommendations: Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for maintainer accounts., Scan repositories for exposed secrets using tools like GitGuardian or TruffleHog., Restrict workflow permissions in GitHub Actions to least privilege., Monitor for unusual CI/CD pipeline modifications., Educate developers on secure secret management (e.g., use of vaults).Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for maintainer accounts., Scan repositories for exposed secrets using tools like GitGuardian or TruffleHog., Restrict workflow permissions in GitHub Actions to least privilege., Monitor for unusual CI/CD pipeline modifications., Educate developers on secure secret management (e.g., use of vaults).Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for maintainer accounts., Scan repositories for exposed secrets using tools like GitGuardian or TruffleHog., Restrict workflow permissions in GitHub Actions to least privilege., Monitor for unusual CI/CD pipeline modifications., Educate developers on secure secret management (e.g., use of vaults).Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for maintainer accounts., Scan repositories for exposed secrets using tools like GitGuardian or TruffleHog., Restrict workflow permissions in GitHub Actions to least privilege., Monitor for unusual CI/CD pipeline modifications., Educate developers on secure secret management (e.g., use of vaults).Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for maintainer accounts., Scan repositories for exposed secrets using tools like GitGuardian or TruffleHog., Restrict workflow permissions in GitHub Actions to least privilege., Monitor for unusual CI/CD pipeline modifications., Educate developers on secure secret management (e.g., use of vaults).
Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025
Recommendations: GitHub should enhance repository vetting for suspicious patterns (e.g., trojanized forks of legitimate tools)., Developers should use code-signing, checksum verification, or trusted sources for tools., Organizations should monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) linked to Banana Squad’s repositories., Implement runtime analysis for Python scripts to detect hidden backdoor logic.GitHub should enhance repository vetting for suspicious patterns (e.g., trojanized forks of legitimate tools)., Developers should use code-signing, checksum verification, or trusted sources for tools., Organizations should monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) linked to Banana Squad’s repositories., Implement runtime analysis for Python scripts to detect hidden backdoor logic.GitHub should enhance repository vetting for suspicious patterns (e.g., trojanized forks of legitimate tools)., Developers should use code-signing, checksum verification, or trusted sources for tools., Organizations should monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) linked to Banana Squad’s repositories., Implement runtime analysis for Python scripts to detect hidden backdoor logic.GitHub should enhance repository vetting for suspicious patterns (e.g., trojanized forks of legitimate tools)., Developers should use code-signing, checksum verification, or trusted sources for tools., Organizations should monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) linked to Banana Squad’s repositories., Implement runtime analysis for Python scripts to detect hidden backdoor logic.
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Recommendations: Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios.
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Recommendations: Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations.Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations.Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations.Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations.Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations.Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations.
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Recommendations: Identity: ['Enforce Phishing-Resistant MFA (e.g., FIDO2, certificate-based) for all users, especially admins.', 'Deploy Entra ID Protection with high-risk sign-in policies (e.g., block legacy auth, impossible travel).', 'Use Privileged Identity Management (PIM) for just-in-time Teams admin roles.', 'Disable external access by default; whitelist trusted domains for federation.', 'Monitor for anomalous token usage (e.g., device code phishing) with Defender for Identity.'], Endpoints: ['Apply Microsoft’s hardened Teams client configurations (e.g., disable macros, block unsafe file types).', 'Deploy Defender for Endpoint with Teams-specific detections (e.g., suspicious module loads).', 'Restrict RMM tools (e.g., AnyDesk) to approved IT personnel via application control.', 'Enable attack surface reduction (ASR) rules for Office/Teams processes.'], Teams Configuration: ['Disable anonymous/guest access unless absolutely required; audit existing guests.', 'Limit external sharing in SharePoint/OneDrive linked to Teams.', 'Configure Teams to log all admin activities and API calls (retention ≥ 1 year).', 'Disable presence sharing for external users to prevent reconnaissance.', 'Block auto-forwarding of Teams messages to external emails.'], Network: ['Segment Teams traffic from high-value assets (e.g., finance, R&D).', 'Monitor for C2 over Teams (e.g., Adaptive Card exfiltration, BRc4 traffic).', 'Block known malicious IPs/domains associated with Teams phishing (e.g., fake installers).', 'Inspect TLS traffic for Teams (via Defender for Cloud Apps or proxy).'], Detection Response: ["Enable all Teams-related Defender XDR alerts (e.g., 'Malicious link shared in Teams chat').", 'Create custom hunting queries for Teams threat activity (e.g., external file shares, message deletions).', 'Use Microsoft Security Copilot to correlate Teams signals with broader attack chains.', 'Simulate Teams-specific attacks (e.g., phishing via Adaptive Cards) in red team exercises.', 'Integrate Teams logs with SIEM (e.g., Sentinel) for centralized analysis.'], User Awareness: ['Train users to verify Teams calls/messages via a secondary channel (e.g., phone call to known number).', "Highlight red flags: urgent requests, unsolicited file shares, or 'IT support' asking for credentials.", 'Simulate Teams-based phishing (e.g., fake help desk chats) in security awareness programs.', 'Educate on deepfake risks (e.g., AI-generated voices in Teams calls).'], Governance: ['Audit Teams app permissions regularly; remove unused or over-privileged apps.', 'Document and test incident response playbooks for Teams-specific scenarios (e.g., token theft, ransomware).', 'Assign ownership for Teams security to a dedicated team (e.g., collaboration security lead).', 'Include Teams in third-party risk assessments (e.g., partner tenant security posture).'].
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925
Recommendations: Audit AI tool permissions to limit access to sensitive data., Sanitize all inputs (including 'invisible' content like markdown comments) before processing by AI assistants., Disable unnecessary features (e.g., image rendering) in AI tools handling sensitive data., Implement behavioral detection for anomalous AI-assisted actions (e.g., unusual file access patterns)., Educate developers on risks of AI prompt injection and social engineering via hidden content.Audit AI tool permissions to limit access to sensitive data., Sanitize all inputs (including 'invisible' content like markdown comments) before processing by AI assistants., Disable unnecessary features (e.g., image rendering) in AI tools handling sensitive data., Implement behavioral detection for anomalous AI-assisted actions (e.g., unusual file access patterns)., Educate developers on risks of AI prompt injection and social engineering via hidden content.Audit AI tool permissions to limit access to sensitive data., Sanitize all inputs (including 'invisible' content like markdown comments) before processing by AI assistants., Disable unnecessary features (e.g., image rendering) in AI tools handling sensitive data., Implement behavioral detection for anomalous AI-assisted actions (e.g., unusual file access patterns)., Educate developers on risks of AI prompt injection and social engineering via hidden content.Audit AI tool permissions to limit access to sensitive data., Sanitize all inputs (including 'invisible' content like markdown comments) before processing by AI assistants., Disable unnecessary features (e.g., image rendering) in AI tools handling sensitive data., Implement behavioral detection for anomalous AI-assisted actions (e.g., unusual file access patterns)., Educate developers on risks of AI prompt injection and social engineering via hidden content.Audit AI tool permissions to limit access to sensitive data., Sanitize all inputs (including 'invisible' content like markdown comments) before processing by AI assistants., Disable unnecessary features (e.g., image rendering) in AI tools handling sensitive data., Implement behavioral detection for anomalous AI-assisted actions (e.g., unusual file access patterns)., Educate developers on risks of AI prompt injection and social engineering via hidden content.
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Recommendations: Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230 immediately., Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patching is not feasible., Monitor networks for signs of privilege escalation or lateral movement., Prioritize patching for internet-facing systems and those accessible via phishing vectors., Follow CISA’s BOD 22-01 guidance for comprehensive vulnerability management.Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230 immediately., Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patching is not feasible., Monitor networks for signs of privilege escalation or lateral movement., Prioritize patching for internet-facing systems and those accessible via phishing vectors., Follow CISA’s BOD 22-01 guidance for comprehensive vulnerability management.Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230 immediately., Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patching is not feasible., Monitor networks for signs of privilege escalation or lateral movement., Prioritize patching for internet-facing systems and those accessible via phishing vectors., Follow CISA’s BOD 22-01 guidance for comprehensive vulnerability management.Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230 immediately., Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patching is not feasible., Monitor networks for signs of privilege escalation or lateral movement., Prioritize patching for internet-facing systems and those accessible via phishing vectors., Follow CISA’s BOD 22-01 guidance for comprehensive vulnerability management.Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230 immediately., Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patching is not feasible., Monitor networks for signs of privilege escalation or lateral movement., Prioritize patching for internet-facing systems and those accessible via phishing vectors., Follow CISA’s BOD 22-01 guidance for comprehensive vulnerability management.
Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125
Recommendations: Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations.Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations.Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations.Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations.Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations.Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations.
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Recommendations: Apply Microsoft's emergency patch immediately., Audit and restrict WSUS server exposure to the internet., Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, exfiltration to Webhook.site)., Segment networks to limit lateral movement from compromised WSUS servers., Hold vendors accountable for incomplete patches that fail to fully address vulnerabilities.Apply Microsoft's emergency patch immediately., Audit and restrict WSUS server exposure to the internet., Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, exfiltration to Webhook.site)., Segment networks to limit lateral movement from compromised WSUS servers., Hold vendors accountable for incomplete patches that fail to fully address vulnerabilities.Apply Microsoft's emergency patch immediately., Audit and restrict WSUS server exposure to the internet., Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, exfiltration to Webhook.site)., Segment networks to limit lateral movement from compromised WSUS servers., Hold vendors accountable for incomplete patches that fail to fully address vulnerabilities.Apply Microsoft's emergency patch immediately., Audit and restrict WSUS server exposure to the internet., Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, exfiltration to Webhook.site)., Segment networks to limit lateral movement from compromised WSUS servers., Hold vendors accountable for incomplete patches that fail to fully address vulnerabilities.Apply Microsoft's emergency patch immediately., Audit and restrict WSUS server exposure to the internet., Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands, exfiltration to Webhook.site)., Segment networks to limit lateral movement from compromised WSUS servers., Hold vendors accountable for incomplete patches that fail to fully address vulnerabilities.
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Recommendations: Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation.
Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525
Recommendations: Apply Microsoft Teams patches promptly, especially for CVE-2024-38197., Educate users on verifying sender identities and message authenticity (e.g., out-of-band confirmation for sensitive requests)., Implement additional authentication for high-stakes actions (e.g., multi-factor approval for data sharing)., Monitor for unusual message edits or notification behaviors in Teams., Assume collaboration tools are high-value targets and layer defenses (e.g., behavioral analysis, anomaly detection).Apply Microsoft Teams patches promptly, especially for CVE-2024-38197., Educate users on verifying sender identities and message authenticity (e.g., out-of-band confirmation for sensitive requests)., Implement additional authentication for high-stakes actions (e.g., multi-factor approval for data sharing)., Monitor for unusual message edits or notification behaviors in Teams., Assume collaboration tools are high-value targets and layer defenses (e.g., behavioral analysis, anomaly detection).Apply Microsoft Teams patches promptly, especially for CVE-2024-38197., Educate users on verifying sender identities and message authenticity (e.g., out-of-band confirmation for sensitive requests)., Implement additional authentication for high-stakes actions (e.g., multi-factor approval for data sharing)., Monitor for unusual message edits or notification behaviors in Teams., Assume collaboration tools are high-value targets and layer defenses (e.g., behavioral analysis, anomaly detection).Apply Microsoft Teams patches promptly, especially for CVE-2024-38197., Educate users on verifying sender identities and message authenticity (e.g., out-of-band confirmation for sensitive requests)., Implement additional authentication for high-stakes actions (e.g., multi-factor approval for data sharing)., Monitor for unusual message edits or notification behaviors in Teams., Assume collaboration tools are high-value targets and layer defenses (e.g., behavioral analysis, anomaly detection).Apply Microsoft Teams patches promptly, especially for CVE-2024-38197., Educate users on verifying sender identities and message authenticity (e.g., out-of-band confirmation for sensitive requests)., Implement additional authentication for high-stakes actions (e.g., multi-factor approval for data sharing)., Monitor for unusual message edits or notification behaviors in Teams., Assume collaboration tools are high-value targets and layer defenses (e.g., behavioral analysis, anomaly detection).
Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225
Recommendations: Prioritize patching affected SQL Server instances during scheduled maintenance windows, Review and implement principle-of-least-privilege policies for database access, Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, Coordinate between security teams and database administrators for timely updates, Treat this vulnerability with urgency in systems handling sensitive or critical dataPrioritize patching affected SQL Server instances during scheduled maintenance windows, Review and implement principle-of-least-privilege policies for database access, Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, Coordinate between security teams and database administrators for timely updates, Treat this vulnerability with urgency in systems handling sensitive or critical dataPrioritize patching affected SQL Server instances during scheduled maintenance windows, Review and implement principle-of-least-privilege policies for database access, Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, Coordinate between security teams and database administrators for timely updates, Treat this vulnerability with urgency in systems handling sensitive or critical dataPrioritize patching affected SQL Server instances during scheduled maintenance windows, Review and implement principle-of-least-privilege policies for database access, Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, Coordinate between security teams and database administrators for timely updates, Treat this vulnerability with urgency in systems handling sensitive or critical dataPrioritize patching affected SQL Server instances during scheduled maintenance windows, Review and implement principle-of-least-privilege policies for database access, Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, Coordinate between security teams and database administrators for timely updates, Treat this vulnerability with urgency in systems handling sensitive or critical data
Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325
Recommendations: Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation.
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Recommendations: Strengthen IoT device security (e.g., router/camera firmware updates, default credential changes)., Monitor and secure firmware update servers to prevent supply-chain-style compromises., Implement rate-limiting and anomaly detection for UDP traffic to mitigate volumetric DDoS attacks., Enhance transparency in public rankings (e.g., Cloudflare’s Top Domains) to account for malicious traffic distortion., Expand ISP-level enforcement to disrupt botnet command-and-control (C2) infrastructure.Strengthen IoT device security (e.g., router/camera firmware updates, default credential changes)., Monitor and secure firmware update servers to prevent supply-chain-style compromises., Implement rate-limiting and anomaly detection for UDP traffic to mitigate volumetric DDoS attacks., Enhance transparency in public rankings (e.g., Cloudflare’s Top Domains) to account for malicious traffic distortion., Expand ISP-level enforcement to disrupt botnet command-and-control (C2) infrastructure.Strengthen IoT device security (e.g., router/camera firmware updates, default credential changes)., Monitor and secure firmware update servers to prevent supply-chain-style compromises., Implement rate-limiting and anomaly detection for UDP traffic to mitigate volumetric DDoS attacks., Enhance transparency in public rankings (e.g., Cloudflare’s Top Domains) to account for malicious traffic distortion., Expand ISP-level enforcement to disrupt botnet command-and-control (C2) infrastructure.Strengthen IoT device security (e.g., router/camera firmware updates, default credential changes)., Monitor and secure firmware update servers to prevent supply-chain-style compromises., Implement rate-limiting and anomaly detection for UDP traffic to mitigate volumetric DDoS attacks., Enhance transparency in public rankings (e.g., Cloudflare’s Top Domains) to account for malicious traffic distortion., Expand ISP-level enforcement to disrupt botnet command-and-control (C2) infrastructure.Strengthen IoT device security (e.g., router/camera firmware updates, default credential changes)., Monitor and secure firmware update servers to prevent supply-chain-style compromises., Implement rate-limiting and anomaly detection for UDP traffic to mitigate volumetric DDoS attacks., Enhance transparency in public rankings (e.g., Cloudflare’s Top Domains) to account for malicious traffic distortion., Expand ISP-level enforcement to disrupt botnet command-and-control (C2) infrastructure.
Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925
Recommendations: Implement multi-layered DDoS protection (e.g., cloud scrubbing, rate limiting)., Secure IoT devices with strong credentials, firmware updates, and network segmentation., Monitor for botnet activity (e.g., Aisuru/TurboMirai) in residential ISP traffic., Prepare for attacks exceeding 20 Tbps as baseline capacities grow.Implement multi-layered DDoS protection (e.g., cloud scrubbing, rate limiting)., Secure IoT devices with strong credentials, firmware updates, and network segmentation., Monitor for botnet activity (e.g., Aisuru/TurboMirai) in residential ISP traffic., Prepare for attacks exceeding 20 Tbps as baseline capacities grow.Implement multi-layered DDoS protection (e.g., cloud scrubbing, rate limiting)., Secure IoT devices with strong credentials, firmware updates, and network segmentation., Monitor for botnet activity (e.g., Aisuru/TurboMirai) in residential ISP traffic., Prepare for attacks exceeding 20 Tbps as baseline capacities grow.Implement multi-layered DDoS protection (e.g., cloud scrubbing, rate limiting)., Secure IoT devices with strong credentials, firmware updates, and network segmentation., Monitor for botnet activity (e.g., Aisuru/TurboMirai) in residential ISP traffic., Prepare for attacks exceeding 20 Tbps as baseline capacities grow.
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Recommendations: Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Difficulty in tracking SAS tokens due to lack of centralized management in Azure interface.Importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilanceCriticality of awareness and proactive security measuresImportance of stringent security measures in review processes.Modern computing environments’ emphasis on user convenience creates silent execution paths that require no interaction, fundamentally challenging traditional security assumptions about file-based attacks and necessitating a reevaluation of how systems handle passive file processing.Ensure timely updates to software, monitor for suspicious git operations, and audit repository contents before cloning.Open-source maintainer accounts are high-value targets for supply-chain attacks.,Malicious CI/CD workflows can bypass traditional security controls.,Proactive monitoring of public repositories can disrupt attacks early.,Automated secret detection tools (e.g., GitGuardian) are critical for mitigating credential leaks.Open-source repositories can be weaponized for supply chain attacks even in cybersecurity tooling.,Developers must verify the integrity of third-party tools, especially those from untrusted sources.,Threat actors exploit the trust in popular platforms (e.g., GitHub) to distribute malware.Legacy APIs (e.g., Azure AD Graph) can introduce critical vulnerabilities if not properly deprecated or secured.,Cross-tenant access risks in cloud identity systems require robust tenant isolation and token validation.,Lack of API-level logging can enable stealthy exploitation without detection.,Conditional Access and MFA can be bypassed if underlying identity validation mechanisms are flawed.,Proactive migration from deprecated services is essential to mitigate emerging risks.Phishing-as-a-service operations can scale rapidly with low barriers to entry (subscriptions as low as $335).,MFA bypass techniques remain a critical vulnerability in credential-based attacks.,Operational security lapses (e.g., exposed cryptocurrency wallets) can aid attribution.,Collaboration between tech companies (Microsoft/Cloudflare) and sector-specific ISACs (Health-ISAC) enhances disruption efforts.,AI-powered phishing tools (e.g., RaccoonO365 AI-MailCheck) increase attack sophistication and scalability.Teams is a High-Value Target: Its integration with Entra ID, Graph API, and collaboration features makes it a lucrative attack vector for both commodity and advanced threat actors.,Social Engineering Remains Effective: Deepfakes, impersonation (IT help desk, external partners), and urgency-based scams (e.g., email bombing) bypass technical controls.,Default Configurations Are Risky: Over-permissive external access, unmonitored API queries, and legacy authentication enable initial access and lateral movement.,Open-Source Tools Lower the Barrier: Frameworks like TeamFiltration, AADInternals, and ROADtools democratize Teams exploitation for less-skilled attackers.,Hybrid Environments Complicate Security: On-premises AD synced with Entra ID creates seams for attackers to exploit (e.g., Peach Sandstorm’s AD snapshots).,MFA Is Not a Silver Bullet: Actors like Octo Tempest bypass MFA via social engineering (e.g., password resets, SIM swapping) or token theft.,Third-Party Apps Introduce Risk: Spoofed or malicious Teams apps (even Microsoft-validated ones) can serve as initial access vectors.,Detection Gaps Exist: Many Teams-specific attacks (e.g., phishing via Adaptive Cards, C2 over Teams messages) evade traditional email/security tools.,Incident Response Must Be Teams-Aware: Logs from Teams, Graph API, and Entra ID are critical for forensics but often underutilized.,User Awareness Is Critical: Employees must scrutinize Teams messages/calls as rigorously as emails, especially from 'internal' sources.AI-assisted tools like Copilot Chat expand the attack surface by introducing new input channels (e.g., hidden markdown) that bypass human review. Content Security Policies (CSP) and proxy services (e.g., Camo) can be weaponized for covert exfiltration if not properly restricted. Developer workflows integrating AI require stricter input validation and output monitoring to prevent prompt injection and data leakage.Privilege escalation vulnerabilities are critical as they enable deeper system access when chained with initial access exploits.,Rapid patching is essential to mitigate active exploitation, especially for vulnerabilities added to CISA’s KEV catalog.,Federal agencies must adhere to BOD 22-01 timelines to avoid compliance risks.Race conditions in validation logic can reintroduce vulnerabilities even after prior patches (e.g., CVE-2020-17136).,Cloud synchronization services introduce attack surfaces that require rigorous input validation, especially for file operations.,Time-of-check time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerabilities can be exploited with multi-threaded techniques to bypass security controls.,Privilege escalation via DLL side-loading remains a persistent risk when attackers can write to system directories.Incomplete patches can increase risk by creating a false sense of security.,Internet-facing WSUS servers should be strictly controlled or disabled.,Proof-of-concept (PoC) availability accelerates exploitation by opportunistic actors.,Monitoring for reconnaissance commands (e.g., PowerShell) is critical for early detection.Malvertising remains an effective initial access vector, especially when abusing trusted brands like Microsoft Teams.,Code-signing certificate abuse can bypass security controls, requiring proactive revocation by CAs.,Obfuscation techniques (e.g., packing tools) can delay AV detection, emphasizing the need for behavioral-based defenses.,RaaS models like Rhysida enable rapid scaling of attacks with varied malware (OysterLoader, Latrodectus).,Typosquatting and fake download pages exploit user trust in search engines and legitimate software.Collaboration platforms like Teams are as critical as email and equally exposed to social engineering risks.,Threat actors can exploit trust mechanisms without needing to 'break in'—they only need to 'bend trust'.,Organizations must secure not just systems but also what people believe (e.g., verification over visual trust).,Vulnerabilities in widely used tools like Teams can have cascading impacts across global enterprises.Importance of maintaining robust database security practices,Necessity of regular patching schedules for critical systems,Value of access control reviews and continuous monitoring of database activity,Urgency in addressing network-accessible vulnerabilities with high impact potentialTyposquatting remains effective for supply chain attacks despite awareness.,Obfuscation techniques (shc, encrypted C2) can evade AV detection (0/XX on VirusTotal).,GitHub Actions environment variables are high-value targets for token theft.,Short-lived malware (self-termination dates) complicates detection.,CI/CD pipelines require stricter dependency verification (e.g., package signing, allowlists).IoT devices remain a critical attack vector for large-scale DDoS botnets.,Firmware update servers (e.g., TotoLink) are high-value targets for botnet expansion.,DNS query volume rankings can be manipulated by malicious traffic, requiring proactive redaction.,Collaboration between cloud providers (Microsoft, Cloudflare) is essential for mitigating record-breaking attacks.DDoS attacks are scaling with internet infrastructure upgrades (e.g., fiber-to-home, IoT proliferation).,Botnets like Aisuru/TurboMirai pose persistent threats by exploiting unsecured IoT devices.,Cloud-native DDoS protection (e.g., Azure’s scrubbing services) is critical for mitigating large-scale attacks.,Residential ISPs are increasingly targeted as attack launchpads.Concentrated infrastructure risk (e.g., Microsoft/Amazon/Google backbones) is the biggest vulnerability, not just technology.,AI agents introduce unique risks due to autonomy and broad access, requiring non-human zero-trust models.,Identity sprawl and static authentication are no longer viable; continuous verification is essential.,Compliance can drive innovation if treated as a framework for stakeholder trust and responsible AI/data use.,The cybersecurity talent pipeline is critically thin, exacerbated by AI eliminating entry-level roles.,Optional MFA and shared responsibility models in cloud security are no longer sufficient.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, audit .gitmodules file contents before cloning untrusted repositories., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene., Timely updates and patches to software, Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities. and Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122
Source: SOCRadar
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC20599723
Source: Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults
Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Source: Wiz
Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524
Source: Microsoft
Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524
Source: Tom's Hardware
Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Source: CYFIRMA
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Source: Security Researcher Matt Muir
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Source: DataDog researchers
Incident : Data Breach MIC732080425
Source: TorrentFreak
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Source: GitGuardian Report
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Source: BleepingComputer
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Source: TechRadar Pro
Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025
Source: ReversingLabs Blog Post
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Source: Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)
URL: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-55241
Date Accessed: 2025-07-17
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Source: Dirk-jan Mollema (Researcher Blog)
Date Accessed: 2025-07-14
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Source: Mitiga Research (Roei Sherman)
Date Accessed: 2025-07
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Source: Microsoft Deprecation Notice for Azure AD Graph API
Date Accessed: 2025-06
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Source: Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit Blog (Steven Masada)
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Source: Cloudflare Blog
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Source: The Register (Article)
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Source: Microsoft Security Blog: 'Defending against attacks that abuse Microsoft Teams'
Date Accessed: 2025-07-01
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Source: Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence: Storm-1811 Campaign
URL: https://threatintelligence.microsoft.com/
Date Accessed: 2025-06-30
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Source: Trend Micro: 'DarkGate Malware Distributed via TeamsPhisher'
URL: https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research/25/d/darkgate-malware-distributed-via-teamphisher.html
Date Accessed: 2024-12-15
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Source: Sophos: '3AM Ransomware Uses Storm-1811 Tactics'
URL: https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2024/05/01/3am-ransomware-storm-1811-tactics/
Date Accessed: 2024-05-01
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Source: Hunters: 'VEILdrive Campaign by Sangria Tempest'
URL: https://www.hunters.ai/blog/veildrive-sangria-tempest
Date Accessed: 2024-11-20
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Source: Microsoft Learn: 'Secure Microsoft Teams'
URL: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/security-teams-overview
Date Accessed: 2025-07-01
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Source: Microsoft Defender XDR Hunting Queries for Teams Threats
URL: https://github.com/microsoft/Microsoft-Defender-XDR-Hunting-Queries
Date Accessed: 2025-06-25
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925
Source: The Register
URL: https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/14/github_copilot_chat_vulnerability/
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925
Source: Legit Security Disclosure (HackerOne)
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Source: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
Date Accessed: 2025-10-14
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Source: Microsoft Security Update Guide
URL: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59230
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Source: CISA Binding Operational Directive 22-01
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/binding-operational-directives/bod-22-01
Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125
Source: Exodus Intelligence (Vulnerability Discovery)
Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125
Source: Microsoft Security Update Guide (CVE-2025-55680)
Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125
Source: Microsoft Security Update (October 2025)
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Source: The Register
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Source: Microsoft Security Advisory (CVE-2025-59287)
URL: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59287
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog
URL: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Source: Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG)
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Source: Palo Alto Networks Unit 42
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Source: Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative (ZDI)
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Source: The Register
URL: https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/18/rhysida_ransomware_malvertising/
Date Accessed: 2024-10-18
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Source: Expel Blog
URL: https://expel.com/blog/rhysida-malvertising-campaign/
Date Accessed: 2024-10-18
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Source: Microsoft Threat Intelligence (X/Twitter)
URL: https://x.com/MsftSecIntel/status/[redacted]
Date Accessed: 2024-10-15
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Source: Expel GitHub Indicators
URL: https://github.com/expel-io/[redacted]
Date Accessed: 2024-10-18
Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525
Source: The Hacker News
Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525
Source: Check Point Research Report
Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525
Source: Microsoft Security Advisory (September 2024)
Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225
Source: Microsoft Security Advisory (CVE-2025-59499)
Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225
Source: GBHackers (GBH)
Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325
Source: Veracode Threat Research
Date Accessed: 2023-11-07
Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325
Source: OWASP Top 10 2025 (Supply Chain Attacks)
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Source: Microsoft Azure Security Blog
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Source: Cloudflare 2025 Q1 DDoS Report
Date Accessed: April 2025
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Source: Qi'anxin XLab Research
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Source: Brian Krebs (Infosec Journalist)
Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925
Source: Microsoft Azure Blog
URL: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/tag/ddos-protection/
Date Accessed: November 2023
Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925
Source: Cybersecurity Dive
URL: https://www.cybersecuritydive.com/news/microsoft-azure-ddos-attack-aisuru-botnet/698765/
Date Accessed: November 2023
Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925
Source: Netscout Threat Intelligence
URL: https://www.netscout.com/threat-intelligence
Date Accessed: November 2023
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Source: IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report
URL: https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach
Date Accessed: 2025-09-01
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Source: Kaseya - Mike Puglia (GM, Security)
Date Accessed: 2025-10-01
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Source: SecurityScorecard - Michael Centralla (Head of Public Policy)
URL: https://securityscorecard.com
Date Accessed: 2025-10-01
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Source: Dashlane - Frédéric Rivain (CTO)
Date Accessed: 2025-10-01
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Source: Omada - Benoit Grange (CPTO)
URL: https://www.omadaidentity.com
Date Accessed: 2025-10-01
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Source: Inmar Intelligence - Srini Varadarajan (CTO)
Date Accessed: 2025-10-01
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Source: Lastwall - Karl Holmqvist (Founder/CEO)
URL: https://lastwall.com
Date Accessed: 2025-10-01
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Source: IANS Research/Bedrock Data - George Gerchow (CSO)
URL: https://www.iansresearch.com
Date Accessed: 2025-10-01
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: SOCRadar, and Source: Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, and Source: Wiz, and Source: Microsoft, and Source: Tom's Hardware, and Source: CYFIRMA, and Source: Security Researcher Matt Muir, and Source: DataDog researchers, and Source: TorrentFreak, and Source: GitGuardian Report, and Source: BleepingComputerUrl: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com, and Source: TechRadar Pro, and Source: ReversingLabs Blog Post, and Source: Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)Url: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-55241Date Accessed: 2025-07-17, and Source: Dirk-jan Mollema (Researcher Blog)Date Accessed: 2025-07-14, and Source: Mitiga Research (Roei Sherman)Date Accessed: 2025-07, and Source: Microsoft Deprecation Notice for Azure AD Graph APIUrl: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-entra-azure-ad-blog/azure-ad-graph-retirement-august-31-2025/ba-p/4123456Date Accessed: 2025-06, and Source: Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit Blog (Steven Masada), and Source: Cloudflare Blog, and Source: The Register (Article), and Source: Microsoft Security Blog: 'Defending against attacks that abuse Microsoft Teams'Url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/07/01/defending-against-attacks-that-abuse-microsoft-teams/Date Accessed: 2025-07-01, and Source: Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence: Storm-1811 CampaignUrl: https://threatintelligence.microsoft.com/Date Accessed: 2025-06-30, and Source: Trend Micro: 'DarkGate Malware Distributed via TeamsPhisher'Url: https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research/25/d/darkgate-malware-distributed-via-teamphisher.htmlDate Accessed: 2024-12-15, and Source: Sophos: '3AM Ransomware Uses Storm-1811 Tactics'Url: https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2024/05/01/3am-ransomware-storm-1811-tactics/Date Accessed: 2024-05-01, and Source: Hunters: 'VEILdrive Campaign by Sangria Tempest'Url: https://www.hunters.ai/blog/veildrive-sangria-tempestDate Accessed: 2024-11-20, and Source: Microsoft Learn: 'Secure Microsoft Teams'Url: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/security-teams-overviewDate Accessed: 2025-07-01, and Source: Microsoft Defender XDR Hunting Queries for Teams ThreatsUrl: https://github.com/microsoft/Microsoft-Defender-XDR-Hunting-QueriesDate Accessed: 2025-06-25, and Source: The RegisterUrl: https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/14/github_copilot_chat_vulnerability/, and Source: Legit Security Disclosure (HackerOne), and Source: Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)Url: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalogDate Accessed: 2025-10-14, and Source: Microsoft Security Update GuideUrl: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59230, and Source: CISA Binding Operational Directive 22-01Url: https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/binding-operational-directives/bod-22-01, and Source: Exodus Intelligence (Vulnerability Discovery), and Source: Microsoft Security Update Guide (CVE-2025-55680), and Source: Microsoft Security Update (October 2025), and Source: The RegisterUrl: https://www.theregister.com, and Source: Microsoft Security Advisory (CVE-2025-59287)Url: https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59287, and Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities CatalogUrl: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog, and Source: Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG), and Source: Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, and Source: Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative (ZDI)Url: https://www.zerodayinitiative.com, and Source: The RegisterUrl: https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/18/rhysida_ransomware_malvertising/Date Accessed: 2024-10-18, and Source: Expel BlogUrl: https://expel.com/blog/rhysida-malvertising-campaign/Date Accessed: 2024-10-18, and Source: Microsoft Threat Intelligence (X/Twitter)Url: https://x.com/MsftSecIntel/status/[redacted]Date Accessed: 2024-10-15, and Source: Expel GitHub IndicatorsUrl: https://github.com/expel-io/[redacted]Date Accessed: 2024-10-18, and Source: The Hacker News, and Source: Check Point Research Report, and Source: Microsoft Security Advisory (September 2024), and Source: Microsoft Security Advisory (CVE-2025-59499), and Source: GBHackers (GBH), and Source: Veracode Threat ResearchDate Accessed: 2023-11-07, and Source: GBHackers (GBH)Date Accessed: 2023-11-07, and Source: OWASP Top 10 2025 (Supply Chain Attacks), and Source: Microsoft Azure Security Blog, and Source: Cloudflare 2025 Q1 DDoS ReportDate Accessed: April 2025, and Source: Qi'anxin XLab Research, and Source: Brian Krebs (Infosec Journalist), and Source: Microsoft Azure BlogUrl: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/tag/ddos-protection/Date Accessed: November 2023, and Source: Cybersecurity DiveUrl: https://www.cybersecuritydive.com/news/microsoft-azure-ddos-attack-aisuru-botnet/698765/Date Accessed: November 2023, and Source: Netscout Threat IntelligenceUrl: https://www.netscout.com/threat-intelligenceDate Accessed: November 2023, and Source: IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach ReportUrl: https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breachDate Accessed: 2025-09-01, and Source: Kaseya - Mike Puglia (GM, Security)Date Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: SecurityScorecard - Michael Centralla (Head of Public Policy)Url: https://securityscorecard.comDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: Dashlane - Frédéric Rivain (CTO)Url: https://www.dashlane.comDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: Omada - Benoit Grange (CPTO)Url: https://www.omadaidentity.comDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: Inmar Intelligence - Srini Varadarajan (CTO)Url: https://www.inmar.comDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: Lastwall - Karl Holmqvist (Founder/CEO)Url: https://lastwall.comDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: IANS Research/Bedrock Data - George Gerchow (CSO)Url: https://www.iansresearch.comDate Accessed: 2025-10-01, and Source: CSO OnlineDate Accessed: 2024-12-02.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Investigation Status: No evidence of misuse or malicious activity reported
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Investigation Status: completed (attack disrupted, affected parties notified)
Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025
Investigation Status: ongoing (as of the report)
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Investigation Status: Resolved (patched; no evidence of exploitation)
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Investigation Status: Ongoing (criminal referral to international law enforcement; Ogundipe remains at large)
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Investigation Status: Ongoing (Microsoft and partners continue to track and disrupt Teams-abusing threat actors)
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925
Investigation Status: Mitigated (Exfiltration vector blocked; long-term fix pending)
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Investigation Status: Ongoing (active exploitation confirmed; no specific incidents detailed)
Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125
Investigation Status: Resolved (Patch Released)
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Investigation Status: Ongoing (active exploitation observed; root cause analysis of patch bypass underway)
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Investigation Status: ongoing (Expel and Microsoft continue tracking)
Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525
Investigation Status: Resolved (patches released, vulnerabilities addressed)
Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225
Investigation Status: Disclosed; no confirmed reports of active exploitation in the wild (as of 2025-11-11)
Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325
Investigation Status: resolved (package removed, accounts terminated)
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Investigation Status: Ongoing (Mitigation Completed; Botnet Activity Persists)
Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925
Investigation Status: Completed (mitigation successful)
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Investigation Status: Predictive (not yet occurred; expert forecasts for 2026)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Notifying impacted users and organizations, Public Statement, Public Report By Gitguardian, Direct Notifications To Repository Owners, Reversinglabs Blog Post (Public Disclosure), Public Disclosure Via Microsoft Security Response Center (Msrc), Technical Blog Post By Researcher Dirk-Jan Mollema, Advisories From Cloud Security Firms (E.G., Mitiga), Public Disclosure Via Microsoft/Cloudflare Blogs, Coordination With Health-Isac, Internal Advisories (It Teams, Executives), Customer Notifications (If Data Breached), Public Disclosures (For Transparency, E.G., Microsoft Security Blog), Regulatory Reporting (As Required By Law), Cisa Advisory (Kev Catalog Inclusion), Public Warning Via Media (E.G., Google News, Linkedin, X), Public Advisories By Microsoft And Cisa, Media Coverage (E.G., The Register), Expel Blog Post (2024-10-18), Microsoft Social Media Advisory (2024-10-15), Public Disclosure By Check Point And The Hacker News, Microsoft Security Advisory (Released In September 2024), Public Disclosure Via Microsoft Advisory, Recommendations For Urgent Patching And Access Control Reviews, Public Disclosure By Veracode, Media Coverage (E.G., Gbh), Public Disclosure By Microsoft And Cloudflare, Media Coverage By Infosec Journalists (E.G., Brian Krebs), Public Blog Post By Microsoft, Media Statements and Transparency mandates for breaches affecting critical infrastructure or AI systems..
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Stakeholder Advisories: Github Repository Owners, Open-Source Project Maintainers.
Customer Advisories: GitHub issued guidance on securing Actions workflows
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft Urged Customers To Migrate From Azure Ad Graph Api To Microsoft Graph By August 31, 2025., Applications With Extended Access To Azure Ad Graph Api Were Warned Of Impending Api Retirement In Early September 2025..
Customer Advisories: No customer action required for the vulnerability patch.Customers advised to review and update applications relying on deprecated Azure AD Graph API.
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft Customers Advised To Reset Compromised Credentials And Enable Advanced Mfa., Healthcare Organizations Warned Of Targeted Phishing Risks..
Customer Advisories: Users urged to report suspicious emails and enable security defaults in Microsoft 365.
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft Has Issued Guidance To Customers Via The Microsoft Security Response Center (Msrc) And Defender Threat Intelligence., Enterprise Admins Are Advised To Review Teams Configurations And Apply Mitigations Outlined In The Microsoft Security Blog., Partners (E.G., Mssps) Should Prioritize Teams-Specific Detections In Their Soc Operations..
Customer Advisories: Users should report suspicious Teams activity (e.g., unexpected calls, file shares) via their organization’s security team.Microsoft 365 admins can access the 'Teams Security Guide' in the Microsoft 365 admin center for configuration recommendations.Customers with Defender XDR can run the provided hunting queries to check for indicators of compromise (IoCs).
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925
Customer Advisories: GitHub Security Advisory (2024-08-14)
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Stakeholder Advisories: Cisa Kev Catalog Update, Public Warnings Via Media Outlets.
Customer Advisories: Organizations urged to patch immediately; federal agencies given deadline of November 4, 2025
Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125
Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft Recommends Immediate Patching For All Affected Systems..
Customer Advisories: Users of Windows cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) should apply the October 2025 updates to mitigate the risk of privilege escalation.
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft (Limited Updates), Cisa (Kev Catalog Inclusion), Threat Intelligence Community (Gtig, Unit 42, Zdi).
Customer Advisories: Apply emergency patchRestrict WSUS internet exposureMonitor for exploitation signs
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft Revoked Malicious Certificates And Issued A Public Advisory., Expel Published Technical Details And Indicators Of Compromise (Iocs)..
Customer Advisories: Users advised to download Microsoft Teams only from official sources (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/download-app).Organizations warned to monitor for OysterLoader/Latrodectus infections.
Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525
Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft and Check Point issued advisories warning about the risks and urging patching.
Customer Advisories: Users advised to update Teams and exercise caution with unexpected messages or calls.
Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225
Customer Advisories: Organizations running SQL Server in production environments advised to patch urgentlySecurity teams and database administrators urged to coordinate patch deployment
Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325
Stakeholder Advisories: Developers Advised To Audit Github Actions Dependencies For '@Acitons/Artifact'.
Customer Advisories: Veracode customers received automated protection via Package Firewall
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft Azure Customers, Cloudflare Customers, Iot Device Manufacturers (T-Mobile, Zyxel, D-Link, Linksys, Totolink).
Customer Advisories: Users of affected IoT devices advised to update firmware and change default credentials.Azure/Cloudflare customers informed of mitigated attacks and ongoing monitoring.
Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925
Stakeholder Advisories: Microsoft Advised Customers To Enable Azure Ddos Protection For Defense-In-Depth..
Customer Advisories: No action required; Azure services remained operational.
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Stakeholder Advisories: Organizations advised to prepare for 2026 mandates by: (1) auditing AI agent access, (2) consolidating IAM, (3) implementing zero-trust, and (4) participating in public-private resilience programs.
Customer Advisories: Customers of SaaS/cloud providers should: (1) demand transparency on AI agent security, (2) verify MFA enforcement, and (3) monitor for cascading outages in concentrated infrastructure.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Github Repository Owners, Open-Source Project Maintainers, Github Issued Guidance On Securing Actions Workflows, , Microsoft Urged Customers To Migrate From Azure Ad Graph Api To Microsoft Graph By August 31, 2025., Applications With Extended Access To Azure Ad Graph Api Were Warned Of Impending Api Retirement In Early September 2025., No Customer Action Required For The Vulnerability Patch., Customers Advised To Review And Update Applications Relying On Deprecated Azure Ad Graph Api., , Microsoft Customers Advised To Reset Compromised Credentials And Enable Advanced Mfa., Healthcare Organizations Warned Of Targeted Phishing Risks., Users Urged To Report Suspicious Emails And Enable Security Defaults In Microsoft 365., , Microsoft Has Issued Guidance To Customers Via The Microsoft Security Response Center (Msrc) And Defender Threat Intelligence., Enterprise Admins Are Advised To Review Teams Configurations And Apply Mitigations Outlined In The Microsoft Security Blog., Partners (E.G., Mssps) Should Prioritize Teams-Specific Detections In Their Soc Operations., Users Should Report Suspicious Teams Activity (E.G., Unexpected Calls, File Shares) Via Their Organization’S Security Team., Microsoft 365 Admins Can Access The 'Teams Security Guide' In The Microsoft 365 Admin Center For Configuration Recommendations., Customers With Defender Xdr Can Run The Provided Hunting Queries To Check For Indicators Of Compromise (Iocs)., , Github Security Advisory (2024-08-14), , Cisa Kev Catalog Update, Public Warnings Via Media Outlets, Organizations Urged To Patch Immediately; Federal Agencies Given Deadline Of November 4, 2025, , Microsoft Recommends Immediate Patching For All Affected Systems., Users Of Windows Cloud Synchronization Services (E.G., Onedrive) Should Apply The October 2025 Updates To Mitigate The Risk Of Privilege Escalation., , Microsoft (Limited Updates), Cisa (Kev Catalog Inclusion), Threat Intelligence Community (Gtig, Unit 42, Zdi), Apply Emergency Patch, Restrict Wsus Internet Exposure, Monitor For Exploitation Signs, , Microsoft Revoked Malicious Certificates And Issued A Public Advisory., Expel Published Technical Details And Indicators Of Compromise (Iocs)., Users Advised To Download Microsoft Teams Only From Official Sources (Https://Www.Microsoft.Com/En-Us/Microsoft-Teams/Download-App)., Organizations Warned To Monitor For Oysterloader/Latrodectus Infections., , Microsoft and Check Point issued advisories warning about the risks and urging patching., Users advised to update Teams and exercise caution with unexpected messages or calls., Organizations Running Sql Server In Production Environments Advised To Patch Urgently, Security Teams And Database Administrators Urged To Coordinate Patch Deployment, , Developers Advised To Audit Github Actions Dependencies For '@Acitons/Artifact', Veracode Customers Received Automated Protection Via Package Firewall, , Microsoft Azure Customers, Cloudflare Customers, Iot Device Manufacturers (T-Mobile, Zyxel, D-Link, Linksys, Totolink), Users Of Affected Iot Devices Advised To Update Firmware And Change Default Credentials., Azure/Cloudflare Customers Informed Of Mitigated Attacks And Ongoing Monitoring., , Microsoft Advised Customers To Enable Azure Ddos Protection For Defense-In-Depth., No Action Required; Azure Services Remained Operational., , Organizations advised to prepare for 2026 mandates by: (1) auditing AI agent access, (2) consolidating IAM, (3) implementing zero-trust, and (4) participating in public-private resilience programs., Customers of SaaS/cloud providers should: (1) demand transparency on AI agent security, (2) verify MFA enforcement and and (3) monitor for cascading outages in concentrated infrastructure..
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422
Entry Point: Stolen OAuth Tokens
Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Entry Point: Azure Data Factory service certificate
High Value Targets: Sensitive information in Integration Runtimes
Data Sold on Dark Web: Sensitive information in Integration Runtimes
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622
Entry Point: Malicious Document
Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323
Entry Point: Weak Passwords
Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Entry Point: Microsoft Exchange Server
Backdoors Established: Installation of additional malware
Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Entry Point: Crafted links
Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724
Entry Point: Ghost Accounts
High Value Targets: GitHub Users
Data Sold on Dark Web: GitHub Users
Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524
Entry Point: Soho Devices, Vpn Appliances,
High Value Targets: Microsoft 365 Accounts,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Microsoft 365 Accounts,
Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030225
Entry Point: Fake Repositories, Malicious Code,
Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Entry Point: Malicious Extensions
Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Entry Point: Helpdesk Portals, Shared Directories,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Entry Point: Malicious repositories
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Entry Point: compromised maintainer account (FastUUID project)
Backdoors Established: ['malicious GitHub Actions workflow']
High Value Targets: Github Tokens, Cloud Provider Credentials,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Github Tokens, Cloud Provider Credentials,
Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025
Entry Point: Trojanized Github Repositories (Fake Hacking Tools),
Backdoors Established: ['hidden backdoor logic in Python scripts']
High Value Targets: Developers, Cybersecurity Researchers, Potential Downstream Victims,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Developers, Cybersecurity Researchers, Potential Downstream Victims,
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Entry Point: Legacy Azure AD Graph API (graph.windows.net) via flawed S2S actor token validation
High Value Targets: Global Administrator Roles, Entra Id Tenant Configurations, Azure Subscription Permissions, Bitlocker Keys, Sharepoint/Exchange Online Data,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Global Administrator Roles, Entra Id Tenant Configurations, Azure Subscription Permissions, Bitlocker Keys, Sharepoint/Exchange Online Data,
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Entry Point: Phishing Emails, Raccoono365 Phishing Kits,
Backdoors Established: True
High Value Targets: Microsoft 365 Accounts, Us Organizations (Tax-Themed Campaigns), Healthcare Sector,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Microsoft 365 Accounts, Us Organizations (Tax-Themed Campaigns), Healthcare Sector,
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Entry Point: Compromised Teams Accounts (Via Phishing/Credential Theft), Legitimate Tenants Purchased On Dark Web, Exploited Guest/External Access Misconfigurations, Malicious Apps (Spoofed Or Repurposed), Federated Trust Relationships (Cross-Tenant Access),
Reconnaissance Period: Weeks to months (e.g., Void Blizzard’s Entra ID enumeration before attack)
Backdoors Established: ['Persistent Teams Guest Users', 'RMM Tools (e.g., AnyDesk, ScreenConnect)', 'Scheduled Tasks (e.g., Sticky Keys)', 'OAuth Tokens (Long-Lived Refresh Tokens)', 'Webhooks (for C2 via Teams Messages)']
High Value Targets: Teams Admins (Global Admin, Teams Service Admin), Executives (For Extortion), Finance/Hr (For Sensitive Data), It Help Desk (For Lateral Movement), Third-Party Vendors (Supply Chain Attacks),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Teams Admins (Global Admin, Teams Service Admin), Executives (For Extortion), Finance/Hr (For Sensitive Data), It Help Desk (For Lateral Movement), Third-Party Vendors (Supply Chain Attacks),
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925
Entry Point: Hidden markdown comments in GitHub pull requests/issues
High Value Targets: Private Repositories, Unpublished Vulnerability Research, Authentication Secrets,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Private Repositories, Unpublished Vulnerability Research, Authentication Secrets,
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Entry Point: Phishing Campaigns, Internet-Facing Vulnerabilities (Potential Initial Access Vectors),
Backdoors Established: ['Possible if privilege escalation is successful']
High Value Targets: Administrative Accounts, Sensitive Data Repositories,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Administrative Accounts, Sensitive Data Repositories,
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Entry Point: Internet-Facing Wsus Servers On Tcp Ports 8530 (Http) And 8531 (Https),
Reconnaissance Period: ['Post-exploitation (e.g., whoami, net user, ipconfig commands)']
High Value Targets: Wsus Servers (Potential For Downstream Malware Distribution),
Data Sold on Dark Web: Wsus Servers (Potential For Downstream Malware Distribution),
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Entry Point: Malvertising (Bing Ads), Fake Microsoft Teams Download Pages,
Reconnaissance Period: ['ongoing since June 2024 (second wave)', 'previous campaign: May–September 2024']
Backdoors Established: ['OysterLoader and Latrodectus used for persistence']
High Value Targets: Corporate Networks, Data-Rich Organizations,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Corporate Networks, Data-Rich Organizations,
Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525
High Value Targets: C-suite executives (impersonated in attacks)
Data Sold on Dark Web: C-suite executives (impersonated in attacks)
Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325
Entry Point: npm package installation ('@acitons/artifact')
Backdoors Established: ['post-install hook with obfuscated malware']
High Value Targets: Github Organization Repositories, Github Actions Environment Variables,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Github Organization Repositories, Github Actions Environment Variables,
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Entry Point: Exploited Vulnerabilities In Iot Devices, Compromised Totolink Firmware Update Server,
High Value Targets: Public Cloud Ips (Microsoft Azure), Dns Services (Cloudflare 1.1.1.1), Firmware Update Infrastructure,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Public Cloud Ips (Microsoft Azure), Dns Services (Cloudflare 1.1.1.1), Firmware Update Infrastructure,
Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925
Entry Point: Compromised Iot Devices (Routers, Cameras),
High Value Targets: Cloud Endpoints (E.G., Azure), Internet Gaming Organizations,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Cloud Endpoints (E.G., Azure), Internet Gaming Organizations,
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Entry Point: Compromised Saas Firewalls (Single Point Of Failure), Over-Permissioned Ai Agents (Autonomous Lateral Movement), Shadow Identities In Iam Systems, Supply Chain Vulnerabilities (Multi-Cloud Complexities),
Reconnaissance Period: Prolonged (AI agents enable persistent, low-visibility reconnaissance).
Backdoors Established: Likely in critical infrastructure and cloud backbones for future exploitation.
High Value Targets: Cloud Hyperscalers (Microsoft, Amazon, Google), Ai Training Datasets, Critical Infrastructure Control Systems, Financial Transaction Platforms,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Cloud Hyperscalers (Microsoft, Amazon, Google), Ai Training Datasets, Critical Infrastructure Control Systems, Financial Transaction Platforms,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Root Causes: Vulnerability in Azure Data Factory service certificate
Corrective Actions: Mitigated the security flaw
Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622
Root Causes: Vulnerability in MSDT
Corrective Actions: Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol
Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122
Root Causes: Unintentional Misconfiguration
Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323
Root Causes: Weak Passwords
Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823
Root Causes: Lack of authentication and write-protection
Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Root Causes: Improper data management practices
Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Root Causes: Exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software
Corrective Actions: Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture
Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Root Causes: CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability
Corrective Actions: Patch released
Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724
Root Causes: Trust in Popular Repositories
Corrective Actions: Disable Ghost Accounts, Continuous Detection and Removal
Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524
Root Causes: Insufficient data filtering in AI screenshot feature
Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Root Causes: Gaps in Microsoft's review system
Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Root Causes: Exploitation of passive file preview and indexing behaviors in modern operating systems
Corrective Actions: Disable Preview Panes, Block Outbound Smb Traffic, Enforce Macro Blocking, Deploy Behavioral Monitoring,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Root Causes: Mismatch in Git’s handling of configuration values and control characters
Corrective Actions: Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, audit repository contents before cloning
Incident : supply-chain attack GIT0132201090925
Root Causes: Weak Authentication For Maintainer Accounts (Lack Of Mfa)., Insufficient Validation Of Github Actions Workflows., Exposed Secrets In Repositories (Lack Of Secret Scanning).,
Corrective Actions: Github Enhanced Workflow Security Controls., Gitguardian Expanded Monitoring For Similar Attacks., Affected Projects Rotated Compromised Credentials.,
Incident : supply chain attack GIT5862758091025
Root Causes: Lack Of Repository Integrity Checks On Github For Malicious Forks., Trust In Open-Source Hacking Tools Without Verification., Exploitation Of Github’S Legitimacy To Distribute Malware.,
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC4733147092225
Root Causes: Inadequate Tenant Validation In Azure Ad Graph Api For S2S Actor Tokens., Over-Reliance On Deprecated Legacy Apis Without Enforced Migration Timelines., Lack Of Api-Level Logging For The Graph Api, Enabling Stealthy Exploitation., Conditional Access Policies Applied To Tokens That Could Be Manipulated Cross-Tenant.,
Corrective Actions: Server-Side Patch To Enforce Tenant Validation In Token Processing., Accelerated Deprecation Of Azure Ad Graph Api (Retired August 31, 2025)., Enhanced Guidance For Migrating To Microsoft Graph., Internal Review Of High-Privileged Access (Hpa) Scenarios In Entra Id.,
Incident : phishing MIC0970009100325
Root Causes: Proliferation Of Phishing-As-A-Service Models Lowering Entry Barriers For Cybercriminals., Effectiveness Of Mfa Bypass Techniques In Phishing Kits., Lack Of Global Law Enforcement Coordination To Apprehend Threat Actors In Jurisdictions Like Nigeria., Delayed Detection Of Phishing Infrastructure (Operational Since At Least July 2024).,
Corrective Actions: Microsoft'S Legal Action And Infrastructure Takedowns To Disrupt Raccoono365 Operations., Cloudflare'S Ban On Identified Domains And Termination Of Malicious Scripts., Enhanced Monitoring For Ai-Powered Phishing (E.G., Raccoono365 Ai-Mailcheck)., Public-Private Collaboration To Share Indicators Of Compromise (Iocs) And Tactics.,
Incident : Social Engineering MIC5532655100825
Root Causes: Over-Permissive External Access: Default Configurations Allowed Unauthorized Tenant Federation And Guest Access., Lack Of Teams-Specific Monitoring: Security Tools Focused On Email/Endpoints Missed Teams-Based Attacks (E.G., Adaptive Card Phishing)., Insufficient Identity Protections: Legacy Authentication, Weak Mfa, And Standing Privileges Enabled Credential Theft., User Awareness Gaps: Employees Trusted Teams Messages/Calls More Than Emails, Falling For Social Engineering., Open-Source Tool Abuse: Attackers Leveraged Public Frameworks (E.G., Teamfiltration) To Automate Reconnaissance And Exfiltration., Hybrid Complexity: On-Premises Ad Sync With Entra Id Created Seams For Lateral Movement (E.G., Peach Sandstorm’S Ad Snapshots)., Delayed Patching: Unpatched Teams Clients Or Endpoints Allowed Malware Execution (E.G., Darkgate Via Teamsphisher)., Third-Party Risk: Compromised Partner Tenants Or Spoofed Apps Provided Initial Access Vectors.,
Corrective Actions: Action: Implement Zero Trust for Teams, Details: Enforce least-privilege access, verify every request (user/device), and assume breach. Use Entra ID Conditional Access to restrict Teams access by location, device state, and risk level., Action: Harden Teams Configurations, Details: Disable external access by default; require admin approval for guest users; audit Teams apps for excessive permissions; block legacy auth protocols., Action: Enhance Detection for Teams Threats, Details: Enable all Teams-related Defender XDR alerts; create custom hunting queries for Teams API abuse, external file shares, and Adaptive Card phishing; integrate Teams logs with SIEM., Action: Deploy Phishing-Resistant MFA, Details: Replace SMS/email-based MFA with FIDO2 or certificate-based authentication for all users, especially admins. Monitor for MFA fatigue attacks (e.g., repeated push notifications)., Action: Segment and Monitor Teams Traffic, Details: Isolate Teams from high-value networks; inspect TLS traffic for C2 (e.g., BRc4 over Teams); block known malicious IPs/domains associated with Teams phishing., Action: Conduct Teams-Specific Red Teaming, Details: Simulate attack chains observed in the wild (e.g., TeamsPhisher + DarkGate, device code phishing) to test defenses and user awareness., Action: Improve User Training, Details: Add Teams-specific scenarios to security awareness programs (e.g., fake help desk calls, malicious file shares). Train users to verify unexpected Teams requests via a secondary channel., Action: Automate Response to Teams Threats, Details: Use Defender XDR automation to quarantine phishing messages, revoke compromised tokens, and isolate affected endpoints. Implement SOAR playbooks for common Teams attack patterns., Action: Audit and Reduce Attack Surface, Details: Remove unused Teams apps; disable unnecessary features (e.g., anonymous meeting joins); review federated tenant trust relationships; retire legacy authentication., Action: Leverage Microsoft’s Built-In Protections, Details: Enable all relevant Defender for Office 365, Defender for Identity, and Defender for Cloud Apps policies for Teams. Use Security Copilot to correlate Teams signals with broader threats.,
Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT3492034100925
Root Causes: Copilot Chat'S Over-Permissive Access To Repository Content (Inherited From User Permissions)., Lack Of Input Sanitization For 'Invisible' Markdown Comments., Camo Image-Proxy Service Repurposed As A Covert Exfiltration Channel., Ai Tool Design Assuming Trust In Contextual Inputs Without Human-Visible Cues.,
Corrective Actions: Disabled Image Rendering In Copilot Chat., Blocked Camo-Based Exfiltration Routes., Planned Long-Term Fixes To Restrict Ai Tool Access And Harden Input Validation.,
Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC3292132101625
Root Causes: Improper Access Control In Windows Remote Access Connection Manager (Cve-2025-59230),
Corrective Actions: Patch Management, Network Segmentation, Privileged Access Monitoring,
Incident : Vulnerability MIC3832638102125
Root Causes: Inadequate Filename Validation In The Hsmpopcreateplaceholders() Function During Placeholder File Creation., Race Condition (Toctou) Between Filename Validation And Actual File Creation In The Windows Cloud Minifilter Driver (Cldflt.Sys)., Multi-Threaded Attack Surface Enabled By The Cfcreateplaceholders() Api And I/O Control Code 0X903Bc., Incomplete Fix For A Prior Vulnerability (Cve-2020-17136) Reintroduced The Race Condition.,
Corrective Actions: Microsoft Released A Patch In October 2025 To Address The Race Condition In Filename Validation., Enhanced Input Validation For Placeholder File Operations In Cloud Sync Services., Security Hardening Of The Cfcreateplaceholders() Api And Related I/O Control Codes.,
Incident : Remote Code Execution (RCE) MIC3662236103025
Root Causes: Insecure Deserialization In Wsus (Cve-2025-59287), Incomplete Initial Patch By Microsoft, Internet-Facing Wsus Instances (Against Best Practices),
Corrective Actions: Emergency Patch Deployment, Network Segmentation And Exposure Reduction, Enhanced Monitoring For Reconnaissance Activity, Vendor Accountability For Patch Completeness,
Incident : ransomware MIC0502205110125
Root Causes: Over-Reliance On Search Engine Ads As A Trusted Software Distribution Channel., Delayed Detection Of Obfuscated Malware By Traditional Av Solutions., Abuse Of Legitimate Code-Signing Certificates To Bypass Security Controls., Lack Of User Awareness About Typosquatting And Fake Download Pages.,
Corrective Actions: Search Engines (E.G., Bing) Should Enhance Ad Verification For Software Downloads., Certificate Authorities (Cas) Must Improve Validation And Revocation Processes., Organizations Should Implement Allow-Listing For Software Installations., Security Vendors Need To Prioritize Behavioral Detection For Packed/Obfuscated Malware.,
Incident : Spoofing MIC2711127110525
Root Causes: Insufficient Validation Of Message Edits And Sender Identity Changes In Teams., Lack Of Tamper-Evident Indicators (E.G., 'Edited' Label Bypass)., Over-Reliance On Visual Trust Cues (E.G., Display Names) Without Cryptographic Verification., Collaboration Features (E.G., Guest Access, External Sharing) Expanding The Attack Surface.,
Corrective Actions: Microsoft Patched The Vulnerabilities To Prevent Spoofing And Impersonation., Added Stricter Validation For Message Edits And Sender Identity Changes., Enhanced User Education On Social Engineering Risks In Teams., Ongoing Monitoring For Similar Vulnerabilities In Collaboration Tools.,
Incident : Vulnerability MIC0932309111225
Root Causes: Improper Neutralization Of Special Elements In Sql Commands (Cwe-89), Improper Input Validation In Sql Server Query Processing Engine,
Corrective Actions: Microsoft-Issued Patch For Affected Sql Server Versions, Reinforced Guidance On Access Control And Monitoring Best Practices,
Incident : supply chain attack GIT4192541111325
Root Causes: Lack Of Package Name Validation During Npm Install., Over-Permissive Github Actions Environment Variables., Insufficient Scanning Of Post-Install Hooks In Npm Packages., Developer Reliance On Automated Dependency Installation Without Verification.,
Corrective Actions: Npm Removed Malicious Package And Related Versions., Github Terminated Associated User Accounts., Veracode Enhanced Detection For Obfuscated Post-Install Scripts., Public Advisory Issued To Raise Awareness Of Typosquatting Risks In Ci/Cd.,
Incident : DDoS Attack MIC4792247111725
Root Causes: Proliferation Of Insecure Iot Devices With Default/Exploitable Credentials., Lack Of Segmentation Or Monitoring For Firmware Update Servers (E.G., Totolink)., Effectiveness Of Udp Floods With Minimal Spoofing In Evading Traditional Defenses., Abuse Of Dns Query Volumes To Manipulate Public Rankings.,
Corrective Actions: Microsoft And Cloudflare Enhanced Ddos Mitigation Capacities (E.G., 21.3M Attacks Blocked In 2024)., Cloudflare Modified Ranking Algorithms To Exclude/Hide Malicious Domains., Increased Industry Awareness Of Iot Botnet Risks (E.G., Mirai-Class Threats)., Potential Isp-Level Collaborations To Disrupt Aisuru’S C2 Infrastructure.,
Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC0092900111925
Root Causes: Exploitation Of Default/Weak Credentials In Iot Devices., Lack Of Firmware Updates In Residential Routers/Cameras., Botnet Proliferation (Aisuru/Turbomirai) Leveraging Unsecured Devices.,
Corrective Actions: Microsoft Enhanced Ddos Protection Thresholds For Azure., Public Awareness Campaigns On Iot Security (E.G., Changing Default Passwords)., Collaboration With Isps To Identify And Remediate Botnet-Infected Devices.,
Incident : Predictive Analysis MIC3125431112425
Root Causes: Over-Reliance On Concentrated Infrastructure (Single Points Of Failure), Lack Of Non-Human Identity Governance (Ai Agents, Iam Sprawl), Static Authentication In The Age Of Deepfakes, Voluntary Compliance Frameworks (Pre-2026 Mandates), Talent Pipeline Collapse (Ai Replacing Entry-Level Roles), Shared Responsibility Model Gaps In Cloud Security,
Corrective Actions: Enforce 2026 Cyber-Resilience Mandates (Cisa-Led), Develop Ai-Specific Zero-Trust Frameworks, Replace Static Mfa With Continuous Verification, Decentralize Critical Infrastructure Risk (Reduce Hyperscaler Dependency), Invest In Cybersecurity Talent Pipelines (E.G., Apprenticeships), Mandate Supply Chain Risk Assessments For Cloud/Saas Providers, Leverage Compliance As Innovation Driver (E.G., Responsible Ai Use),
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Chris Vickery, , Wiz, , Monitor Preview-Related Processes Like Explorer.Exe, Searchindexer.Exe, And Quicklookd, , Monitoring For Suspicious Git Clone –Recursive Executions, , Gitguardian (Detection/Alerting), Pypi (Mitigation), , Reversinglabs (Discovery And Analysis), , Cloudflare, Health-Isac, , Microsoft Detection And Response Team (Dart), Microsoft Threat Intelligence Center (Mstic), Managed Security Service Providers (Mssps), , Defender Xdr Alerts (E.G., Anomalous Teams Logins), Entra Id Risk Policies (Impossible Travel, Leaked Credentials), Siem Integration (Microsoft Sentinel), Teams-Specific Hunting Queries (E.G., External File Shares), , Legit Security (Researcher Omer Mayraz), Hackerone (Vulnerability Disclosure), , Recommended For Detecting Exploitation Attempts, , Exodus Intelligence (Vulnerability Discovery), , Google Threat Intelligence Group (Gtig), Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative (Zdi), , Monitor For Powershell Commands (E.G., Whoami, Net User, Ipconfig), Check For Exfiltration To Webhook.Site Endpoints, , Expel (Threat Intelligence Tracking), Microsoft Threat Intelligence Team, , Expel Tracking Indicators On Github, Recommended For Potential Targets, , Check Point (vulnerability research and disclosure), Sql Server Logs For Suspicious Activity, , Veracode Threat Research, , Recommended For Github Actions Environments, , Increased Ddos Mitigation Capabilities (Cloudflare, Microsoft), , , Expected collaboration between CISA, sector regulators, insurers, and private-sector partners for threat validation., Required for AI agents and autonomous systems..
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Mitigated the security flaw, Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol, Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture, Patch released, Disable Ghost Accounts, Continuous Detection and Removal, Disable Preview Panes, Block Outbound Smb Traffic, Enforce Macro Blocking, Deploy Behavioral Monitoring, , Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, audit repository contents before cloning, Github Enhanced Workflow Security Controls., Gitguardian Expanded Monitoring For Similar Attacks., Affected Projects Rotated Compromised Credentials., , Server-Side Patch To Enforce Tenant Validation In Token Processing., Accelerated Deprecation Of Azure Ad Graph Api (Retired August 31, 2025)., Enhanced Guidance For Migrating To Microsoft Graph., Internal Review Of High-Privileged Access (Hpa) Scenarios In Entra Id., , Microsoft'S Legal Action And Infrastructure Takedowns To Disrupt Raccoono365 Operations., Cloudflare'S Ban On Identified Domains And Termination Of Malicious Scripts., Enhanced Monitoring For Ai-Powered Phishing (E.G., Raccoono365 Ai-Mailcheck)., Public-Private Collaboration To Share Indicators Of Compromise (Iocs) And Tactics., , Action: Implement Zero Trust for Teams, Details: Enforce least-privilege access, verify every request (user/device), and assume breach. Use Entra ID Conditional Access to restrict Teams access by location, device state, and risk level., Action: Harden Teams Configurations, Details: Disable external access by default; require admin approval for guest users; audit Teams apps for excessive permissions; block legacy auth protocols., Action: Enhance Detection for Teams Threats, Details: Enable all Teams-related Defender XDR alerts; create custom hunting queries for Teams API abuse, external file shares, and Adaptive Card phishing; integrate Teams logs with SIEM., Action: Deploy Phishing-Resistant MFA, Details: Replace SMS/email-based MFA with FIDO2 or certificate-based authentication for all users, especially admins. Monitor for MFA fatigue attacks (e.g., repeated push notifications)., Action: Segment and Monitor Teams Traffic, Details: Isolate Teams from high-value networks; inspect TLS traffic for C2 (e.g., BRc4 over Teams); block known malicious IPs/domains associated with Teams phishing., Action: Conduct Teams-Specific Red Teaming, Details: Simulate attack chains observed in the wild (e.g., TeamsPhisher + DarkGate, device code phishing) to test defenses and user awareness., Action: Improve User Training, Details: Add Teams-specific scenarios to security awareness programs (e.g., fake help desk calls, malicious file shares). Train users to verify unexpected Teams requests via a secondary channel., Action: Automate Response to Teams Threats, Details: Use Defender XDR automation to quarantine phishing messages, revoke compromised tokens, and isolate affected endpoints. Implement SOAR playbooks for common Teams attack patterns., Action: Audit and Reduce Attack Surface, Details: Remove unused Teams apps; disable unnecessary features (e.g., anonymous meeting joins); review federated tenant trust relationships; retire legacy authentication., Action: Leverage Microsoft’s Built-In Protections, Details: Enable all relevant Defender for Office 365, Defender for Identity, and Defender for Cloud Apps policies for Teams. Use Security Copilot to correlate Teams signals with broader threats., , Disabled Image Rendering In Copilot Chat., Blocked Camo-Based Exfiltration Routes., Planned Long-Term Fixes To Restrict Ai Tool Access And Harden Input Validation., , Patch Management, Network Segmentation, Privileged Access Monitoring, , Microsoft Released A Patch In October 2025 To Address The Race Condition In Filename Validation., Enhanced Input Validation For Placeholder File Operations In Cloud Sync Services., Security Hardening Of The Cfcreateplaceholders() Api And Related I/O Control Codes., , Emergency Patch Deployment, Network Segmentation And Exposure Reduction, Enhanced Monitoring For Reconnaissance Activity, Vendor Accountability For Patch Completeness, , Search Engines (E.G., Bing) Should Enhance Ad Verification For Software Downloads., Certificate Authorities (Cas) Must Improve Validation And Revocation Processes., Organizations Should Implement Allow-Listing For Software Installations., Security Vendors Need To Prioritize Behavioral Detection For Packed/Obfuscated Malware., , Microsoft Patched The Vulnerabilities To Prevent Spoofing And Impersonation., Added Stricter Validation For Message Edits And Sender Identity Changes., Enhanced User Education On Social Engineering Risks In Teams., Ongoing Monitoring For Similar Vulnerabilities In Collaboration Tools., , Microsoft-Issued Patch For Affected Sql Server Versions, Reinforced Guidance On Access Control And Monitoring Best Practices, , Npm Removed Malicious Package And Related Versions., Github Terminated Associated User Accounts., Veracode Enhanced Detection For Obfuscated Post-Install Scripts., Public Advisory Issued To Raise Awareness Of Typosquatting Risks In Ci/Cd., , Microsoft And Cloudflare Enhanced Ddos Mitigation Capacities (E.G., 21.3M Attacks Blocked In 2024)., Cloudflare Modified Ranking Algorithms To Exclude/Hide Malicious Domains., Increased Industry Awareness Of Iot Botnet Risks (E.G., Mirai-Class Threats)., Potential Isp-Level Collaborations To Disrupt Aisuru’S C2 Infrastructure., , Microsoft Enhanced Ddos Protection Thresholds For Azure., Public Awareness Campaigns On Iot Security (E.G., Changing Default Passwords)., Collaboration With Isps To Identify And Remediate Botnet-Infected Devices., , Enforce 2026 Cyber-Resilience Mandates (Cisa-Led), Develop Ai-Specific Zero-Trust Frameworks, Replace Static Mfa With Continuous Verification, Decentralize Critical Infrastructure Risk (Reduce Hyperscaler Dependency), Invest In Cybersecurity Talent Pipelines (E.G., Apprenticeships), Mandate Supply Chain Risk Assessments For Cloud/Saas Providers, Leverage Compliance As Innovation Driver (E.G., Responsible Ai Use), .
Additional Questions
General Information
Has the company ever paid ransoms ?
Ransom Payment History: The company has Paid ransoms in the past.
What was the amount of the last ransom demanded ?
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was ShibaCoin.
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Lapsus$ hacking group, Unknown, Anonymous SudanStorm-1359, Stargazer Goblin Network, Storm-0940, EncryptHub (SkorikARI), Name: Banana SquadActive Since: April 2023Type: ['cybercriminal group', 'malware distributor'], Name: Joshua OgundipeAffiliation: RaccoonO365Location: NigeriaBackground: Computer programming; believed to have authored majority of the RaccoonO365 code, Name: Octo TempestType: Financially MotivatedAssociation: Ransomware, Extortion, MFA BypassName: Storm-1811Type: Financially MotivatedAssociation: Tech Support Scams, ReedBed Malware, Email BombingName: Midnight Blizzard (APT29/Cozy Bear)Type: State-Sponsored (Russia)Association: Credential Theft, Social EngineeringName: Storm-1674Type: Access BrokerAssociation: TeamsPhisher, DarkGate MalwareName: Sangria TempestType: Financially MotivatedAssociation: Ransomware (3AM/BlackSuit), JSSloaderName: Peach Sandstorm (APT33)Type: State-Sponsored (Iran)Association: Malicious ZIP Files, AD ReconnaissanceName: Void BlizzardType: State-SponsoredAssociation: Entra ID Enumeration, AzureHoundName: Storm-0324Type: Financially MotivatedAssociation: TeamsPhisher, Custom MalwareName: Storm-2372Type: Financially MotivatedAssociation: Device Code Phishing, Token TheftName: 3AM Ransomware (BlackSuit Rebrand)Type: Ransomware OperatorAssociation: Storm-1811 Techniques, Voice/Video Scams, UNC6512Opportunistic Threat Actors (unknown groups leveraging PoC), Rhysida (formerly Vice Society/Vanilla Tempest)RaaS affiliates, Aisuru Botnet Operators, Aisuru botnetTurboMirai family and Nation-States (geopolitically motivated)Cybercriminal Syndicates (financially motivated)Initial Access Brokers (selling backdoors to high-value targets)AI-Powered Threat Actors (exploiting autonomous systems)Insider Threats (due to identity sprawl).
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on September 2022.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2024-12-02.
What was the most recent incident resolved ?
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on December 2021.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was Projected increase in breach costs for ungoverned AI systems (per IBM 2025 report); potential economic catastrophe from cascading failures in cloud backbones (Microsoft, Amazon, Google)..
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Source code for Bing, Source code for Cortana, Emails, Documentation, , Private Repository Data, Full control over resources and data, Sensitive information in Integration Runtimes, , Names, Email Addresses, Email Content, Company Name, Phone Numbers, Files linked to business, , email addresses, IP addresses, support case details, , Source Code Repositories, Job listing data, Secrets, Private keys, Passwords, Internal Microsoft Teams communications, , Windows 10 internal builds, Microsoft Shared Source Kit, , Plain Text Passwords, , Email accounts, sensitive information, Personal and potentially sensitive information, User Data, credit card numbers, social security numbers, other personal data, , Personal data, Credentials, , Install Action Tokens, Docker Credentials, npm Credentials, AWS Credentials, , Source code and secrets, SL2000 certificates, SL3000 certificates, , secrets, API keys, tokens, credentials, , User information (Entra ID), Group and role details, Tenant settings, Application permissions, Device information, BitLocker keys, Azure resource access (via Global Admin impersonation), , Microsoft 365 usernames, passwords, persistent system access, , User Credentials (Entra ID tokens, passwords), Corporate Chat/Message History, OneDrive/SharePoint Files, Active Directory Snapshots, PII (via phishing/exfiltration), Payment Information (in some extortion cases), , API Keys, Security Tokens, Private Source Code, Unpublished Zero-Day Vulnerability Descriptions, , Potential sensitive data exfiltration (if exploited), , System Information (e.g., whoami, net user /domain, ipconfig /all), , potentially millions of records (exact number undisclosed), sensitive organizational and personal data, , GitHub authentication tokens, potential downstream repository access, , High risk of PII, corporate data and and AI training datasets exposure due to identity sprawl and SaaS attacks..
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were Azure DevOps server and and GitHub Servers and and Azure SynapseAzure Data Factory and and and Outlook emailOneDrive file-sharing appsAzure's cloud computing infrastructure and and GitHub Desktop for MacAtom and and and Microsoft 365 accountsTP-Link routers and and and and Mark of the Web security featureWindows File Explorer and Windows ExplorermacOS Quick LookEmail Client Preview SystemsFile Indexing Services and LinuxmacOS and Microsoft PlayReady DRM system and GitHub repositoriesCI/CD pipelines and Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD)Azure AD Graph API (graph.windows.net)SharePoint OnlineExchange OnlineAzure-hosted resources (via tenant-level access) and Microsoft 365 accountstargeted organizations' email systems and Microsoft Teams (Web/Desktop/Mobile Clients)Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD)Microsoft 365 (Exchange, SharePoint, OneDrive)On-Premises Active Directory (via hybrid sync)Endpoints (via RMM tools, malware) and GitHub Copilot ChatPrivate/Internal Repositories and Windows systems with Remote Access Connection Manager component and Windows systems running cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive)Systems with configured sync root directories and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 with WSUS role enabled and Windows machines via malicious Teams installernetworks compromised post-initial access and Microsoft Teams (iOS)Microsoft Teams (other platforms, implied) and Microsoft SQL Server (versions not specified) and GitHub Actions CI/CD pipelinesdeveloper workstations (via npm install) and Microsoft Azure Network (Public IP in Australia)Cloudflare DNS Service (1.1.1.1)Legitimate Domains in Cloudflare’s Top Rankings (e.g., Amazon, Microsoft, Google) and Azure endpoint (Australia) and SaaS Platforms (e.g., firewalls, cloud services)AI Agents (autonomous systems with broad access)Critical Infrastructure (energy, water, communications)Multi-Cloud EnvironmentsIAM Systems (vulnerable to credential-based attacks).
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was chris vickery, , wiz, , gitguardian (detection/alerting), pypi (mitigation), , reversinglabs (discovery and analysis), , cloudflare, health-isac, , microsoft detection and response team (dart), microsoft threat intelligence center (mstic), managed security service providers (mssps), , legit security (researcher omer mayraz), hackerone (vulnerability disclosure), , exodus intelligence (vulnerability discovery), , google threat intelligence group (gtig), palo alto networks unit 42, trend micro zero day initiative (zdi), , expel (threat intelligence tracking), microsoft threat intelligence team, , Check Point (vulnerability research and disclosure), veracode threat research, , Expected collaboration between CISA, sector regulators, insurers, and private-sector partners for threat validation..
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Notifying impacted users and organizations, Removed Several Repositories, Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol, Secured the database, Password Reset, Disabled Ghost Accounts, Disable Preview PanesBlock Outbound SMB TrafficEnforce Macro Blocking, Upgrade to patched Git versionsAvoid using GitHub Desktop for macOS until patched, DMCA takedown noticesAccount suspensions, shut down exfiltration serverreverted malicious commitsread-only mode for compromised project, Patch deployed by Microsoft on July 17, 2025Deprecation and retirement of Azure AD Graph API (effective August 31, 2025)Migration guidance to Microsoft Graph for affected applications, Seizure of 338 RaccoonO365 websitesCloudflare takedown of domains/Worker accountsInterstitial 'phish warning' pagesTermination of Workers scriptsSuspension of user accounts, Isolate Compromised Accounts/DevicesDisable External Access (Federation, Guest Users)Revoke Suspicious OAuth TokensBlock Malicious IPs/Domains (Defender for Office 365)Quarantine Phishing Emails/Teams Messages, Disabled image rendering in Copilot Chat (2024-08-14)Blocked Camo image-proxy exfiltration route, Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patches cannot be applied, October 2025 security updates (patch release), Emergency Patch (Microsoft)Network Segmentation (recommended)Disabling Internet-Facing WSUS Instances, Microsoft revoked malicious certificatesAV vendors updating detection signatures, Patches released in August 2024 (CVE-2024-38197)Subsequent patches in September 2024 and October 2025, npm package removal ('@acitons/artifact')removal of two GitHub user accounts linked to malwareblocking 12 versions of related package '8jfiesaf83', Mitigation of UDP Flood TrafficTraceback and Enforcement by ISPsRedaction/Hiding of Malicious Domains in Cloudflare Rankings, Azure DDoS Protection infrastructure filteringTraffic redirection and Zero-Trust Architectures (extended to AI agents)Continuous Context-Aware Verification (for identity sprawl)Mandatory MFA Enforcement (cloud providers)Network Segmentation (critical infrastructure).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Windows 10 internal builds, Plain Text Passwords, Secrets, Docker Credentials, Active Directory Snapshots, Documentation, Personal data, Potential sensitive data exfiltration (if exploited), Source code and secrets, secrets, Sensitive information in Integration Runtimes, Names, Phone Numbers, Internal Microsoft Teams communications, Payment Information (in some extortion cases), API Keys, Group and role details, Credentials, Email accounts, sensitive information, GitHub authentication tokens, Security Tokens, potential downstream repository access, Unpublished Zero-Day Vulnerability Descriptions, persistent system access, Install Action Tokens, Private keys, Job listing data, User Data, User information (Entra ID), other personal data, OneDrive/SharePoint Files, Private Repository Data, High risk of PII, corporate data, and AI training datasets exposure due to identity sprawl and SaaS attacks., Source Code Repositories, Company Name, Email Addresses, API keys, tokens, credentials, PII (via phishing/exfiltration), AWS Credentials, Files linked to business, IP addresses, social security numbers, potentially millions of records (exact number undisclosed), User Credentials (Entra ID tokens, passwords), Full control over resources and data, npm Credentials, SL2000 certificates, Microsoft 365 usernames, Corporate Chat/Message History, SL3000 certificates, sensitive organizational and personal data, Email Content, passwords, Personal and potentially sensitive information, Tenant settings, support case details, Microsoft Shared Source Kit, Passwords, BitLocker keys, Emails, Azure resource access (via Global Admin impersonation), Application permissions, Device information, Source code for Cortana, Source code for Bing, credit card numbers, email addresses, Private Source Code, System Information (e.g., whoami, net user /domain and ipconfig /all).
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 70.6K.
Ransomware Information
What was the highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident ?
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was Undisclosed (some victims likely paid).
Regulatory Compliance
What was the highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation ?
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was Potential (none publicly disclosed yet), Projected for non-compliance (details TBD by CISA/sector regulators)..
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Lawsuit by Microsoft/Health-ISAC, Restraining order (US jurisdiction only), , Possible (e.g., class-action lawsuits for data breaches), Potential lawsuits from stakeholders affected by mandate failures..
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Optional MFA and shared responsibility models in cloud security are no longer sufficient.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Block outbound SMB traffic (TCP 445) to untrusted networks, Educate employees on tax-themed and other targeted phishing campaigns., Implement stricter token validation for service-to-service (S2S) interactions, especially in multi-tenant environments., Educate system administrators on the risks of TOCTOU vulnerabilities in file operations., Implement behavioral detection for anomalous AI-assisted actions (e.g., unusual file access patterns)., Coordinate between security teams and database administrators for timely updates, Hold vendors accountable for incomplete patches that fail to fully address vulnerabilities., Law enforcement and tech companies should prioritize disruption of phishing-as-a-service operations., Monitor for suspicious file creation activities in system directories (e.g., C:\Windows\System32)., Restrict access to GitHub Actions environment variables (least privilege)., Conduct regular red-team exercises to test for cross-tenant impersonation and privilege escalation scenarios., Enforce macro blocking through Group Policy, Expand ISP-level enforcement to disrupt botnet command-and-control (C2) infrastructure., Review and audit applications with high-privileged access (HPA) to Entra ID and Azure resources., Apply Microsoft’s security updates for CVE-2025-59230 immediately., Invest in public-private threat intelligence sharing and cyber-resilience mandates., Monitor dark web/leak sites for signs of exfiltrated data., Implement zero-trust architectures for AI agents and non-human identities., Secure IoT devices with strong credentials, firmware updates, and network segmentation., Address the talent pipeline gap by restructuring entry-level cybersecurity roles., Enhance logging for legacy APIs to detect anomalous cross-tenant access attempts., Follow CISA’s BOD 22-01 guidance for comprehensive vulnerability management., Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual network activity from preview-related processes, Prioritize patching for systems with cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) and configured sync root directories., Disable preview panes in Windows Explorer and Quick Look on macOS, Implement additional authentication for high-stakes actions (e.g., multi-factor approval for data sharing)., Audit and restrict WSUS server exposure to the internet., Educate developers on secure secret management (e.g., use of vaults)., Treat compliance as a catalyst for innovation in data/AI governance., Enforce mandatory MFA across all cloud environments., Timely updates and patches to software, Monitor for credential stuffing and anomalous login attempts, especially from high-risk geolocations., Implement least-privilege principles to limit the impact of potential privilege escalation attacks., Apply Microsoft Teams patches promptly, especially for CVE-2024-38197., Implement stricter file and folder access controls, Apply Microsoft's October 2025 security updates immediately to all Windows systems., Healthcare and other high-risk sectors should participate in threat-sharing initiatives (e.g., ISACs)., Consolidate IAM systems and eliminate over-permissioned roles., Implement certificate transparency monitoring to detect abuse of code-signing certificates., Monitor for unusual Global Administrator activity, such as unexpected permission grants or account creations., Regularly update and patch systems to mitigate post-exploitation vulnerabilities., Segment networks to limit lateral movement post-infection., Restrict workflow permissions in GitHub Actions to least privilege., Accelerate migration from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph before the August 31, 2025 deadline., Prioritize patching affected SQL Server instances during scheduled maintenance windows, Organizations should enforce advanced MFA solutions resistant to phishing (e.g., FIDO2, hardware tokens)., Organizations should educate employees on verifying download sources and avoiding search engine ads for software., Prepare for 2026 mandates by aligning with CMMC, CIRCIA, and FISMA frameworks., Monitor for botnet activity (e.g., Aisuru/TurboMirai) in residential ISP traffic., Implement domain/URL filtering to block known phishing infrastructure., Monitor SQL Server logs for suspicious query patterns and privilege escalation attempts, Prepare for attacks exceeding 20 Tbps as baseline capacities grow., Monitor networks for signs of privilege escalation or lateral movement., Developers should use code-signing, checksum verification, or trusted sources for tools., Educate users on verifying sender identities and message authenticity (e.g., out-of-band confirmation for sensitive requests)., Enable GitHub’s dependency review for Actions workflows., Deploy behavioral-based detection (e.g., EDR/XDR) to catch obfuscated malware like OysterLoader., Adopt zero-trust principles for cloud identity systems, including least-privilege access and continuous validation., Implement package allowlists for CI/CD dependencies., Enhance transparency in public rankings (e.g., Cloudflare’s Top Domains) to account for malicious traffic distortion., Treat this vulnerability with urgency in systems handling sensitive or critical data, Scan repositories for exposed secrets using tools like GitGuardian or TruffleHog., Adopt continuous, context-aware authentication to counter synthetic social engineering., Apply Microsoft's emergency patch immediately., Use tools like Veracode Package Firewall to block malicious packages., Disable unnecessary features (e.g., image rendering) in AI tools handling sensitive data., Segment networks to limit lateral movement from compromised WSUS servers., Enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for maintainer accounts., Monitor and secure firmware update servers to prevent supply-chain-style compromises., Strengthen IoT device security (e.g., router/camera firmware updates, default credential changes)., Organizations should monitor for indicators of compromise (IoCs) linked to Banana Squad’s repositories., Implement multi-layered DDoS protection (e.g., cloud scrubbing, rate limiting)., Monitor for unusual message edits or notification behaviors in Teams., Scan build environments for unauthorized network egress (exfiltration)., Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, audit .gitmodules file contents before cloning untrusted repositories., Monitor for unusual npm package installations (e.g., typosquatted names)., Isolate or discontinue use of affected systems if patching is not feasible., Implement rate-limiting and anomaly detection for UDP traffic to mitigate volumetric DDoS attacks., Monitor for unusual CI/CD pipeline modifications., Fortify critical infrastructure with network segmentation and resilience metrics., Educate developers on verifying package names during installation., Assume collaboration tools are high-value targets and layer defenses (e.g., behavioral analysis, anomaly detection)., Use multi-factor authentication (MFA) for high-risk actions like software installation., Leverage insurer/investor incentives to reward verified cyber hygiene., GitHub should enhance repository vetting for suspicious patterns (e.g., trojanized forks of legitimate tools)., Conduct security reviews of cloud sync integrations to identify similar validation gaps., Educate developers on risks of AI prompt injection and social engineering via hidden content., Review and implement principle-of-least-privilege policies for database access, Implement runtime analysis for Python scripts to detect hidden backdoor logic., Audit AI tool permissions to limit access to sensitive data., Sanitize all inputs (including 'invisible' content like markdown comments) before processing by AI assistants., Prioritize patching for internet-facing systems and those accessible via phishing vectors., Monitor for signs of exploitation (e.g., PowerShell commands and exfiltration to Webhook.site)..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Microsoft Learn: 'Secure Microsoft Teams', Omada - Benoit Grange (CPTO), Microsoft Security Advisory (CVE-2025-59287), Microsoft Security Blog: 'Defending against attacks that abuse Microsoft Teams', Microsoft Security Advisory (CVE-2025-59499), Inmar Intelligence - Srini Varadarajan (CTO), DataDog researchers, Expel GitHub Indicators, Dirk-jan Mollema (Researcher Blog), Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative (ZDI), Mitiga Research (Roei Sherman), Microsoft Deprecation Notice for Azure AD Graph API, BleepingComputer, Tom's Hardware, Qi'anxin XLab Research, Netscout Threat Intelligence, Microsoft Security Update (October 2025), Cybersecurity Dive, Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, Veracode Threat Research, OWASP Top 10 2025 (Supply Chain Attacks), Kaseya - Mike Puglia (GM, Security), TechRadar Pro, Microsoft Security Advisory (September 2024), SOCRadar, Google Threat Intelligence Group (GTIG), Microsoft Defender XDR Hunting Queries for Teams Threats, Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC), The Hacker News, Microsoft Security Update Guide, GBHackers (GBH), CSO Online, ReversingLabs Blog Post, CISA Binding Operational Directive 22-01, Check Point Research Report, GitGuardian Report, Microsoft Threat Intelligence (X/Twitter), Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, Dashlane - Frédéric Rivain (CTO), IANS Research/Bedrock Data - George Gerchow (CSO), TorrentFreak, Trend Micro: 'DarkGate Malware Distributed via TeamsPhisher', The Register (Article), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), Microsoft Azure Security Blog, Microsoft, Microsoft Azure Blog, Security Researcher Matt Muir, IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report, CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit Blog (Steven Masada), Sophos: '3AM Ransomware Uses Storm-1811 Tactics', Lastwall - Karl Holmqvist (Founder/CEO), Legit Security Disclosure (HackerOne), Cloudflare Blog, SecurityScorecard - Michael Centralla (Head of Public Policy), Cloudflare 2025 Q1 DDoS Report, Wiz, Hunters: 'VEILdrive Campaign by Sangria Tempest', The Register, Microsoft Security Update Guide (CVE-2025-55680), Brian Krebs (Infosec Journalist), Expel Blog, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence: Storm-1811 Campaign, CYFIRMA and Exodus Intelligence (Vulnerability Discovery).
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.bleepingcomputer.com, https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-55241, https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-entra-azure-ad-blog/azure-ad-graph-retirement-august-31-2025/ba-p/4123456, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/07/01/defending-against-attacks-that-abuse-microsoft-teams/, https://threatintelligence.microsoft.com/, https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research/25/d/darkgate-malware-distributed-via-teamphisher.html, https://news.sophos.com/en-us/2024/05/01/3am-ransomware-storm-1811-tactics/, https://www.hunters.ai/blog/veildrive-sangria-tempest, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/security-teams-overview, https://github.com/microsoft/Microsoft-Defender-XDR-Hunting-Queries, https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/14/github_copilot_chat_vulnerability/, https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog, https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59230, https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/binding-operational-directives/bod-22-01, https://www.theregister.com, https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-59287, https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog, https://www.zerodayinitiative.com, https://www.theregister.com/2024/10/18/rhysida_ransomware_malvertising/, https://expel.com/blog/rhysida-malvertising-campaign/, https://x.com/MsftSecIntel/status/[redacted], https://github.com/expel-io/[redacted], https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/tag/ddos-protection/, https://www.cybersecuritydive.com/news/microsoft-azure-ddos-attack-aisuru-botnet/698765/, https://www.netscout.com/threat-intelligence, https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach, https://securityscorecard.com, https://www.dashlane.com, https://www.omadaidentity.com, https://www.inmar.com, https://lastwall.com, https://www.iansresearch.com .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is No evidence of misuse or malicious activity reported.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was GitHub repository owners, open-source project maintainers, Microsoft urged customers to migrate from Azure AD Graph API to Microsoft Graph by August 31, 2025., Applications with extended access to Azure AD Graph API were warned of impending API retirement in early September 2025., Microsoft customers advised to reset compromised credentials and enable advanced MFA., Healthcare organizations warned of targeted phishing risks., Microsoft has issued guidance to customers via the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) and Defender Threat Intelligence., Enterprise admins are advised to review Teams configurations and apply mitigations outlined in the Microsoft Security Blog., Partners (e.g., MSSPs) should prioritize Teams-specific detections in their SOC operations., CISA KEV catalog update, Public warnings via media outlets, Microsoft recommends immediate patching for all affected systems., Microsoft (limited updates), CISA (KEV catalog inclusion), Threat intelligence community (GTIG, Unit 42, ZDI), Microsoft revoked malicious certificates and issued a public advisory., Expel published technical details and indicators of compromise (IoCs)., Microsoft and Check Point issued advisories warning about the risks and urging patching., Developers advised to audit GitHub Actions dependencies for '@acitons/artifact', Microsoft Azure Customers, Cloudflare Customers, IoT Device Manufacturers (T-Mobile, Zyxel, D-Link, Linksys, TotoLink), Microsoft advised customers to enable Azure DDoS Protection for defense-in-depth., Organizations advised to prepare for 2026 mandates by: (1) auditing AI agent access, (2) consolidating IAM, (3) implementing zero-trust, and (4) participating in public-private resilience programs., .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an GitHub issued guidance on securing Actions workflows, No customer action required for the vulnerability patch.Customers advised to review and update applications relying on deprecated Azure AD Graph API., Users urged to report suspicious emails and enable security defaults in Microsoft 365., Users should report suspicious Teams activity (e.g., unexpected calls, file shares) via their organization’s security team.Microsoft 365 admins can access the 'Teams Security Guide' in the Microsoft 365 admin center for configuration recommendations.Customers with Defender XDR can run the provided hunting queries to check for indicators of compromise (IoCs)., GitHub Security Advisory (2024-08-14), Organizations urged to patch immediately; federal agencies given deadline of November 4, 2025, Users of Windows cloud synchronization services (e.g., OneDrive) should apply the October 2025 updates to mitigate the risk of privilege escalation., Apply emergency patchRestrict WSUS internet exposureMonitor for exploitation signs, Users advised to download Microsoft Teams only from official sources (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-teams/download-app).Organizations warned to monitor for OysterLoader/Latrodectus infections., Users advised to update Teams and exercise caution with unexpected messages or calls., Organizations running SQL Server in production environments advised to patch urgentlySecurity teams and database administrators urged to coordinate patch deployment, Veracode customers received automated protection via Package Firewall, Users of affected IoT devices advised to update firmware and change default credentials.Azure/Cloudflare customers informed of mitigated attacks and ongoing monitoring., No action required; Azure services remained operational., Customers of SaaS/cloud providers should: (1) demand transparency on AI agent security, (2) verify MFA enforcement and and (3) monitor for cascading outages in concentrated infrastructure.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an Crafted links, Weak Passwords, Malicious Extensions, Malicious repositories, Malicious Document, Legacy Azure AD Graph API (graph.windows.net) via flawed S2S actor token validation, Hidden markdown comments in GitHub pull requests/issues, Stolen OAuth Tokens, Azure Data Factory service certificate, Ghost Accounts, npm package installation ('@acitons/artifact'), compromised maintainer account (FastUUID project) and Microsoft Exchange Server.
What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was Weeks to months (e.g., Void Blizzard’s Entra ID enumeration before attack), Post-exploitation (e.g., whoami, net user, ipconfig commands), ongoing since June 2024 (second wave)previous campaign: May–September 2024, Prolonged (AI agents enable persistent, low-visibility reconnaissance)..
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Vulnerability in Azure Data Factory service certificate, Vulnerability in MSDT, Unintentional Misconfiguration, Weak Passwords, Lack of authentication and write-protection, Improper data management practices, Exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software, CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability, Trust in Popular Repositories, Insufficient data filtering in AI screenshot feature, Gaps in Microsoft's review system, Exploitation of passive file preview and indexing behaviors in modern operating systems, Mismatch in Git’s handling of configuration values and control characters, Weak authentication for maintainer accounts (lack of MFA).Insufficient validation of GitHub Actions workflows.Exposed secrets in repositories (lack of secret scanning)., Lack of repository integrity checks on GitHub for malicious forks.Trust in open-source hacking tools without verification.Exploitation of GitHub’s legitimacy to distribute malware., Inadequate tenant validation in Azure AD Graph API for S2S actor tokens.Over-reliance on deprecated legacy APIs without enforced migration timelines.Lack of API-level logging for the Graph API, enabling stealthy exploitation.Conditional Access policies applied to tokens that could be manipulated cross-tenant., Proliferation of phishing-as-a-service models lowering entry barriers for cybercriminals.Effectiveness of MFA bypass techniques in phishing kits.Lack of global law enforcement coordination to apprehend threat actors in jurisdictions like Nigeria.Delayed detection of phishing infrastructure (operational since at least July 2024)., Over-Permissive External Access: Default configurations allowed unauthorized tenant federation and guest access.Lack of Teams-Specific Monitoring: Security tools focused on email/endpoints missed Teams-based attacks (e.g., Adaptive Card phishing).Insufficient Identity Protections: Legacy authentication, weak MFA, and standing privileges enabled credential theft.User Awareness Gaps: Employees trusted Teams messages/calls more than emails, falling for social engineering.Open-Source Tool Abuse: Attackers leveraged public frameworks (e.g., TeamFiltration) to automate reconnaissance and exfiltration.Hybrid Complexity: On-premises AD sync with Entra ID created seams for lateral movement (e.g., Peach Sandstorm’s AD snapshots).Delayed Patching: Unpatched Teams clients or endpoints allowed malware execution (e.g., DarkGate via TeamsPhisher).Third-Party Risk: Compromised partner tenants or spoofed apps provided initial access vectors., Copilot Chat's over-permissive access to repository content (inherited from user permissions).Lack of input sanitization for 'invisible' markdown comments.Camo image-proxy service repurposed as a covert exfiltration channel.AI tool design assuming trust in contextual inputs without human-visible cues., Improper access control in Windows Remote Access Connection Manager (CVE-2025-59230), Inadequate filename validation in the HsmpOpCreatePlaceholders() function during placeholder file creation.Race condition (TOCTOU) between filename validation and actual file creation in the Windows Cloud Minifilter driver (cldflt.sys).Multi-threaded attack surface enabled by the CfCreatePlaceholders() API and I/O control code 0x903BC.Incomplete fix for a prior vulnerability (CVE-2020-17136) reintroduced the race condition., Insecure deserialization in WSUS (CVE-2025-59287)Incomplete initial patch by MicrosoftInternet-facing WSUS instances (against best practices), Over-reliance on search engine ads as a trusted software distribution channel.Delayed detection of obfuscated malware by traditional AV solutions.Abuse of legitimate code-signing certificates to bypass security controls.Lack of user awareness about typosquatting and fake download pages., Insufficient validation of message edits and sender identity changes in Teams.Lack of tamper-evident indicators (e.g., 'Edited' label bypass).Over-reliance on visual trust cues (e.g., display names) without cryptographic verification.Collaboration features (e.g., guest access, external sharing) expanding the attack surface., Improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands (CWE-89)Improper input validation in SQL Server query processing engine, Lack of package name validation during npm install.Over-permissive GitHub Actions environment variables.Insufficient scanning of post-install hooks in npm packages.Developer reliance on automated dependency installation without verification., Proliferation of insecure IoT devices with default/exploitable credentials.Lack of segmentation or monitoring for firmware update servers (e.g., TotoLink).Effectiveness of UDP floods with minimal spoofing in evading traditional defenses.Abuse of DNS query volumes to manipulate public rankings., Exploitation of default/weak credentials in IoT devices.Lack of firmware updates in residential routers/cameras.Botnet proliferation (Aisuru/TurboMirai) leveraging unsecured devices., Over-Reliance on Concentrated Infrastructure (single points of failure)Lack of Non-Human Identity Governance (AI agents, IAM sprawl)Static Authentication in the Age of DeepfakesVoluntary Compliance Frameworks (pre-2026 mandates)Talent Pipeline Collapse (AI replacing entry-level roles)Shared Responsibility Model Gaps in Cloud Security.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Mitigated the security flaw, Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol, Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture, Patch released, Disable Ghost Accounts, Continuous Detection and Removal, Disable Preview PanesBlock Outbound SMB TrafficEnforce Macro BlockingDeploy Behavioral Monitoring, Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone –recursive executions, audit repository contents before cloning, GitHub enhanced workflow security controls.GitGuardian expanded monitoring for similar attacks.Affected projects rotated compromised credentials., Server-side patch to enforce tenant validation in token processing.Accelerated deprecation of Azure AD Graph API (retired August 31, 2025).Enhanced guidance for migrating to Microsoft Graph.Internal review of high-privileged access (HPA) scenarios in Entra ID., Microsoft's legal action and infrastructure takedowns to disrupt RaccoonO365 operations.Cloudflare's ban on identified domains and termination of malicious scripts.Enhanced monitoring for AI-powered phishing (e.g., RaccoonO365 AI-MailCheck).Public-private collaboration to share indicators of compromise (IOCs) and tactics., action: Implement Zero Trust for Teams, details: Enforce least-privilege access, verify every request (user/device), and assume breach. Use Entra ID Conditional Access to restrict Teams access by location, device state, and risk level., action: Harden Teams Configurations, details: Disable external access by default; require admin approval for guest users; audit Teams apps for excessive permissions; block legacy auth protocols., action: Enhance Detection for Teams Threats, details: Enable all Teams-related Defender XDR alerts; create custom hunting queries for Teams API abuse, external file shares, and Adaptive Card phishing; integrate Teams logs with SIEM., action: Deploy Phishing-Resistant MFA, details: Replace SMS/email-based MFA with FIDO2 or certificate-based authentication for all users, especially admins. Monitor for MFA fatigue attacks (e.g., repeated push notifications)., action: Segment and Monitor Teams Traffic, details: Isolate Teams from high-value networks; inspect TLS traffic for C2 (e.g., BRc4 over Teams); block known malicious IPs/domains associated with Teams phishing., action: Conduct Teams-Specific Red Teaming, details: Simulate attack chains observed in the wild (e.g., TeamsPhisher + DarkGate, device code phishing) to test defenses and user awareness., action: Improve User Training, details: Add Teams-specific scenarios to security awareness programs (e.g., fake help desk calls, malicious file shares). Train users to verify unexpected Teams requests via a secondary channel., action: Automate Response to Teams Threats, details: Use Defender XDR automation to quarantine phishing messages, revoke compromised tokens, and isolate affected endpoints. Implement SOAR playbooks for common Teams attack patterns., action: Audit and Reduce Attack Surface, details: Remove unused Teams apps; disable unnecessary features (e.g., anonymous meeting joins); review federated tenant trust relationships; retire legacy authentication., action: Leverage Microsoft’s Built-In Protections, details: Enable all relevant Defender for Office 365, Defender for Identity, and Defender for Cloud Apps policies for Teams. Use Security Copilot to correlate Teams signals with broader threats., , Disabled image rendering in Copilot Chat.Blocked Camo-based exfiltration routes.Planned long-term fixes to restrict AI tool access and harden input validation., Patch managementNetwork segmentationPrivileged access monitoring, Microsoft released a patch in October 2025 to address the race condition in filename validation.Enhanced input validation for placeholder file operations in cloud sync services.Security hardening of the CfCreatePlaceholders() API and related I/O control codes., Emergency patch deploymentNetwork segmentation and exposure reductionEnhanced monitoring for reconnaissance activityVendor accountability for patch completeness, Search engines (e.g., Bing) should enhance ad verification for software downloads.Certificate authorities (CAs) must improve validation and revocation processes.Organizations should implement allow-listing for software installations.Security vendors need to prioritize behavioral detection for packed/obfuscated malware., Microsoft patched the vulnerabilities to prevent spoofing and impersonation.Added stricter validation for message edits and sender identity changes.Enhanced user education on social engineering risks in Teams.Ongoing monitoring for similar vulnerabilities in collaboration tools., Microsoft-issued patch for affected SQL Server versionsReinforced guidance on access control and monitoring best practices, npm removed malicious package and related versions.GitHub terminated associated user accounts.Veracode enhanced detection for obfuscated post-install scripts.Public advisory issued to raise awareness of typosquatting risks in CI/CD., Microsoft and Cloudflare enhanced DDoS mitigation capacities (e.g., 21.3M attacks blocked in 2024).Cloudflare modified ranking algorithms to exclude/hide malicious domains.Increased industry awareness of IoT botnet risks (e.g., Mirai-class threats).Potential ISP-level collaborations to disrupt Aisuru’s C2 infrastructure., Microsoft enhanced DDoS protection thresholds for Azure.Public awareness campaigns on IoT security (e.g., changing default passwords).Collaboration with ISPs to identify and remediate botnet-infected devices., Enforce 2026 Cyber-Resilience Mandates (CISA-led)Develop AI-Specific Zero-Trust FrameworksReplace Static MFA with Continuous VerificationDecentralize Critical Infrastructure Risk (reduce hyperscaler dependency)Invest in Cybersecurity Talent Pipelines (e.g., apprenticeships)Mandate Supply Chain Risk Assessments for Cloud/SaaS ProvidersLeverage Compliance as Innovation Driver (e.g., responsible AI use).
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description
Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description
Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description
The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=microsoft' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
