Comparison Overview

Siemens

VS

ABB

Siemens

Werner-von-Siemens-Straße 1, None, Munich, None, DE, 80333
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Siemens AG (Berlin and Munich) is a leading technology company focused on industry, infrastructure, mobility, and healthcare. The company’s purpose is to create technology to transform the everyday, for everyone. By combining the real and the digital worlds, Siemens empowers customers to accelerate their digital and sustainability transformations, making factories more efficient, cities more livable, and transportation more sustainable. Siemens also owns a majority stake in the publicly listed company Siemens Healthineers, a leading global medical technology provider pioneering breakthroughs in healthcare. For everyone. Everywhere. Sustainably. In fiscal 2024, which ended on September 30, 2024, the Siemens Group generated revenue of €75.9 billion and net income of €9.0 billion. As of September 30, 2024, the company employed around 312,000 people worldwide on the basis of continuing operations.

NAICS: 33325
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 242,813
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

ABB

Affolternstrasse 44, Zurich, ZH, CH, 8050
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849

ABB is a technology leader in electrification and automation, enabling a more sustainable and resource-efficient future. The company’s solutions connect engineering know-how and software to optimize how things are manufactured, moved, powered and operated. Building on over 140 years of excellence, ABB’s more than 110,000 employees are committed to driving innovations that accelerate industrial transformation. www.abb.com Privacy notice & house rules: https://social.abb/social-media-information Before applying for a job at ABB, please read our Fraud Warning: https://careers.abb/global/en/fraud-warning

NAICS: 33325
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 112,125
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siemens.jpeg
Siemens
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abb.jpeg
ABB
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Siemens
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ABB
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Siemens in 2025.

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABB in 2025.

Incident History — Siemens (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Siemens cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ABB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/siemens.jpeg
Siemens
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unlocked bootloader
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abb.jpeg
ABB
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Windows Active Directory
Motivation: Data theft and ransom
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Email Account (Suspicious Login Activity)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Siemens company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ABB company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ABB company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Siemens company.

In the current year, ABB company and Siemens company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ABB company nor Siemens company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

ABB company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Siemens company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ABB company nor Siemens company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Siemens company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while ABB company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Siemens nor ABB holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Siemens company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ABB company.

Siemens company employs more people globally than ABB company, reflecting its scale as a Automation Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Siemens nor ABB holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Siemens nor ABB holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Siemens nor ABB holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Siemens nor ABB holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Siemens nor ABB holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Siemens nor ABB holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions prior to 16.0.96 and 17.0.1 through 17.0.9 have a weak default password. By default, this is a 6 digit numeric value which can be brute forced. (This is the app_password parameter). Depending on local configuration, this password could be the extension, voicemail, user manager, DPMA or EPM phone admin password. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.96 and 17.0.10.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. In versions 2.8.11 and below, the MySQLWriteTool executes arbitrary SQL provided by the caller using PDO::prepare() + execute() without semantic restrictions. This is consistent with the name (“write tool”), but in an LLM/agent context it becomes a high-risk capability: prompt injection or indirect prompt manipulation can cause execution of destructive queries such as DROP TABLE, TRUNCATE, DELETE, ALTER, or privilege-related statements (subject to DB permissions). Deployments that expose an agent with MySQLWriteTool enabled to untrusted input and/or run the tool with a DB user that has broad privileges are impacted. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Description

Neuron is a PHP framework for creating and orchestrating AI Agents. Versions 2.8.11 and below use MySQLSelectTool, which is vulnerable to Read-Only Bypass. MySQLSelectTool is intended to be a read-only SQL tool (e.g., for LLM agent querying, however, validation based on the first keyword (e.g., SELECT) and a forbidden-keyword list does not block file-writing constructs such as INTO OUTFILE / INTO DUMPFILE. As a result, an attacker who can influence the tool input (e.g., via prompt injection through a public agent endpoint) may write arbitrary files to the DB server if the MySQL/MariaDB account has the FILE privilege and server configuration permits writes to a useful location (e.g., a web-accessible directory). This issue is fixed in version 2.8.12.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

Okta Java Management SDK facilitates interactions with the Okta management API. In versions 11.0.0 through 20.0.0, race conditions may arise from concurrent requests using the ApiClient class. This could cause a status code or response header from one request’s response to influence another request’s response. This issue is fixed in version 20.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

The Auth0 Next.js SDK is a library for implementing user authentication in Next.js applications. When using versions 4.11.0 through 4.11.2 and 4.12.0, simultaneous requests on the same client may result in improper lookups in the TokenRequestCache for the request results. This issue is fixed in versions 4.11.2 and 4.12.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N