Comparison Overview

Toyota Motor Corporation

VS

Adient

Toyota Motor Corporation

1 Toyota-Cho, None, Toyota City, Aichi Prefecture, JP, 471-8571
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Toyota Motor Corporation is a global automotive industry leader manufacturing vehicles in 27 countries or regions and marketing the company’s products in over 170 countries and regions. Founded in 1937 and headquartered in Toyota City, Japan, Toyota Motor Corporation employs nearly 350,000 people globally.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 31,153
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Adient

49200 Halyard Dr, Plymouth, Michigan, 48170, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Adient (NYSE: ADNT) is a global leader in automotive seating. With 70,000+ employees in 29 countries, Adient operates more than 200 manufacturing/assembly plants worldwide. We produce and deliver automotive seating for all major OEMs. From complete seating systems to individual foam, trim and metal components, our expertise spans every step of the automotive seat-making process. Our integrated, in-house skills allow us to take our products from research and design to engineering and manufacturing — and into millions of vehicles every year. For more information, visit www.adient.com.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 15,747
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toyota.jpeg
Toyota Motor Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adient.jpeg
Adient
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Toyota Motor Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Adient
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Toyota Motor Corporation has 233.33% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adient in 2025.

Incident History — Toyota Motor Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toyota Motor Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Adient (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adient cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toyota.jpeg
Toyota Motor Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Salesforce Customer Instances, OAuth Abuse, Third-Party App Compromises (e.g., Salesloft’s Drift/Drift), VPN Masking for Exfiltration, Weak 2FA Enforcement
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransom Extortion), Data Theft for Resale/Leverage, Public Disclosure Threats, Litigation Support as Pressure Tactic
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Vulnerabilities within interconnected systems, Advanced reconnaissance techniques, Persistent access mechanisms
Motivation: Strategic objectives, Political objectives, Reputation damage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Improperly setup cloud services
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adient.jpeg
Adient
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Adient company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Toyota Motor Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Toyota Motor Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Adient company has not reported any.

In the current year, Toyota Motor Corporation company has reported more cyber incidents than Adient company.

Toyota Motor Corporation company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Adient company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Toyota Motor Corporation company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Adient company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Toyota Motor Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Adient company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation company nor Adient company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Adient holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation company nor Adient company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Toyota Motor Corporation company employs more people globally than Adient company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Adient holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Adient holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Adient holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Adient holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Adient holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Toyota Motor Corporation nor Adient holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N