Comparison Overview

Berkshire Hathaway

VS

ICICI Lombard

Berkshire Hathaway

US
Last Update: 2025-12-04

None

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 6,832
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ICICI Lombard

ICICI Lombard House 414, P Balu Marg Near Siddhi Vinayak Temple, Prabhadevi , Mumbai , Maharashtra, 400025, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

About ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited ICICI Lombard is the leading private general insurance company in the country. The Company offers a comprehensive and well-diversified range of products through multiple distribution channels, including motor, health, crop, fire, personal accident, marine, engineering, and liability insurance. With a legacy of over 2 decades, ICICI Lombard is committed to customer centricity with its brand philosophy of ‘Nibhaaye Vaade’. The company has issued over 36.2 million policies, honoured over 2.9 million claims and has a Gross Written Premium (GWP) of ₹ 255.94 billion for the year ended March 31, 2024. ICICI Lombard has 312 branches and 13,670 employees, as on March 31, 2024. ICICI Lombard has been a pioneer in the industry and is the first large scale insurance company in India to migrate its entire core systems to cloud. With a strong focus on being digital led and agile, it has launched a plethora of tech-driven innovations, including the industry first Face Scan on its signature insurance and wellness App - IL TakeCare, with over 9 million downloads. The company has won several laurels including ET Corporate Excellence Awards, Golden Peacock Awards, FICCI Insurance Awards, Assocham, Stevie Asia Pacific, National CSR awards etc. for its various initiatives. For more details log on to www.icicilombard.com

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 13,539
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Berkshire Hathaway
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icici-lombard.jpeg
ICICI Lombard
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Berkshire Hathaway
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ICICI Lombard
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Berkshire Hathaway in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICICI Lombard in 2025.

Incident History — Berkshire Hathaway (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Berkshire Hathaway cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ICICI Lombard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICICI Lombard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Berkshire Hathaway
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icici-lombard.jpeg
ICICI Lombard
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Berkshire Hathaway company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ICICI Lombard company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ICICI Lombard company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Berkshire Hathaway company.

In the current year, ICICI Lombard company and Berkshire Hathaway company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ICICI Lombard company nor Berkshire Hathaway company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ICICI Lombard company nor Berkshire Hathaway company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ICICI Lombard company nor Berkshire Hathaway company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway company nor ICICI Lombard company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ICICI Lombard company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Berkshire Hathaway company.

ICICI Lombard company employs more people globally than Berkshire Hathaway company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Berkshire Hathaway nor ICICI Lombard holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N