Comparison Overview

The Walt Disney Company

VS

Cinemark

The Walt Disney Company

The Walt Disney Company, Burbank, CA, 91521, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The Walt Disney Company, together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, is a leading diversified international family entertainment and media enterprise that includes three core business segments: Disney Entertainment, ESPN, and Disney Experiences. Our mission is to entertain, inform and inspire people around the globe through the power of unparalleled storytelling, reflecting the iconic brands, creative minds and innovative technologies that make us the world’s premier entertainment company.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 177,769
Subsidiaries: 64
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
2

Cinemark

3900 Dallas Parkway, Plano, TX, 75093, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Headquartered in Plano, TX, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. provides premium out-of-home entertainment experiences as one of the largest and most influential theatrical exhibition companies in the world with 497 theatres and 5,653 screens in the U.S. and Latin America as of December 31, 2024. • Our circuit is the third largest in the U.S. with 304 theatres and 4,255 screens in 42 states. • We ranked either #1 or #2 in box office revenues in 21 of our top 25 markets. • We are one of the most geographically diverse circuits in Latin America with 193 theatres and 1,398 screens in 13 countries. • We had a presence in 15 of the top 20 metropolitan cities in South and Central America.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 11,258
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-walt-disney-company.jpeg
The Walt Disney Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cinemark.jpeg
Cinemark
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Walt Disney Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cinemark
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

The Walt Disney Company has 13.64% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cinemark in 2025.

Incident History — The Walt Disney Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Walt Disney Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cinemark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cinemark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-walt-disney-company.jpeg
The Walt Disney Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing, Malware
Motivation: Data exfiltration, Financial gain, Public disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malicious AI tool installation
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cinemark.jpeg
Cinemark
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cinemark company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Walt Disney Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

The Walt Disney Company company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cinemark company has not reported any.

In the current year, The Walt Disney Company company has reported more cyber incidents than Cinemark company.

The Walt Disney Company company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Cinemark company has not reported such incidents publicly.

The Walt Disney Company company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Cinemark company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cinemark company nor The Walt Disney Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Walt Disney Company company nor Cinemark company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Cinemark holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Walt Disney Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cinemark company.

The Walt Disney Company company employs more people globally than Cinemark company, reflecting its scale as a Entertainment Providers.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Cinemark holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Cinemark holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Cinemark holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Cinemark holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Cinemark holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Walt Disney Company nor Cinemark holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N