Comparison Overview

China Merchants Bank

VS

Bandhan Bank

China Merchants Bank

7088 Shennan Blvd., Shenzhen, 518040, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Established in 1987 in Shenzhen, the forefront of China’s reform and opening-up drive, China Merchants Bank ("CMB") has developed into the most influential commercial bank brand in China thanks to continuous financial innovation, quality customer service, prudent management and strong business performance. For many consecutive years, CMB has been ranked among China’s top commercial banks according to comprehensive assessment by CBRC. The bank has won a number of titles, including the Best Commercial Bank of China, the Best Retail Bank in China, the Best Private Bank in China, China’s Best Custody Specialist from the British Financial Times, Euromoney and The Asset. The Bank was shortlisted as a World-Class Chinese Brand and ranked No. 1 in the P/B list of the world’s top 50 banks with the largest market value by the British Financial Times. It was also listed No.60 among the world's Top 1,000 Banks by The Banker.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 13,155
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bandhan Bank

BN 5, Sector V, Salt Lake City Adventz Infinity@5 Kolkata, West Bengal 700091, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Started as a universal bank on August 23, 2015, Bandhan Bank is one of India’s fastest-growing private sector banks. Bandhan Bank has always been committed to financial inclusion and aims to serve the underserved. Guided by the principle of ‘Aapka Bhala, Sabki Bhalai,’ the Bank is dedicated not only to serving its customers but also to making a positive difference in people’s lives. They actively aim to bridge the gap for those who may not have had easy access to conventional banking services. Its focus is on providing a variety of world-class banking products and a comprehensive 360-degree service proposition, including loans, deposit accounts, internet and mobile banking, and ATM services, across India, primarily to semi-urban and rural customers. Presently, Bandhan Bank has nearly 6,300 banking outlets pan-India. The Bank has mobilised deposits of ₹1,41,002 crore and its total advances stand at ₹1,31,927 crore taking the total business to ₹2,72,929 crore as on December 31, 2024. The Bank has a team of 78,400 employees on roll. Bandhan Bank is driven by a constant desire to serve better.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-merchants-bank.jpeg
China Merchants Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bandhanbank.jpeg
Bandhan Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China Merchants Bank
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bandhan Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Merchants Bank in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bandhan Bank in 2025.

Incident History — China Merchants Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Merchants Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bandhan Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bandhan Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-merchants-bank.jpeg
China Merchants Bank
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bandhanbank.jpeg
Bandhan Bank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

China Merchants Bank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bandhan Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bandhan Bank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to China Merchants Bank company.

In the current year, Bandhan Bank company and China Merchants Bank company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bandhan Bank company nor China Merchants Bank company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bandhan Bank company nor China Merchants Bank company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bandhan Bank company nor China Merchants Bank company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither China Merchants Bank company nor Bandhan Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither China Merchants Bank nor Bandhan Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither China Merchants Bank company nor Bandhan Bank company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

China Merchants Bank company employs more people globally than Bandhan Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither China Merchants Bank nor Bandhan Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China Merchants Bank nor Bandhan Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China Merchants Bank nor Bandhan Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China Merchants Bank nor Bandhan Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China Merchants Bank nor Bandhan Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China Merchants Bank nor Bandhan Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N