Comparison Overview

Boeing

VS

AVIC International Holding Corporation

Boeing

929 Long Bridge Drive, Arlington, VA, US, 22202
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

As a leading global aerospace company, Boeing develops, manufactures and services commercial airplanes, defense products and space systems for customers in more than 150 countries. As a top U.S. exporter, the company leverages the talents of a global supplier base to advance economic opportunity, sustainability and community impact. Boeing’s diverse team is committed to innovating for the future, leading with sustainability, and cultivating a culture based on the company’s core values of safety, quality and integrity. Explore career opportunities: boeing.com/careers Boeing is an Equal Opportunity Employer. Employment decisions are made without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, age, physical or mental disability, genetic factors, military/veteran status or other characteristics protected by law.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 119,743
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

AVIC International Holding Corporation

AVIC International Plaza, No.18 Beichen East Road Beijing, Beijing 100101, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

AVIC International Holding Corporation (AVIC INTERNATIONAL) is a global diversified holding business group, under the control of Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC). Our business involves aviation, electronics, international business, modern services, etc. The corporation owns 8 domestic and foreign listed companies, and has established over 150 branches in more than 60 countries and regions. Our clients spread in over 180 countries and regions.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boeing.jpeg
Boeing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avic-international-holding-corporation.jpeg
AVIC International Holding Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Boeing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AVIC International Holding Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation & Aerospace Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boeing in 2025.

Incidents vs Aviation & Aerospace Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AVIC International Holding Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Boeing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boeing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AVIC International Holding Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AVIC International Holding Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boeing.jpeg
Boeing
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2018
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Human Error
Motivation: Accidental
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2017
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2017
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Accidental Email
Motivation: Accidental
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avic-international-holding-corporation.jpeg
AVIC International Holding Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Boeing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AVIC International Holding Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Boeing company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas AVIC International Holding Corporation company has not reported any.

In the current year, AVIC International Holding Corporation company and Boeing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Boeing company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while AVIC International Holding Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Boeing company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other AVIC International Holding Corporation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AVIC International Holding Corporation company nor Boeing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Boeing company nor AVIC International Holding Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Boeing nor AVIC International Holding Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Boeing company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AVIC International Holding Corporation company.

Boeing company employs more people globally than AVIC International Holding Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Aviation & Aerospace.

Neither Boeing nor AVIC International Holding Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Boeing nor AVIC International Holding Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Boeing nor AVIC International Holding Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Boeing nor AVIC International Holding Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Boeing nor AVIC International Holding Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Boeing nor AVIC International Holding Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N