Comparison Overview

The Walt Disney Company

VS

Electronic Arts (EA)

The Walt Disney Company

The Walt Disney Company, Burbank, CA, 91521, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The Walt Disney Company, together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, is a leading diversified international family entertainment and media enterprise that includes three core business segments: Disney Entertainment, ESPN, and Disney Experiences. Our mission is to entertain, inform and inspire people around the globe through the power of unparalleled storytelling, reflecting the iconic brands, creative minds and innovative technologies that make us the world’s premier entertainment company.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 177,769
Subsidiaries: 64
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
2

Electronic Arts (EA)

209 Redwood Shores Pkwy, Redwood City, CA, US, 94065
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849

Electronic Arts creates next-level entertainment experiences that inspire players and fans around the world. Here, everyone is part of the story. Part of a community that connects across the globe. A team where creativity thrives, new perspectives are invited, and ideas matter. Regardless of your role, team, or location, this is a place where everyone makes play happen. Join us.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 32,473
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-walt-disney-company.jpeg
The Walt Disney Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electronic-arts.jpeg
Electronic Arts (EA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Walt Disney Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Electronic Arts (EA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

The Walt Disney Company has 13.64% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electronic Arts (EA) in 2025.

Incident History — The Walt Disney Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Walt Disney Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Electronic Arts (EA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electronic Arts (EA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-walt-disney-company.jpeg
The Walt Disney Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing, Malware
Motivation: Data exfiltration, Financial gain, Public disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malicious AI tool installation
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electronic-arts.jpeg
Electronic Arts (EA)
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Theft (Authentication Cookies), Social Engineering, Internal Network Access via Slack
Motivation: Financial Gain (Extortion), Data Monetization (Failed Sale)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Electronic Arts (EA) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Walt Disney Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Walt Disney Company company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Electronic Arts (EA) company.

In the current year, The Walt Disney Company company has reported more cyber incidents than Electronic Arts (EA) company.

The Walt Disney Company company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Electronic Arts (EA) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Electronic Arts (EA) company and The Walt Disney Company company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Electronic Arts (EA) company nor The Walt Disney Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Walt Disney Company company nor Electronic Arts (EA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Walt Disney Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Electronic Arts (EA) company.

The Walt Disney Company company employs more people globally than Electronic Arts (EA) company, reflecting its scale as a Entertainment Providers.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N