Comparison Overview

Broadcom

VS

Infineon Technologies

Broadcom

3401 Hillview Ave, Palo Alto, California, US, 94304
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

A global infrastructure technology leader built on more than 60 years of innovation, collaboration and engineering excellence.

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 53,946
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Infineon Technologies

Am Campeon 1-12, Neubiberg, München, 85579, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849

Semiconductors are crucial to solve the energy challenges of our time and shape the digital transformation. This is why Infineon is committed to actively driving decarbonization and digitalization. As a global semiconductor leader in power systems and IoT, we enable game-changing solutions for green and efficient energy, clean and safe mobility, as well as smart and secure IoT. We make life easier, safer, and greener. Together with our customers and partners. For a better tomorrow. Together, with more than 58,000 people from over 100 countries, we are not just shaping the future. We are redefining it. We engineer innovative products, while caring for our people and empowering them to reach ambitious goals. We offer work-life balance, long term growth and a supportive environment where individuality is celebrated. #WeAreIn for driving decarbonization and digitalization. Are you in?

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 42,539
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/broadcom.jpeg
Broadcom
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infineon-technologies.jpeg
Infineon Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Broadcom
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Infineon Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Broadcom has 124.72% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Infineon Technologies in 2025.

Incident History — Broadcom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Broadcom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Infineon Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infineon Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/broadcom.jpeg
Broadcom
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit (CVE-2025-61882, CVE-2025-21884), Unauthenticated HTTP Requests, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransomware Extortion)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite, arbitrary code execution, lateral movement, credential theft, data exfiltration
Motivation: financial gain (ransomware), data theft for extortion, disruption of high-value enterprise targets
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: third-party vendor (BSH, a regional partner of ADP)
Motivation: financial gain, data theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infineon-technologies.jpeg
Infineon Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Infineon Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Broadcom company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Broadcom company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Infineon Technologies company has not reported any.

In the current year, Broadcom company has reported more cyber incidents than Infineon Technologies company.

Broadcom company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Infineon Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Broadcom company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Infineon Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Infineon Technologies company nor Broadcom company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Broadcom company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Infineon Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Broadcom nor Infineon Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Broadcom company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Infineon Technologies company.

Broadcom company employs more people globally than Infineon Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Neither Broadcom nor Infineon Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Broadcom nor Infineon Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Broadcom nor Infineon Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Broadcom nor Infineon Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Broadcom nor Infineon Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Broadcom nor Infineon Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N