Comparison Overview

Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd.

VS

Apple

Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd.

鹤边路29号, GuangZhou, 510430, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd.. was formally established in 2011 and has a complete R&D, production base and sales network. The company specializes in R&D, production and sales of various polymer film materials, which are mainly used in nearly ten different fields such as mobile phone screen protectors, biomedical testing films, automotive vehicle clothing films, and construction engineering films. The company has more than 100 employees, 40% of which are R&D personnel. The factory covers an area of nearly 8,000 square meters, with complete hardware facilities and nearly 1,000 square meters of dust-free workshops. The company has successively introduced a number of advanced automatic production equipment. In line with the product concept of "only for high-quality products", the company has passed the German TUV Rheinland ISO9001, ISO14000, Sedex, BSCI, intellectual property management system, etc., and has applied for 40 trademarks and more than 70 patents. The company has more than 800 long-term and in-depth cooperation customers at home and abroad, and its products are exported to more than 60 countries in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, North America, Europe, and South America. The concept of cooperation has won unanimous praise and recognition from domestic and foreign customers.

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition: Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Apple

1 Apple Park Way, Cupertino, California, US, 95014
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

We’re a diverse collective of thinkers and doers, continually reimagining what’s possible to help us all do what we love in new ways. And the same innovation that goes into our products also applies to our practices — strengthening our commitment to leave the world better than we found it. This is where your work can make a difference in people’s lives. Including your own. Apple is an equal opportunity employer that is committed to inclusion and diversity. Visit apple.com/careers to learn more.

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition: Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing
Employees: 161,773
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
7
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ehang.jpeg
Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apple.jpeg
Apple
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Apple
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Apple has 1742.11% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Apple (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Apple cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ehang.jpeg
Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/apple.jpeg
Apple
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Access to Device, Insider Threat (Former Employee), Social Engineering (Trust Exploitation)
Motivation: Financial Gain, Reputation/Influence (Leaking Exclusive Information)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious image file, Memory manipulation
Motivation: Targeted attacks against high-value individuals, Potential mass exploitation post-patch
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Office macro, Sandboxed app
Motivation: Unauthorized access to sensitive user data, privilege escalation
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Apple company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Apple company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Apple company has reported more cyber incidents than Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. company.

Apple company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Apple company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Apple company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Apple company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. nor Apple holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. company nor Apple company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Apple company employs more people globally than Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Computers and Electronics Manufacturing.

Neither Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. nor Apple holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. nor Apple holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. nor Apple holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. nor Apple holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. nor Apple holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Guangzhou Ehang Electronics Co., Ltd. nor Apple holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N