Comparison Overview

Intel Corporation

VS

Lam Research

Intel Corporation

Robert Noyce Building, None, Santa Clara, California, US, 95052
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Our mission is to shape the future of technology to help create a better future for the entire world, that’s the power of Intel Inside. With more ingenuity and creativity inside, our work is at the heart of countless innovations. From major breakthroughs to things that make everyday life better— they’re all powered by Intel technology. With a career at Intel, you can help make the future more wonderful for everyone.

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Lam Research

4650 Cushing Parkway, Fremont, CA, 94538, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849

Lam Research Corp. (NASDAQ:LRCX) At Lam Research, we create equipment that drives technological advancements in the semiconductor industry. Our innovative solutions enable chipmakers to power progress in nearly all aspects of modern life, and it takes each member of our team to make it possible. Across our organization, our employees come to work and change the world. We take on the toughest challenges with precision and accuracy. We push for the next big semiconductor breakthrough. We lead the way in one of the most critical and fast-moving industries on the planet. And we do it together, with deep connections and limitless collaboration. We take on the toughest challenges with precision and accuracy. We push for the next big semiconductor breakthrough. We lead the way in one of the most critical and fast-moving industries on the planet. And we do it together, with deep connections and limitless collaboration. The impact we have on the world is made possible by focusing on our people. We recognize and celebrate our teams’ achievements. We strive to create an inclusive and diverse culture where everyone’s contribution and voice has value. We evaluate and evolve our offerings, so our people receive the support and empowerment to do meaningful things for their lives, careers, and communities. Because at Lam, we believe that when people are the priority and they’re inspired to unleash the power of innovation for a better world together, anything is possible. Ready to help define the future of technology? Join us: www.lamresearch.com/careers

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 14,671
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intel-corporation.jpeg
Intel Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lam-research.jpeg
Lam Research
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Intel Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lam Research
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Intel Corporation has 12.36% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lam Research in 2025.

Incident History — Intel Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intel Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lam Research (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lam Research cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intel-corporation.jpeg
Intel Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Local Privilege Escalation, Cross-Tenant Data Theft in Cloud Environments, Memory Cache Exploitation
Motivation: Data Theft, Espionage, Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Information
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Client-side Authentication Bypass (JavaScript modification), Hardcoded Credentials (weak AES encryption: key '1234567890123456'), Lack of Server-Side Validation, Unauthenticated API Issuing Valid Access Tokens, Fabricated Authorization Token ('Not Autorized' typo bypass), API Response Manipulation for Administrative Access
Motivation: Research, Responsible Disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Authentication Bypass, Hardcoded Credentials, Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR)
Motivation: Research/Disclosure (Ethical)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lam-research.jpeg
Lam Research
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lam Research company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Intel Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Intel Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lam Research company has not reported any.

In the current year, Intel Corporation company has reported more cyber incidents than Lam Research company.

Intel Corporation company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Lam Research company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Intel Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Lam Research company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lam Research company nor Intel Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Intel Corporation company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Lam Research company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Intel Corporation nor Lam Research holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Intel Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lam Research company.

Lam Research company employs more people globally than Intel Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Neither Intel Corporation nor Lam Research holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Intel Corporation nor Lam Research holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Intel Corporation nor Lam Research holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Intel Corporation nor Lam Research holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Intel Corporation nor Lam Research holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Intel Corporation nor Lam Research holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N