Comparison Overview

Palantir Technologies

VS

Daraz

Palantir Technologies

1200 17th Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849

At Palantir, we're helping the world's most important institutions use their data to solve their most urgent problems. Our software lets our customers integrate and analyze all of their data so they can answer questions that they couldn't before. From delivering disaster relief to building safer automobiles, we're honored to help make our partners better at their most important work. Together with our customers, we're building the future of national security, healthcare, energy, finance, manufacturing, and more. And we need bright minds from around the world to help us.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 4,616
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Daraz

8 Shenton Way, Singapore, undefined, undefined, SG
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Daraz is the leading e-commerce marketplace across South Asia (excluding India). Our business covers four key areas – e-commerce, logistics, payment infrastructure and financial services – providing our sellers and customers with an end-to-end commerce solution. With access to over 500 million customers in our markets, we strive to deliver on our promise of enabling easy access to a wide assortment of products while bringing users on an interactive and personalised journey. We are driven by our commitment to uplifting local communities through the power of commerce. We invest in the development and education of our sellers, employees and communities with the goal of empowering them to grow and succeed. As we work towards our vision of becoming a champion of South Asia, we will continue to look for new ways to improve our offerings and connect with our people and communities. Visit https://www.daraz.com/ to learn more.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 12,213
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palantir-technologies.jpeg
Palantir Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daraz.jpeg
Daraz
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Palantir Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Daraz
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Palantir Technologies in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Daraz in 2025.

Incident History — Palantir Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Palantir Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Daraz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Daraz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/palantir-technologies.jpeg
Palantir Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daraz.jpeg
Daraz
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Palantir Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Daraz company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Daraz company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Palantir Technologies company.

In the current year, Daraz company and Palantir Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Daraz company nor Palantir Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Daraz company nor Palantir Technologies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Daraz company nor Palantir Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Palantir Technologies company nor Daraz company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Palantir Technologies nor Daraz holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Palantir Technologies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Daraz company.

Daraz company employs more people globally than Palantir Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Palantir Technologies nor Daraz holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Palantir Technologies nor Daraz holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Palantir Technologies nor Daraz holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Palantir Technologies nor Daraz holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Palantir Technologies nor Daraz holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Palantir Technologies nor Daraz holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N