Comparison Overview

International Airlines Group (IAG)

VS

avianca

International Airlines Group (IAG)

Speedbird Way, None, London, England, GB, UB7 0
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 700 and 749

International Airlines Group (IAG) is one of the world’s largest airline groups with 600+ aircraft carrying more than 122 million customers to 260 destinations across 91 countries each year. Formed in January 2011, IAG is the parent company of Aer Lingus, British Airways, Iberia, Vueling and LEVEL. It is a Spanish registered company with shares traded on the London Stock Exchange and Spanish Stock Exchanges. The corporate head office for IAG is in London, UK. IAG combines leading airlines in the UK, Ireland and Spain, enabling them to enhance their presence in the aviation market while retaining their individual brands and current operations. The airlines'​ customers benefit from a larger combined network for both passengers and cargo, and a greater ability to invest in new products and services through improved financial robustness.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 602
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

avianca

Avenida Calle 26 59-15, Bogotá, CO
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

!BIenvenido al sitio oficial! Avianca es la primera aerolínea comercial fundada en las Américas y la segunda en el mundo. Enfocados en alcanzar la excelencia y eficiencia operacional, se dio marcha a una profunda reorganización de los procesos, la cual ha estado acompañada de la modernización y renovación de la flota de aeronaves, la adopción de las mejores prácticas de la industria y el desarrollo de una intensa campaña por el mejoramiento de la cultura interna de servicio. Nos proponemos ahora fortalecer el posicionamiento de la compañía en los diversos mercados a través de la entrega de un servicio superior. Por eso, la trayectoria, el profesionalismo y la experiencia de varias generaciones de hombres y mujeres que por décadas le han dado vida a Avianca, TACA, AeroGal y Tampa Cargo, constituyen ahora nuestra inspiración para convertir la nueva Avianca en el aliado ideal para sus viajes. Avianca acepta los comentarios y quejas que se reciban por este medio pero no podrá dar respuesta a todas éstas. Para asegurar una respuesta adecuada a sus quejas o comentarios, por favor envíelas a Centro Administrativo Avianca - Relaciones con el Cliente, Avenida calle 26 No. 59-15 Bogotá, Colombia o ingréselas a través de http://www.avianca.com/PiedePagina/Contactenos/es/Sugerencias-Reclamos.htm Bogotá: (571)4013434 Resto del país: 1-8000-953434 Código de Ética y Normas de Conductas de los Negocios de Avianca Holdings S.A.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 13,417
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-airlines-group-iag-.jpeg
International Airlines Group (IAG)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avianca.jpeg
avianca
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
International Airlines Group (IAG)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
avianca
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

International Airlines Group (IAG) has 56.25% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for avianca in 2025.

Incident History — International Airlines Group (IAG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Airlines Group (IAG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — avianca (X = Date, Y = Severity)

avianca cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-airlines-group-iag-.jpeg
International Airlines Group (IAG)
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party supplier compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Cyberattack on payroll service provider
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: View victim's personal data, Manipulate booking information
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avianca.jpeg
avianca
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

avianca company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to International Airlines Group (IAG) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

International Airlines Group (IAG) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas avianca company has not reported any.

In the current year, International Airlines Group (IAG) company has reported more cyber incidents than avianca company.

Neither avianca company nor International Airlines Group (IAG) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

International Airlines Group (IAG) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other avianca company has not reported such incidents publicly.

International Airlines Group (IAG) company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while avianca company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither International Airlines Group (IAG) company nor avianca company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither International Airlines Group (IAG) nor avianca holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

International Airlines Group (IAG) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to avianca company.

avianca company employs more people globally than International Airlines Group (IAG) company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither International Airlines Group (IAG) nor avianca holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither International Airlines Group (IAG) nor avianca holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither International Airlines Group (IAG) nor avianca holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither International Airlines Group (IAG) nor avianca holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither International Airlines Group (IAG) nor avianca holds HIPAA certification.

Neither International Airlines Group (IAG) nor avianca holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N