Comparison Overview

Siemens

VS

KUKA

Siemens

Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 1, None, Munich, None, DE, 80333
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Siemens AG (Berlin and Munich) is a leading technology company focused on industry, infrastructure, mobility, and healthcare. The company’s purpose is to create technology to transform the everyday, for everyone. By combining the real and the digital worlds, Siemens empowers customers to accelerate their digital and sustainability transformations, making factories more efficient, cities more livable, and transportation more sustainable. Siemens also owns a majority stake in the publicly listed company Siemens Healthineers, a leading global medical technology provider pioneering breakthroughs in healthcare. For everyone. Everywhere. Sustainably. In fiscal 2024, which ended on September 30, 2024, the Siemens Group generated revenue of €75.9 billion and net income of €9.0 billion. As of September 30, 2024, the company employed around 312,000 people worldwide on the basis of continuing operations.

NAICS: 33325
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 242,813
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

KUKA

Zugspitzstr. 140, Augsburg, 86165, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

KUKA SE & Co. KGaA is a global leader in intelligent automation solutions, generating around 3.7 billion euro in sales and employing approximately 15,000 people worldwide. Headquartered in Augsburg, Germany, KUKA’s mission is to make automation accessible for everyone - simple, intuitive and sustainable. With a strong focus on digital transformation, human-robot collaboration, and AI-driven solutions, KUKA provides everything from robots and cells to fully automated systems and their connectivity. Our solutions serve key industries such as as automotive with a focus on e-mobility & battery, electronics, metal & plastic, consumer goods, food, e-commerce, retail, and healthcare. In addition, KUKA is committed to sustainable technologies and circular processes, combining ecological responsibility with efficiency.

NAICS: 33325
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,625
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siemens.jpeg
Siemens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kukaglobal.jpeg
KUKA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Siemens
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KUKA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Siemens in 2025.

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KUKA in 2025.

Incident History — Siemens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Siemens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KUKA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KUKA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siemens.jpeg
Siemens
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unlocked bootloader
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kukaglobal.jpeg
KUKA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Siemens company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KUKA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Siemens company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas KUKA company has not reported any.

In the current year, KUKA company and Siemens company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KUKA company nor Siemens company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KUKA company nor Siemens company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KUKA company nor Siemens company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Siemens company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while KUKA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Siemens nor KUKA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Siemens company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KUKA company.

Siemens company employs more people globally than KUKA company, reflecting its scale as a Automation Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Siemens nor KUKA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Siemens nor KUKA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Siemens nor KUKA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Siemens nor KUKA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Siemens nor KUKA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Siemens nor KUKA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N