Comparison Overview

Pinduoduo

VS

Fanatics

Pinduoduo

533 Loushanguan Rd, Arch Tower II, Changning District, 28th Fl, Shanghai, Shanghai, CN, None
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Pinduoduo is a mobile-only marketplace that connects millions of agricultural producers with consumers across China. Pinduoduo aims to bring more businesses and people into the digital economy so that local communities can benefit from the increased productivity and convenience through new market opportunities.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1,993
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fanatics

95 Morton St, None, New York, NY, US, 10014
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Fanatics is a leading global digital sports platform. We ignite the passions of global sports fans and maximize the presence and reach for our hundreds of sports partners globally by offering products and services across Fanatics Commerce, Fanatics Collectibles, and Fanatics Betting & Gaming, allowing sports fans to Buy, Collect, and Bet. Through the Fanatics platform, sports fans can buy licensed fan gear, jerseys, lifestyle and streetwear products, headwear, and hardgoods; collect physical and digital trading cards, sports memorabilia, and other digital assets; and bet as the company builds its Sportsbook and iGaming platform. Fanatics has an established database of over 100 million global sports fans; a global partner network with approximately 900 sports properties, including major national and international professional sports leagues, players associations, teams, colleges, college conferences and retail partners, 2,500 athletes and celebrities, and 200 exclusive athletes; and over 2,000 retail locations, including its Lids retail stores. Our more than 22,000 employees are committed to relentlessly enhancing the fan experience and delighting sports fans globally.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11,196
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinduoduoinc.jpeg
Pinduoduo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fanatics-inc-.jpeg
Fanatics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Pinduoduo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fanatics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pinduoduo in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fanatics in 2025.

Incident History — Pinduoduo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pinduoduo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fanatics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fanatics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pinduoduoinc.jpeg
Pinduoduo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fanatics-inc-.jpeg
Fanatics
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Pinduoduo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fanatics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fanatics company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Pinduoduo company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fanatics company and Pinduoduo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fanatics company nor Pinduoduo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Fanatics company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Pinduoduo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fanatics company nor Pinduoduo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Pinduoduo company nor Fanatics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Fanatics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fanatics company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Pinduoduo company.

Fanatics company employs more people globally than Pinduoduo company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Fanatics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Fanatics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Fanatics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Fanatics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Fanatics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Pinduoduo nor Fanatics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N