Comparison Overview

LATAM Airlines

VS

Cathay Pacific

LATAM Airlines

Avenida Presidente Riesco 5711, Edificio Huidobro, Las Condes, Región Metropolitana de Santiago, CL, 7561114
Last Update: 2025-12-09

We are the leading airline in South America with the largest destinations, frequencies and aircraft fleet offer. We have the largest network of domestic destinations in five South American markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru, and international operations in Latin America, Europe, the United States, Oceania and the Caribbean. Discover your next destination at latam.com Follow us on: Facebook: www.facebook.com/LATAMAirlines Twitter: www.twitter.com/LATAMAirlines YouTube: www.youtube.com/LATAMAirlines_EN Instagram: www.instagram.com/LATAMAirlines

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 41,715
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cathay Pacific

Cathay City, Chek Lap Kok, undefined, undefined, HK
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to the official Cathay Pacific LinkedIn page. We have over 200 destinations in our global network, but want to do more than just move you from A to B. We want to take you further in your journey, and ultimately, to move beyond. And we’re here to do what we can to help you discover what’s next. For flight and other inquiries, please contact us via WhatsApp (+852 2747 2747) and Facebook.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 13,834
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/latam_airlines.jpeg
LATAM Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cathay-pacific-airways.jpeg
Cathay Pacific
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LATAM Airlines
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cathay Pacific
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LATAM Airlines in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cathay Pacific in 2025.

Incident History — LATAM Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LATAM Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cathay Pacific (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cathay Pacific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/latam_airlines.jpeg
LATAM Airlines
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cathay-pacific-airways.jpeg
Cathay Pacific
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LATAM Airlines company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cathay Pacific company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cathay Pacific company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LATAM Airlines company.

In the current year, Cathay Pacific company and LATAM Airlines company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cathay Pacific company nor LATAM Airlines company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cathay Pacific company nor LATAM Airlines company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cathay Pacific company nor LATAM Airlines company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LATAM Airlines company nor Cathay Pacific company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LATAM Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cathay Pacific company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LATAM Airlines company.

LATAM Airlines company employs more people globally than Cathay Pacific company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither LATAM Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LATAM Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LATAM Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LATAM Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LATAM Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LATAM Airlines nor Cathay Pacific holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N