Comparison Overview

Korea Aerospace Industries

VS

Embraer

Korea Aerospace Industries

Gongdanro 1-ro, Sanam-myeon, , Sacheon, , KR
Last Update: 2025-12-04
Between 750 and 799

As a total solution provider in aerospace, KAI has been taking leading role in national aviation industry and security with successful development of KT-1 Basic Trainer, T-50 Advanced Jet trainer, FA-50 Light Combat Aircraft, KUH-1 Utility Helicopter and RQ-101 Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Currently KFX and LAH/LCH program which is future growth engine are under development. In addition, KAI is extending its scope to space business by participating the development such as Korea Multi-Purpose Satellites, Compact Advanced Satellite 500 and Defense Satellite, as well as Korea Space Launch Vehicle.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 672
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Embraer

Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170, São José dos Campos, SP, BR, 12227-901
Last Update: 2025-12-09

A global aerospace company headquartered in Brazil, Embraer has businesses in Commercial and Executive Aviation, Defense & Security, and Agricultural Aviation. The company designs, develops, manufactures and markets aircraft and systems, providing Services and Support to customer after-sales. Since it was founded in 1969, Embraer has delivered more than 8,000 aircraft. On average, about every 10 seconds an aircraft manufactured by Embraer takes off somewhere in the world, transporting over 145 million passengers a year.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 23,638
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/korea-aerospace-industries.jpeg
Korea Aerospace Industries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/embraer.jpeg
Embraer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Korea Aerospace Industries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Embraer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Korea Aerospace Industries in 2025.

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Embraer in 2025.

Incident History — Korea Aerospace Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Korea Aerospace Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Embraer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Embraer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/korea-aerospace-industries.jpeg
Korea Aerospace Industries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/embraer.jpeg
Embraer
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Embraer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Korea Aerospace Industries company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Embraer company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Korea Aerospace Industries company has not reported any.

In the current year, Embraer company and Korea Aerospace Industries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Embraer company nor Korea Aerospace Industries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Embraer company nor Korea Aerospace Industries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Embraer company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Korea Aerospace Industries company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Korea Aerospace Industries company nor Embraer company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Korea Aerospace Industries nor Embraer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Korea Aerospace Industries company nor Embraer company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Embraer company employs more people globally than Korea Aerospace Industries company, reflecting its scale as a Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing.

Neither Korea Aerospace Industries nor Embraer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Korea Aerospace Industries nor Embraer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Korea Aerospace Industries nor Embraer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Korea Aerospace Industries nor Embraer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Korea Aerospace Industries nor Embraer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Korea Aerospace Industries nor Embraer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N