Comparison Overview

Auckland Airport

VS

Delta Air Lines

Auckland Airport

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, NZ
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Over 50 years of welcoming the world to New Zealand. Auckland Airport is where we welcome visitors and farewell friends. It is where New Zealand touches the world. Over 70 per cent of visitors enter or leave New Zealand via Auckland Airport, which handles over 18.5 million passengers a year through 30 international airlines. Auckland Airport is a major driver of the New Zealand economy, generating billions of dollars, creating thousands of jobs, and making a vital contribution to New Zealand travel, trade and tourism by strengthening connections with the world. As New Zealand's major transport hub, Auckland Airport is investing in a traveller experience that all New Zealanders can be proud of. Auckland Airport is continually developing the capacity and services to ensure it will sustainably cope with an anticipated 40 million passengers a year by 2044, reflecting New Zealand’s growing popularity as one of the world’s leading tourism destinations.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 743
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Delta Air Lines

1030 Delta Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia, US, 30320-6001
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL) is the U.S. global airline leader in safety, innovation, reliability and customer experience. Powered by our employees around the world, Delta has for a decade led the airline industry in operational excellence while maintaining our reputation for award-winning customer service. With our mission of connecting the people and cultures of the globe, Delta strives to foster understanding across a diverse world and serve as a force for social good.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 77,842
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/auckland-international-airport-limited.jpeg
Auckland Airport
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delta-air-lines.jpeg
Delta Air Lines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Auckland Airport
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Delta Air Lines
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Auckland Airport in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

Delta Air Lines has 56.25% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Auckland Airport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Auckland Airport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Delta Air Lines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delta Air Lines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/auckland-international-airport-limited.jpeg
Auckland Airport
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delta-air-lines.jpeg
Delta Air Lines
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Auckland Airport company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Delta Air Lines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Delta Air Lines company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Auckland Airport company has not reported any.

In the current year, Delta Air Lines company has reported more cyber incidents than Auckland Airport company.

Neither Delta Air Lines company nor Auckland Airport company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Delta Air Lines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Auckland Airport company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Delta Air Lines company nor Auckland Airport company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Auckland Airport company nor Delta Air Lines company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Auckland Airport nor Delta Air Lines holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Delta Air Lines company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Auckland Airport company.

Delta Air Lines company employs more people globally than Auckland Airport company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Auckland Airport nor Delta Air Lines holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Auckland Airport nor Delta Air Lines holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Auckland Airport nor Delta Air Lines holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Auckland Airport nor Delta Air Lines holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Auckland Airport nor Delta Air Lines holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Auckland Airport nor Delta Air Lines holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N