Comparison Overview

SAP

VS

Atlassian

SAP

Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16, None, Walldorf, BW, DE, 69190
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

SAP is the leading enterprise application and business AI company. We stand at the intersection of business and technology, where our innovations are designed to directly address real business challenges and produce real-world impacts. Our solutions are the backbone for the world’s most complex and demanding processes. SAP’s integrated portfolio unites the elements of modern organizations — from workforce and financials to customers and supply chains — into a unified ecosystem that drives progress. SAP privacy statement for followers: www.sap.com/sps Our Community Guidelines At SAP, we're committed to fostering meaningful conversations that respect everyone in our community. To maintain a positive environment, we moderate comments that: • Target individuals personally, including our employees, customers, or partners • Contain discriminatory, harassing, or threatening language/content • Share personal information without consent • Promote misinformation or spam or 3rd-party links We believe in open dialogue and constructive feedback, but we will remove content that violates these guidelines without notice. We appreciate your understanding and contribution to a respectful community. For questions about our moderation practices, please DM or contact us at [email protected].

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 133,175
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Atlassian

Level 6/341 George St, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Atlassian powers the collaboration that helps teams accomplish what would otherwise be impossible alone. From space missions and motor racing to bugs in code and IT requests, no task is too large or too small with the right team, the right tools, and the right practices. Over 300,000 global companies and 80% of the Fortune 500 rely on Atlassian’s software, like Jira, Confluence, Loom, and Trello, to help their teams work better together and deliver quality results on time. With our 300,000+ customers and team of 10,000+ Atlassians, we are building the next generation of team collaboration and productivity software. We believe the power of teams has the potential to change the world—one that is more open, authentic, and inclusive.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 17,274
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sap.jpeg
SAP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlassian.jpeg
Atlassian
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SAP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atlassian
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

SAP has 762.07% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlassian in 2025.

Incident History — SAP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atlassian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlassian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sap.jpeg
SAP
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network, RFC-Exposed Function Module, ABAP Code Injection
Motivation: Data Theft, Data Manipulation, Privilege Escalation, Credential Theft, Operational Disruption, Potential Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network (RMI-P4 module), Path Traversal (SAP Print Service), File Upload (SAP Supplier Relationship Management)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated upload of executable binaries
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlassian.jpeg
Atlassian
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Template Injection Vulnerability
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Stolen Login Credentials
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Atlassian company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SAP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SAP company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Atlassian company.

In the current year, SAP company has reported more cyber incidents than Atlassian company.

SAP company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Atlassian company has not reported such incidents publicly.

SAP company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Atlassian company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Atlassian company nor SAP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Both SAP company and Atlassian company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither SAP nor Atlassian holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SAP company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Atlassian company.

SAP company employs more people globally than Atlassian company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither SAP nor Atlassian holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SAP nor Atlassian holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SAP nor Atlassian holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SAP nor Atlassian holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SAP nor Atlassian holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SAP nor Atlassian holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N