Comparison Overview

AppLovin

VS

Juniper Networks

AppLovin

1100 Page Mill Rd, Palo Alto, California, 94304, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

AppLovin makes technologies that help businesses of every size connect to their ideal customers. The company provides end-to-end software and AI solutions for businesses to reach, monetize and grow their global audiences. AppLovin is headquartered in Palo Alto, California, with several offices globally.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 783
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Juniper Networks

1133 Innovation Way, Sunnyvale, CA, US, 94089
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 700 and 749

Juniper Networks is leading the revolution in networking, making it one of the most exciting technology companies in Silicon Valley today. Since being founded by Pradeep Sindhu, Dennis Ferguson, and Bjorn Liencres nearly 20 years ago, Juniper’s sole mission has been to create innovative products and solutions that meet the growing demands of the connected world. Juniper Networks is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, with over 9,000 employees in 50 countries and nearly $5 billion in revenue. Our customers include the top 100 global service providers and 30,000 enterprises, including the Global Fortune 100 as well as hundreds of federal, state and local government agencies and higher educational organizations. At Juniper Networks, we believe the network is the single greatest vehicle for knowledge, understanding, and human advancement that the world has ever known. Now more than ever, the world needs network innovation to connect ideas and unleash our full potential. Juniper is taking a new approach to the network — one that is intelligent, agile, secure and open to any vendor and any network environment. To learn more about Juniper, our products, and our vision for the decade ahead, visit our site at https://www.juniper.net. Acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise in 2025.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10,776
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applovin.jpeg
AppLovin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/juniper-networks.jpeg
Juniper Networks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AppLovin
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Juniper Networks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AppLovin in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Juniper Networks has 72.41% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — AppLovin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AppLovin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Juniper Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Juniper Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applovin.jpeg
AppLovin
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/juniper-networks.jpeg
Juniper Networks
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Custom Backdoors
Motivation: Long-term persistence and stealth
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Default Passwords
Motivation: Conduct DDoS Attacks
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Custom Backdoors
Motivation: Espionage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

AppLovin company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Juniper Networks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Juniper Networks company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas AppLovin company has not reported any.

In the current year, Juniper Networks company has reported more cyber incidents than AppLovin company.

Neither Juniper Networks company nor AppLovin company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Juniper Networks company has disclosed at least one data breach, while AppLovin company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Juniper Networks company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while AppLovin company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Juniper Networks company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while AppLovin company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AppLovin nor Juniper Networks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Juniper Networks company and AppLovin company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Juniper Networks company employs more people globally than AppLovin company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither AppLovin nor Juniper Networks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AppLovin nor Juniper Networks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AppLovin nor Juniper Networks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AppLovin nor Juniper Networks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AppLovin nor Juniper Networks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AppLovin nor Juniper Networks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N